Field soil dissipation study applications

The four main phases involved in a field soil dissipation study are (I) planning and design phase, (II) field-conduct phase, (III) sample processing/analysis phase, and (IV) data handling/reporting phase. Each phase is vitally linked to the next and each is critical to study success. Results from an otherwise perfectly executed study may be made useless by uneven test substance application or improper sampling, sample handling, and/or analytical techniques. Each of these phases is discussed below. 

The time of year in which a pesticide is applied significantly affects its dissipation rate due to temperature, moisture, and solar-irradiance effects on abiotic and biotic dissipation processes. For example, dissipation rates for agrochemical applications made in the springtime are normally greater than those observed for fall (autumn) applications. Thus, the timing of agrochemical applications made in field soil dissipation studies should closely match those occurring under acmal-use conditions. 

Depending on the apphcation, one or more source of control matrix may be available for selectivity screening. For instance, when testing for herbicides in a soil dissipation study the control matrix may come from the actual field where the study is to take place prior to application of the herbicide or from an adjacent control plot For bioanalytical analysis several lots of control matrix may be screened independently and as a pool (Section 10.4.1c), and additional selectivity data may be obtained from actual subjects prior to dosing (pre-dose samples). When a representative control matrix is not available or if additional confidence is required for analyte identification additional measures such as the inclusion of multiple... 

As more sensitive analytical methods for pesticides are developed, greater care must be taken to avoid sample contamination and misidentification of residues. For example, in pesticide leaching or field dissipation studies, small amounts of surface soil coming in contact with soil core or soil pore water samples taken from further below the ground surface can sometimes lead to wildly inaccurate analytical results. This is probably the cause of isolated, high-level detections of pesticides in the lower part of the vadose zone or in groundwater in samples taken soon after application when other data (weather, soil permeability determinations and other pesticide or tracer analytical results) imply that such results are highly improbable. 

A.S. Felsot, R.G. Evans, and J.R. Ruppert, Field studies of imidacloprid distribution following application to soil through a drip irrigation system , in Terrestrial Field Dissipation Studies Design, Interpretation and Purpose, ed. E.L. Arthur, V.E. Clay, and A. Barefoot, ACS Symposium Series No. 842, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC (2003). 

The first step in a wildlife exposure assessment is to document the occurrence and persistence of a pesticide in the study area throughout the study duration. Several articles in this book describe the experimental designs and best practices to conduct field crop and environmental dissipation (air, soil and water) studies. This article presents methods to quantify spatial and temporal distributions of pesticide presence in ecosystems following normal application and resultant exposure of nontarget wildlife. 

Analyses of residues in the soils after incubation showed that the persistence of diazinon was considerably shorter in the previously treated soil than in the untreated soil. The half-life value for diazinon in previously treated soil was 1.7 days while in the untreated soil it was 9.9 days. Most of the insecticide added to the previously treated soil was lost within 10 days. Paddy water from the same fields were tested also for diazinon-degrading activity (17). Again water from a rice field treated previously with diazinon inactivated the insecticide more rapidly than did the water from an untreated field. In the water from the previously treated field the insecticide dissipated completely within 3-5 days of incubation after an initial lag of 1-2 days (17, 18). Table II summarizes the results of the study on the stability of diazinon in soil and paddy water. The data indicated clearly that a factor capable of degrading diazinon developed in rice fields of the Institute farm after insecticide applications. The diazinon-degrading factor, found in the diazinon-treated rice fields in the Institute farm, was noticed also in three other locations in the Philippines (19). 

---