Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fermi function wave vector

Figure 7. The occupation number densities as functions of wave vector for Na. The thick curves labeled (100), (110) and (111) represent the three principal directions within the first Brillouin zone, obtained by the FLAPW-GWA. The thin solid curve is obtained from an interacting electron-gas model [27]. The dash-dotted line represents the Fermi momentum. [Pg.96]

Fig. 6.3 The wave-vector dependence of the Lindhard response function. X(<7/2Af), which has been normalized by the constant Thomas-Fermi response function, xtf The dashed curve shows an approximation (eqn (6.89)) to the Lindhard response function that does not include the weak logarithmic singularity in the slope at q 2kF = 1 (From Pettifor and Ward (1984).)... Fig. 6.3 The wave-vector dependence of the Lindhard response function. X(<7/2Af), which has been normalized by the constant Thomas-Fermi response function, xtf The dashed curve shows an approximation (eqn (6.89)) to the Lindhard response function that does not include the weak logarithmic singularity in the slope at q 2kF = 1 (From Pettifor and Ward (1984).)...
The physical origin of these asymptotic Friedel oscillations of wave vector, 2/cf, can be traced back to eqn (6.35) for the response function, x0(q). We see from the numerator that there are only contributions to the sum for the states, k, that are occupied and the states + q that are unoccupied, or vice versa. This is to be expected considering Pauli s exclusion principle in that an electron in state, k, can only scatter into state, + q, if it is empty. Moreover, we see from the denominator in eqn (6.35) that the individual contributions will be largest for the case of scattering between states that are very close to the Fermi surface, since then k2 — (k + q)2 0. We deduce from Fig. 6.5 that the maximum number of such scattering events will occur... [Pg.144]

The required 2D nearly free electron gas is realized in Shockley type surface states of close-packed surfaces of noble metals. These states are located in narrow band gaps in the center of the first Brillouin zone of the (lll)-projected bulk band structure. The fact that their occupied bands are entirely in bulk band gaps separates the electrons in the 2D surface state from those in the underlying bulk. Only at structural defects, such as steps or adsorbates, is there an overlap of the wave functions, opening a finite transmission between the 2D and the 3D system. The fact that the surface state band is narrow implies extremely small Fermi wave vectors and consequently the Friedel oscillations of the surface state have a significantly larger wave length than those of bulk states. [Pg.250]

When the conductor is at T < T, any further evolution of the solid will be dominated by the two-dimensional Fermi surface, in which the phenomenon of nesting is all important. Figure 7b illustrates this peculiar property of the Fermi surface, where part of the Fermi surface, say at k < 0, can superimpose on the other part when translated by wave vector Q0. The response functions at this wave vector is dominant. In two dimensions, the mixing between electron-electron and electron-hole channels (see Section IV.B.3.b) does not occur. The RPA structure emerges. At Q = Q0, one has, putting W" = V" - g",... [Pg.58]

In equation (23) kp is the Fermi wave vector and the transition rate depends on the distance Za between ion and surface through the wave function of the state la) in equation (22). [Pg.187]

In the beta-decay allowed approximation, we neglect the variation of the lepton wave-functions over the nuclear volume and the nuclear momentum (this is equivalent to neglecting all total lepton orbital angular momenta L > 0). The total angular momentum carried off by the leptons is their total spin i.e. 5 = 1 or 0, since each lepton has When the lepton spins in the final state are antiparallel, se+s = stot = 0 the process is the Fermi transition with Vector coupling constant g = Cv (e.g. a pure Fermi decay 140(J r = 0+) —>14 N(JJ = 0+)). When the final state lepton spins are parallel, se + sv = stot = 1> the process is... [Pg.224]

From a conceptual point of view, it appears that polymer quantum chemistry is an ideal field for cooperation between condensed matter physicists and molecular quantum chemists. There exists a common interpretation in the discussions concerning orbital energies, orbital symmetry, and gross charges by chemists and solid-state physicists. These physicists use terms less familiar to the chemist, such as first Brillouin zone, dependence of wave function with respect to wave vector k (the one-electron wave function is called an orbital by the chemist), Fermi surfaces, Fermi contours, and density of states (DOS). [Pg.1015]

The minute particles, which a solid consists of, have the extraordinary quantum features. However, there is a gap between quantum theory on the one hand and engineering on the other hand. Even the principal notions and terms are different. The quantum physics operates with such notions as electron, nucleus, atom, energy, the electronic band structure, wave vector, wave function, Fermi surface, phonon, and so on. The objects in the engineering material science are crystal lattice, microstructure, grain size, alloy, strength, strain, wear properties, robustness, creep, fatigue, and so on. [Pg.319]

There are several generalizations of this functional form most differ on whether the Fermi wave vector in Equation 1.103 is considered to be constant, to vary with r (as shown in Equation 1.103), or to be replaced by a synunetrized form based on the generalized p-mean ... [Pg.25]

To the best of our knowledge, this equation was the first expression for G q, u), which was evaluated with respect to both the wave vector and the frequency dependence [Ref. 9]. Some results are shown in Fig. 1, where the real part of G(q, u) is plotted as a function of frequency (expressed in units proportional to the Fermi-frequency) for different values of the wave vector (in units of twice the Fermi wave vector). [Pg.41]

The Fermi wave vector kp = Ep/h is a meaningful quantity (k is a good quantum number ) as long as the scattering is weak, that is, Ak 1/A << l/ kp/2 tr. In this limit, the electronic wave function retains phase coherence over many interatomic distances as illustrated in Fig. 2.9(a). In the integral of Eq. 2.7, the ionic arrangement is described by S Q), the liquid structure factor which we discuss in detail in later chapters. The scattering characteristics of the ions are represented by the so-called form factor v(Q)... [Pg.28]

Fig. 26, A plot of the F(k) function against the wave vector Ic for different values of 2k, (Fermi vector) in TbRujSi (Slasiti et al. 1984). Fig. 26, A plot of the F(k) function against the wave vector Ic for different values of 2k, (Fermi vector) in TbRujSi (Slasiti et al. 1984).
An alternative to the cluster approach are the band methods which directly take into account the translational symmetry of crystals, a feature which provides, in the case of moderately complicated crystal structures, a higher accuracy in the calculation of the electronic structure and physico-chemical characteristics of crystals. The band methods make it possible to determine a larger (compared to the cluster approach) set of the crystal electronic structure characteristics, e.g., the topology of the Fermi surface, or the energy levels in crystals as a function of wave vectors (dispersion curves). [Pg.2]

Krainik, Lisenko, Zhurakovsky and Ivashchenko (1989) also calculated the Fermi surface of MoC, for x = 1.0,0.7,0.5,0.75. As the Fermi surface analogue for nonstoichiometric compounds the authors took the spectral Bloch function characterising the probability of electron location at the state with the wave vector k and energy Epi... [Pg.104]

In order to evaluate this integral we will use the following trick the average occupation number drops off very sharply from unity to zero near ep a function of the energy, or equivalently near kp as a function of the magnitude of the wave-vector k = k, where kp is the Fermi momentum that appeared in Eqs. (D.9), (D. 10) and (D. 11). We can therefore expand in a Taylor series around kp to obtain... [Pg.619]


See other pages where Fermi function wave vector is mentioned: [Pg.227]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.1308]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.1082]    [Pg.1307]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.733]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.426]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.136 ]




SEARCH



Fermi function

Fermi vector

Fermi wave vector

Vector function

Wave vector

© 2024 chempedia.info