Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Fault tolerant network

CAN is the serial communication network used in most intelligent SAS products. Future systems such as SbW will need fault-tolerant networks (FTU), which provide the necessary safety level for those systems, that is, being predictable and deterministic. There are two major protocols in development, TTP (time triggered protocol [32]) and Flexray, supported by two different consortia of car manufacturers and system suppliers. VW/Audi, PSA, Renault, Delphi, Visteon, United Technologies, Airbus, Honeywell, AMS C C Electronics, and NEC are in the TTP consortium. DC, BMW, CM, Bosch, Philips, digital dna, Motorola, and partners are the Flexray group [30, 31]. [Pg.444]

The hardware and software used to implement LIMS systems must be vahdated. Computers and networks need to be examined for potential impact of component failure on LIMS data. Security concerns regarding control of access to LIMS information must be addressed. Software, operating systems, and database management systems used in the implementation of LIMS systems must be vahdated to protect against data cormption and loss. Mechanisms for fault-tolerant operation and LIMS data backup and restoration should be documented and tested. One approach to vahdation of LIMS hardware and software is to choose vendors whose products are precertified however, the ultimate responsibihty for vahdation remains with the user. Vahdating the LIMS system s operation involves a substantial amount of work, and an adequate vahdation infrastmcture is a prerequisite for the constmction of a dependable and flexible LIMS system. [Pg.518]

Recently, a new approach called artificial neural networks (ANNs) is assisting engineers and scientists in their assessment of fuzzy information, Polymer scientists often face a situation where the rules governing the particular system are unknown or difficult to use. It also frequently becomes an arduous task to develop functional forms/empirical equations to describe a phenomena. Most of these complexities can be overcome with an ANN approach because of its ability to build an internal model based solely on the exposure in a training environment. Fault tolerance of ANNs has been found to be very advantageous in physical property predictions of polymers. This chapter presents a few such cases where the authors have successfully implemented an ANN-based approach for purpose of empirical modeling. These are not exhaustive by any means. [Pg.1]

Powell et al. 2001] D. Powell, A. Adelsbach, C. Cachin, S. Creese, M. Dacier, Y. Deswarte, T. McCutcheon, N. Neves, B. Pfitzmann, B. Randell, R. Stroud, P. Verfssimo and M. Waidner. MAFTIA (Malicious-and Accidental-Fault Tolerance for Internet Apphcations), in Supplement of the 2001 Int. Conf. on Dependable Systems and Networks, pp. D32-D35, Goteborg, Sweden, IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001. [Pg.160]

El-Farra, N.H., Gani, A., and Christofides, P. D. (2005). Fault-tolerant control of process systems using communication networks. AIChE J., 51, 1665-1682. [Pg.248]

You must choose the appropriate topology in which to arrange your network. Each type differs by its cost, ease of installation, fault tolerance (how the topology handles problems like cable breaks), and ease of reconfiguration (like adding a new workstation to the existing network). [Pg.313]

Which of the following physical network topologies offers the most fault tolerance in terms of cable interruption, while balancing requirements for amount of cable required ... [Pg.893]

D. With a physical star topology, each network device connects to a central hub. This prevents the entire network from failing in the event of a single cable segment failure. The mesh topology is technically more fault tolerant, but is not practical due to the amount of cable that would be required. See Chapter 8 for more information. [Pg.896]

An implementation showed that employment of several intrusion detection systems in parallel not only increases the fault tolerance but is also a scalability parameter, allowing for adoption to changing network load for further results see [77]. [Pg.422]

Studies performed by Yuan et al. on conductive polyaniline (PANI) nanofibers, P3DOT, and CNT thin films show that aU three are capable of forming highly compliant electrodes with fault tolerant behavior [225]. Nanowires and tubes are of particular interest since they are capable of maintaining a percolation network at large strains, thus reducing the required electrode thickness while still allowing for maximum strain performance. [Pg.33]

To overcome the one-sidedness of safety evaluation, based on the characteristics of parallel structure and parallel processing, safety status of oil depot can be evaluated comprehensively by choosing suitable evaluation index Using the fault tolerant characteristics of neural network, non numerical index can be calculated by choosing suitable function and data structure to realize fuzzy safety evaluation of oil depot. [Pg.1208]

C. Weaver, T. Austin, A Fault Tolerant Approach to Microprocessor Design, IEEE Inti. Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN-2001), July 2001. [Pg.1905]

As in nature, networks are relatively fault tolerant concerning, for example, changes in synaptic connections. All these effects can be measured by the change of membrane potential during an action potential (cf. Sect. 3.2). This potential has a direct influence on the gate of a field-effect transistor, or, in another device, it influences the capacity between a microelectrode and the axon, which can be measured with a.c.-coupled amplifiers with high input impedances. AU measurement conditions have to be chosen so that no electrochemical reaction takes place at the electrode surface in order to avoid the formation of poisoning chemicals. [Pg.5360]

Data replication in DHTs increases the availabihty of data throughout the network. DHT entries are stored at k different peers, usually fc = 3. Large values of k result in increased availabihty and fault tolerance of the sj tem. The downside is reduced system performance due to increasing network traffic. If a peer p that provides a datum d leaves the network, d is stiff available at fc — 1 other peers. Subsequent to peer p s departure, P2P self-organization mechanisms adapt the P2P network s routing tables and choose another peer to store the replicas formerly stored on p. [Pg.169]

Fault tolerant ethemet (FTE) is quite a good solution. This has been developed by Honeywell. The FTE connects a group of nodes typically associated with communication paths between them, so the network can tolerate all single faults and many multiple faults. FTE can rapidly detect faults and, in case of communication failure. [Pg.831]

Fault tolerant Ethernet network. (A) Fault tolerant Ethernet network, (B) FTE network communication FTE to FTE node commimication four possible commimication paths, (C) FTE network commimication common between 2 Ethernet nodes single possible communication path, (D) FTE network commimication common between FTE Ethernet nodes two possible commimication path. FTE, fault tolerant Ethernet UTP/STP, unshielded twisted pair/sparming tree protocol. [Pg.832]

Interface). The former tends to be used where high levels of functionality and data rates are needed whereas the latter, which is based on the controller area network (CAN) protocol, is used in applications where there are lower functionality and simple input/output requirements. The manufacturers of these fieldbus systems have worked on developing them for use in safety applications, mainly to incorporate appropriate levels of fault tolerance or safety integrity. This has led to the availability of the Profisafe and AS-Isafe fieldbuses. In addition, PILZ has developed the SafetyBUS fieldbus for safety applications, which is again based on the CAN protocol, and the Open Devicenet Vendors Association has developed a safety version of the DeviceNet fieldbus called DeviceNet Safety. [Pg.245]

Reddy, V., Rotenberg, E. Inherent time redundancy (itr) Using program repetition for low-overhead fault tolerance. In DSN 2007 Proceedings of the 37th Annual lEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)... [Pg.295]

Fault tolerance. If the architecture of the network is damaged, the network will retain some functionality. This is more important if the neural network is implemented in custom hardware rather than on a desktop computer. [Pg.49]


See other pages where Fault tolerant network is mentioned: [Pg.830]    [Pg.833]    [Pg.830]    [Pg.833]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.823]    [Pg.823]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.807]    [Pg.830]    [Pg.708]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.25]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.444 ]




SEARCH



Fault tolerance

Fault tolerant

© 2024 chempedia.info