Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Faraday efficiency

According to Faraday s law, one Faraday (26.80 Ah) should deposit one gram equivalent (8.994 g) of aluminum. In practice only 85—95% of this amount is obtained. Loss of Faraday efficiency is caused mainly by reduced species ( Al, Na, or A1F) dissolving or dispersing in the electrolyte (bath) at the cathode and being transported toward the anode where these species are reoxidized by carbon dioxide forming carbon monoxide and metal oxide, which then dissolves in the electrolyte. Certain bath additives, particularly aluminum fluoride, lower the content of reduced species in the electrolyte and thereby improve current efficiency. [Pg.97]

Performance parameters of the electrolysis include the applied voltage, E (V), the applied current, I (A), and the hydrogen production rate, Q (Nt/h) at the reference condition of 0.1 MPa (1 bar) and 273 K (0°C). The Faraday efficiency, cr, expressed in Equation 4.6, is the ratio of AG to the applied power, I E, that is, the ratio of the theoretical electric power needed for the electrolysis to the actually applied power of the cell. Thus, the Faraday efficiency is one useful measurement to judge electrolysis performance. [Pg.130]

Figure 4.8 shows the relation between current and H2 production densities obtained at 850°C of electrolysis temperature. The maximum H2 production density was 38 Ncm3/cm2h, which was higher than that of the electrolysis tube obtained at 950°C. The maximum H2 production rate was 2.4 Nt/h at the applied power of 10 W applied voltage and current were 2.68 and 3.72 A. Then the open-circuit voltage was 0.847 V. Hence, the Faraday efficiency and the energy efficiencies were 0.5 and around 0.73, respectively, which were almost the same values as those of the electrolysis tube obtained at 950°C. [Pg.136]

Note Solute recovery efficiency, J Faraday efficiency, Q specific energy consumption, s solute flux, JB and average water flux, /w. [Pg.332]

Intrinsic tests were performed on the electrolyser and fuel cell of the test bench system for their characterisation (electrical and thermal behaviour, Faraday efficiency, gas purity). Additionally simulations were performed using the Matlab/Simulink software in order to develop a numerical model for such a kind of reversible fuel cell . The system storage efficiency was estimated at 40-42%. [Pg.92]

Anode material Anode potential (V) Cell potential (V) Color removal (%) COD removal (%) Faraday efficiency (%)... [Pg.38]

The current efficiency or so called Faraday efficiency eparaday is the ratio of gas... [Pg.157]

The Faraday efficiency typically reaches values of over 90 % [12]. To calculate the overall efficiency etotai of an electrolyser, system losses due to the power supply of peripheral devices have to be included (see Eq. (5.18)). [Pg.157]

In this case, compared with the direct electrochemical oxidation of the fuel [Eq. (2.2)], the Faraday efficiency is only 75% since the production of syngas (H, + CO) is not an electrochemical process, and electrons (six instead of eight) are generated only by the electrochemical oxidation of the syngas. In addition to this intrinsically reduced efficiency, current SC-SOFC systems show very low fuel utilization (1-8%) and thus efficiencies [4,18, 19]. While gas intermixing, small-scale electrodes, and high flow rates contribute to the low efficiency, non-ideally selective electrode materials and parasitic reactions are the primary reason. The further development of SC-SOFCs therefore requires active and selective materials for optimized performance. [Pg.46]

The data presented in Table 3.2 show how 100% Faraday efficiency, i.e., complete hydrogen utilization, could be reached with little sacrifice of polarization and limiting current density by optimizing the fine-pore layer coating. Finer pores on the electrolyte are required to prevent gas leakage. The Faraday efficiency is known as the gas consumption efficiency to scientists and engineers working in the electrochemical field. [Pg.91]

The terminal voltage and power output are from a single Hj-Oj cell. The cells must be connected in a series to obtain higher power output. To collect data for a meaningful endurance test, the test must involve a large number of Hj-Oj fuel cells. During the endurance test, the electrode potential can be continuously monitored and the data are available to plot Faraday efficiency. [Pg.314]

Sulfonated poly(phthalazinone ether sulfone ketone) (sPPESK) (Eig. 1.10) was prepared by sulfonation of PPESK with faming H2SO4. The proton conductivity of sPPESK (DS of 81%) was 0.013 at 80 °C (not much lower than that of Nafion 15). On the other hand, its permeability to methanol at 15 °C was apparently nearly 40 times less than that of Nafion 115. These results seem to indicate that the Faraday efficiency of DMFCs may be good, if sPPESK membranes are used as PEMs [168]. [Pg.32]


See other pages where Faraday efficiency is mentioned: [Pg.133]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.56]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.156 ]




SEARCH



Faraday

© 2024 chempedia.info