Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Factorial designs matrix design

Table 2 Experimental design factorial 2 design matrix for the two level full... Table 2 Experimental design factorial 2 design matrix for the two level full...
Step 1. Perform a series of initial experiments (based on a factorial design) to obtain initial estimates for the parameters and their covariance matrix. [Pg.190]

Because variables in models are often highly correlated, when experimental data are collected, the xrx matrix in Equation 2.9 can be badly conditioned (see Appendix A), and thus the estimates of the values of the coefficients in a model can have considerable associated uncertainty. The method of factorial experimental design forces the data to be orthogonal and avoids this problem. This method allows you to determine the relative importance of each input variable and thus to develop a parsimonious model, one that includes only the most important variables and effects. Factorial experiments also represent efficient experimentation. You systematically plan and conduct experiments in which all of the variables are changed simultaneously rather than one at a time, thus reducing the number of experiments needed. [Pg.62]

Abstract A preconcentration method using Amberlite XAD-16 column for the enrichment of aluminum was proposed. The optimization process was carried out using fractional factorial design. The factors involved were pH, resin amount, reagent/metal mole ratio, elution volume and samphng flow rate. The absorbance was used as analytical response. Using the optimised experimental conditions, the proposed procedure allowed determination of aluminum with a detection limit (3o/s) of 6.1 ig L and a quantification limit (lOa/s) of 20.2 pg L, and a precision which was calculated as relative standard deviation (RSD) of 2.4% for aluminum concentration of 30 pg L . The preconcentration factor of 100 was obtained. These results demonstrated that this procedure could be applied for separation and preconcentration of aluminum in the presence of several matrix. [Pg.313]

Inspection of the coded experimental design matrix shows that the first four experiments belong to the two-level two-factor factorial part of the design, the next four experiments are the extreme points of the star design, and the last four experiments are replicates of the center point. The corresponding matrix for the six-parameter model of Equation 12.54 is... [Pg.250]

The lower left panel in Figure 13.2 shows the central composite design in the two factors X, and X2. The factor domain extends from -5 to +5 in each factor dimension. The coordinate axes in this panel are rotated 45° to correspond to the orientation of the axes in the panel above. Each black dot represents a distinctly different factor combination, or design point. The pattern of dots shows a central composite design centered at (Xj = 0, Xj = 0). The factorial points are located 2 units from the center. The star points are located 4 units from the center. The three concentric circles indicate that the center point has been replicated a total of four times. The experimental design matrix is... [Pg.282]

In Figure 13.9, instead of carrying out four replicate experiments at the center point (as in Figure 13.2), the four replicates are carried out such that one experiment is moved to each of the existing four factorial points. The experimental design matrix is... [Pg.294]

Assume a constrained factor space of -5 < jc, +5, -5 < jcj +5. Assume the full two-factor model with interaction, y, = Po + PiJCi, + 2 21 + Pn ii i + "ii- Assume a 2 factorial design. How should the four design points be placed to maximize the determinant of the (X X) matrix Demonstrate with a few calculations. [Pg.315]

A section has been added to Chapter 1 on the distinction between analytic vs. enumerative studies. A section on mixture designs has been added to Chapter 9. A new chapter on the application of linear models and matrix least squares to observational data has been added (Chapter 10). Chapter 13 attempts to give a geometric feel to concepts such as uncertainty, information, orthogonality, rotatability, extrapolation, and rigidity of the design. Finally, Chapter 14 expands on some aspects of factorial-based designs. [Pg.454]

The experiments depicted in Figs. 1 and 4 did not determine true optima. In the study of carbon and nitrogen interactions, the optima appeared to lie in the range of 2.4 to 4.0 g/1 for carbon and 0.084 to 0.14 gA nitrogen. One point fell in this range, and it was the maximum for this series of experiments but it is not necessarily an optimum. Likewise, in the partial factorial design depicted in Fig. 4, all of the maxima occurred at star points rather than within the matrix, so it is apparent that the optimum or optima lie somewhere outside the limits of the experimental design. Despite these limitations, several useful inferences can be drawn from these data. [Pg.205]

DOE is a methodical statistics approach to studying the qualitative effects of process variables. Variables of interest are given a number of values based on the expected relationships [8]. For example, if the relationship is expected to be linear over a range, two variations can be used to approximate the effect of the variable. For effects that are expected to be quadratic, three variations may be needed. These variations are then matrixed to create a set of trials that differentiate and quantify the effect of each variable. If the number of variables is small, then the experiments can be designed as a full factorial. An example of a full two factorial design of an experiment for three variables is shown in Table 15.1. [Pg.448]

A full three factorial matrix on the 11 variables in the cure cycle shown in Figure 15.1 would mean 177,147 individual trials. A full two factorial design would still mean 2048 trials. Such a design, however, assumes that all interactions, even between all 11 variables, will be important. DOE provides an ordered means of combining variables to reduce the total number of trials. The assumption made is that high-order interactions (i.e., interactions of three or more variables) are rare and/or insignificant. There are several methods for combining variables by DOE. A detailed discussion of these methods is the subject of another book [9]. [Pg.449]

Statistical optimization of a controlled release formulation obtained by a double-compression process Application of a Hadamard matrix and a factorial design... [Pg.43]

According to the Hadamard matrix, a 22 factorial design was built. The complete linear models were fitted by regression for each response, reflecting the compression behaviour and dissolution kinetics. [Pg.43]

From a minimum number of experiments, the Hadamard matrix gives the possibility of estimating the mean effects of four parameters. Among them, the particle size range had the most important effect in the release of diclofenac sodium. By interpreting data, a factorial design including only two parameters was applied from which an optimum formulation was found. [Pg.51]

Applying a matrixing design on time points only, all factor combinations (full factorial design) should be tested at the initial and hnal points in time, while a... [Pg.594]

A full factorial 2 design allows the study of three main factors and their interactions to be carried out in eight experiments or runs. The first requirement is to set out the experimental design matrix. This is shown in Table 2. A is the molar concentration of the acetic acid, M is the methanol concentration, %v/v, and C is the citric acid concentration, g All combinations are covered in eight experimental runs. Note that this is not the order in which they are performed. These should be carried out in a random sequence. There will be a value of the CRF for each run. [Pg.29]

Table 4 Full design matrix for a two level full factorial 2 design... Table 4 Full design matrix for a two level full factorial 2 design...
The "design matrix" of a factorial design is a list detailing the total number of treatments, combinations or experiments. Columns represent each of the factors being studied, denoted by capital letters, and each row corresponds to an experiment. Hence a 2 factorial design would have 4 runs with the following design matrix ... [Pg.55]

Similarly, a 2 factorial design has 8 runs and its design matrix is ... [Pg.55]

A "matrix design" is a suitable way of obtaining all the treatment combinations implicated in a 2 factorial design, but it is not a handy system to notate... [Pg.55]

Two algorithms are available to perform all the calculations in a very simple way, namely the Box, Hunter and Hunter (BH ) algorithm and Yates s algorithm. Both are considered below for a typical and simple example of a 2 factorial design. Assume we are studying the influence of pH (A), temperature (B) and time (C) over the yield (response in %) of the extraction of a metal from a complex analytical matrix, just before conducting the extracts to an ICP device. The levels of each factor, fixed by the analyst, are pH (A), 3 (—), 5(4-) temperature (B), 40 (-), 60 C ( + ) and time (C), 1 (-), 2h. (- -). The matrix design and the experimental data are as follows ... [Pg.56]

From preliminary assays, the experimental error was estimated as 2.50%, expressed as percentage recovery. Note that the complete factorial design is a 2 , requiring 128 runs, whereas the Plackett-Burman design needs only 8 runs to estimate the effects. The responses to the 8 runs corresponding to the design matrix in Table 2.6 were as follows ... [Pg.66]

M. Villanueva, M. Pomares, M. Catases and J. Diaz, Application of factorial designs for the description and correction of combined matrix effects in ICP-AES, Quim. Anal., 19(1), 2000, 39-42. [Pg.143]

M. Zougagh, P. C. Rudner, A. Garcia-de-Torres and J. M. Cano-Pavon, Application of Doehlert matrix and factorial designs in the optimisation of experimental variables associated with the on-line preconcentration and determination of zinc by flow injection inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 15(12), 2000, 1589-1594. [Pg.150]

N. Jalbani, T. G. Kazi, M. K. Jamali, M. B. Arain, H. I. Afridi, S. T. Sheerazi and R. Ansari, Application of fractional factorial design and Doehlert matrix in the optimisation of experimental variables associated with the ultrasonic-assisted acid digestion of chocolate samples for aluminium determination by atomic absorption spectrometry, J. AO AC Int., 90(6), 2007, 1682-1688. [Pg.150]


See other pages where Factorial designs matrix design is mentioned: [Pg.35]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.149]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.55 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.127 ]




SEARCH



Design matrix

Factorial

Factorial design

Factorial design dispersion matrix

Factorial design model matrix

Factories

© 2024 chempedia.info