Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Least squares matrix

Note that the response is not a function of any factors. For this model, an estimate of Po (the estimate is given the symbol is the mean of the two responses, y and [Pg.76]

Of the total two degrees of freedom, one degree of freedom has been used to estimate the parameter Pq, leaving one degree of freedom for the estimation of the variance of the residuals, aj. [Pg.76]

Suppose these solutions had been attempted using simultaneous linear equations. One reasonable set of linear equations might appear to be [Pg.76]

There is a problem with this approach, however - a problem with the residuals. The residuals are neither parameters of the model nor parameters associated with the uncertainty. They are quantities related to a parameter that expresses the variance of the residuals, The problem, then, is that the simultaneous equations approach in Equation 5.25 would attempt to uniquely calculate three items (P, r, and r,2) using only two experiments, clearly an impossible task. What is needed is an additional constraint to reduce the number of items that need to be estimated. A unique solution will then exist. [Pg.77]

We will use the constraint that the sum of squares of the residuals be minimal. The following is a brief development of the matrix approach to the least squares fitting of linear models to data. The approach is entirely general for all linear models. [Pg.77]


X-ray structural analysis. Suitable crystals of compound 14 were obtained from toluene/ether solutions. X-ray data were collected on a STOE-IPDS diffractometer using graphite monochromated Mo-Ka radiation. The structure was solved by direct methods (SHELXS-86)16 and refined by full-matrix-least-squares techniques against F2 (SHELXL-93).17 Crystal dimensions 0.3 0.2 0.1 mm, yellow-orange prisms, 3612 reflections measured, 3612 were independent of symmetry and 1624 were observed (I > 2ct(7)), R1 = 0.048, wR2 (all data) = 0.151, 295 parameters. [Pg.467]

The chitobiose unit has been treated as a rigid body, and by using the full-matrix, least-squares, rigid-body, refinement procedure, the structure was refined to an R factor of 40.7%. Visually estimated intensities were used. The structure was found to be free from short contacts, and to be stabilized by an intrachain OH-3—0-5 hydrogen-bond and one interchain N-H—O hydrogen-bond. [Pg.399]

Let us use the matrix least squares method to obtain an algebraic expression for the estimate of Pq in the model y, = Po + r, (see Figure 5.2) with two experiments at two different levels of the factor x,. The initial X, B, R, and F arrays are given in Equation 5.27. Other matrices are... [Pg.79]

It is not possible to fit this model using matrix least squares techniques The matrix of parameter coefficients, X, does not exist - it is a 0x0 matrix and has no elements because there are no parameters in the model. However, the matrix of residuals, R, is defined. It should not be surprising that for this model, R = Y that is, the matrix of residuals is identical to the matrix of responses. [Pg.92]

Use matrix least squares (Section 5.2) to estimate and b, in Problem 5.2. [Pg.93]

A single matrix least squares calculation can be employed when the same linear model is used to fit each of several system responses. The D, X, X X), and matrices remain the same, but the Y, X Y), 6, and R matrices have additional columns, one column for each response. Fit the model = Po + Pi u + following multiresponse data,y = 1, 2, 3 ... [Pg.149]

Using matrix least squares techniques (see Section 5.2), the chosen linear model may be fit to the data to obtain a set of parameter estimates, B, from which predicted values of response, y, may be obtained. It is convenient to define a matrix of estimated responses, F. [Pg.156]

The corresponding matrix least squares treatment for the full second-order polynomial model proceeds as follows. [Pg.263]

We have chosen to use the x,-type notation because it is consistent with the mathematical notation used in both linear models and matrix least squares [Neter, Wasserman, and Kutner (1990)]. However, both systems are in use today. For that reason, in this chapter we will also use the classical notation, and will use it interchangeably with the x,-type notation. [Pg.317]

What is the equivalent four-parameter linear model expressing y, as a function of jci and xfl Use matrix least squares (regression analysis) to fit this linear model to the data. How are the classical factor effects and the regression factor effects related. Draw the sums of squares and degrees of freedom tree. How many degrees of freedom are there for SS, 55, and SS 7... [Pg.357]

Assume the gloss retention responses associated with Equation 14.49 are (in order) 98, 84, 70, 106, 92, 90, 114, 112, and 98. Using matrix least squares and the model of Equation 14.50, what is the estimated effect of the additive (h,) Using matrix... [Pg.359]

Matrix least squares fitting of the model of Equation 15.6 gives an X X) matrix that can be inverted. The fitted model is... [Pg.367]

Treating the data by conventional matrix least squares techniques gives... [Pg.383]

The book has been written around a framework of linear models and matrix least squares. Because we authors are so often involved in the measurement aspects of investigations, we have a special fondness for the estimation of purely experimental uncertainty. The text reflects this prejudice. We also prefer the term purely experimental uncertainty rather than the traditional pure error , for reasons we as analytical chemists believe should be obvious. [Pg.451]

A section has been added to Chapter 1 on the distinction between analytic vs. enumerative studies. A section on mixture designs has been added to Chapter 9. A new chapter on the application of linear models and matrix least squares to observational data has been added (Chapter 10). Chapter 13 attempts to give a geometric feel to concepts such as uncertainty, information, orthogonality, rotatability, extrapolation, and rigidity of the design. Finally, Chapter 14 expands on some aspects of factorial-based designs. [Pg.454]

SHELXL (Sheldrick and Schneider, 1997) is often viewed as a refinement program for high-resolution data only. Although it undoubtedly offers features needed for that resolution regime (optimization of anisotropic temperature factors, occupancy refinement, full matrix least squares to obtain standard deviations from the inverse Hessian matrix, flexible definitions for NCS, easiness to describe partially... [Pg.164]


See other pages where Least squares matrix is mentioned: [Pg.244]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.108]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.76 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.69 , Pg.83 , Pg.84 , Pg.86 , Pg.133 ]




SEARCH



Calibration matrix classical least-squares

Classical Least Squares (K-Matrix)

Covariance matrices general least squares

Data matrices alternating least squares

Full-matrix least-squares refinement

Least matrix

Matrices square matrix

Partial least squares coefficient matrix

Partial least squares residuals matrices

Regression matrix least squares

Structure refinement, full-matrix least-squares

© 2024 chempedia.info