Fabrication techniques interfacial polymerization

The fastest growing desalination process is a membrane separation process called reverse osmosis (RO). The most remarkable advantage of RO is that it consumes little energy since no phase change is involved in the process. RO employs hydraulic pressure to overcome the osmotic pressure of the salt solution, causing water-selective permeation from the saline side of a membrane to the freshwater side as the membrane barrier rejects salts [1-4], Polymeric membranes are usually fabricated from materials such as cellulose acetate (CA), cellulose triacetate (CTA), and polyamide (PA) by the dry-wet phase inversion technique or by coating aromatic PA via interfacial polymerization (IFP) [5]. 

Mohammad et al. [29] fabricated NF composite membranes by the interfacial polymerization technique and studied the membrane s surface by AFM. The membrane support was prepared from a dope containing polysulfone (PSf) (P1835-BP Amoco) and poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) (Fluka) with JV-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) as the solvent. The top active layer was obtained through interfacial polymerization between trimesoyl chloride (TMC) in hexane and the aqueous phase containing bisphenol A (BPA). Table 5.9 shows the summary of the membrane preparation conditions. The first three membranes identified as PT-30, PT-45, and PT-60 differ in the period of interfacial reaction. The other three membranes identified as PC-05, PC-1, and PC-2 differ in terms of the concentration of BPA in the aqueous phase. The pore sizes determined by AFM and also calculated using the Donnan-steric-... 

A fiber or textile fabric prepared from insulating fiber materials is coated with an ICP polymer from a dilute solution or through interfacial polymerization techniques to yield a composite material with semiconducting surface conductivity. 

Template-free techniques have been extensively studied for the fabrication of conducting polymer nanomaterials fabrication. Compared with hard and soft template methods, these methodologies provide a facile and practical route to produce pure, uniform, and high quality nanofibers. Template-free methods encompass various methods such as electrochemical synthesis, chemical polymerization, aqueous/organic interfacial polymerization, radi-olytic synthesis, and dispersion polymerization. 

It has been indicated how interfacial morphology plays a crucial role in the transport properties of hybrid membranes, and conditions as close as possible to the ideal case must be achieved to ensure advanced separation performances. For this reason, several fabrication techniques have been developed to reduce as much as possible the influence of a nonideal interfacial morphology on the transport characteristics of the hybrid membranes. Among the most frequently used procedures there are solution blending, the sol-gel procedure, surface modification, and interfacial polymerization. In some cases a combination of these techniques is required to reach the best dispersion of the filler within the matrix. 

The majority of the commereial gas separation membranes are made by wet phase inversion method whieh results in an integrally skinned asymmetrie membrane. This method was first used by Loeb and Sourirajan to produee cellulose acetate membranes for desalination of sea water. An alternative method for making gas separation membranes uses an ultra-porous skinned asymmetric membrane over which a thin polymer film is deposited by either coating or by interfacial polymerization. This method was developed by Cadotte for the creation of in situ dense skin thin film composite membranes for water desalination. These membrane fabrication techniques were made commercially successful for gas separation membranes by a brilliant empirical discovery for in situ sealing of the tiny pinhole defects on the skin of the membrane. 

There are a number of processing techniques to fabricate nanofibers, which include electrospinning, drawing, template synthesis, phase separation, interfacial polymerization, self-assembly, and so on [39,40]. Among these, electrospinning process is a very effective method to make porous hydrophobic membranes. 

The initial studies by Cadotte on interfacially formed composite polyamide membranes indicated that monomeric amines behaved poorly in this membrane fabrication approach. This is illustrated in the data listed in Table 5.2, taken from the first public report on the NS-100 membrane.22 Only the polymeric amine polyethylenimine showed development of high rejection membranes at that time. For several years, it was thought that polymeric amine was required to achieve formation of a film that would span the pores in the surface of the microporous polysulfone sheet and resist blowout under pressure However, in 1976, Cadotte and coworkers reported that a monomeric amiri piperazine, could be interfacially reacted with isophthaloyl chloride to give a polyamide barrier layer with salt rejections of 90 to 98% in simulated seawater tests at 1,500 psi.4s This improved membrane formation was achieved through optimization of the interfacial reaction conditions (reactant concentrations, acid acceptors, surfactants). Improved technique after several years of experience in interfacial membrane formation was probably also a factor. 

G1 preforms can also be fabricated by an interfacial-gel polymerization technique. The principle is basically the same as that of the photo-copolymerization method discussed above, except for the mechanism that forms the initial gel phase. In this method, the core solution (the monomer) is placed in a polymer tube rather than in a glass tube. The gel phase in the photo-copolymerization method is referred to as a prepolymer with a conversion of less than 100%, whereas in this method the gel phase comprises the polymer layer on the inner wall of the tube swollen by the core monomer. The reaction is carried out under UV irradiation or heating. 

The interfacial-gel polymerization technique is particularly common in acrylic GI POP studies and enables the precise control of the refractive index profile, leading to a maximal bandwidth. However, this batch process requires many complicated procedures. Furthermore, the fiber length obtained at any one time is completely dependent on the preform size. This is a serious limitation in terms of fabrication costs. 

As the main part of the GI-POFs is composed of PMMA, the loss spectrum is nearly the same as that of SI-POF with PMMA core. The attenuation loss of GI-POF with the gel-copolymerization technique at 652 nm is 134 dB/kra Koike s group, Keio University, has used an interfacial-gel-polymerization technique where bro-mobenzene or other chemicals are used as unreactive components instead of vinyl phenyl acetate or vinyl benzoate in the interfacial-gel-copolymerization method. An attenuation loss of 90 dB/km at 572 nm was obtained. MMA-dg was also used as a monomer instead of MMA, and the deuterated polymer core GI-POF was successfully fabricated. Fluorinated acrylate monomer was also used to fabricate moisture-resistant GI-POF. Attenuation losses of 113 and 155 dB/km at 780 nm wavelength were obtained for deuterated and fluorinated POFs, respectively. These POFs are Oj pected to serve as the signal transmission medium with high information capacities in local area network systems. However, this GI-POF has not been commercially available so far because of the fabrication difficulty of the technique in a mass production level with reasonable attenuation loss and fabrication cost. 

---