Extraction solvent polarity

Extraction Solvent polarity Not adapted to target substances Produces emulsions Change solvent, use mixture of solvents... 

Liquid-liquid extraction LLE is a simple conventional technique for isolation and concentration. Which classes of compounds can be extracted from samples depends on a number of factors, such as type of sample (presence of particulate matter, ionic strength of the water), pH, type of extraction solvent (polarity of the solvent is the main factor), solvent-to-water ratio, and extraction procedure. Extraction at approximately pH 7 can be inefficient for some classes of compounds, e.g., phenols, which means that in such cases the sample pH has to be adjusted before extraction or consecutive extractions at... 

Extraction Solvent. Dimethyl sulfoxide is immiscible with alkanes but is a good solvent for most unsaturated and polar compounds. Thus, it can be used to separate olefins from paraffins (93). It is used in the Institute Fransais du Pntrole (IFF) process for extracting aromatic hydrocarbons from refinery streams (94). It is also used in the analytical procedure for determining polynuclear hydrocarbons in food additives (qv) of petroleum origin (95). 

Extraction and Extractive Distillation. The choice of an extraction or extractive distillation solvent depends upon its boiling point, polarity, thermal stabiUty, selectivity, aromatics capacity, and upon the feed aromatic content (see Extraction). Capacity, defined as the quantity of material that is extracted from the feed by a given quantity of solvent, must be balanced against selectivity, defined as the degree to which the solvent extracts the aromatics in the feed in preference to paraffins and other materials. Most high capacity solvents have low selectivity. The ultimate choice of solvent is deterrnined by economics. The most important extraction processes use either sulfolane or glycols as the polar extraction solvent. 

From empirical observation, ILs tend to be immiscible with non-polar solvents. They can therefore be washed or brought into contact with diethyl ether or hexane to extract non-polar reaction products. Among solvents of greater polarity, esters (ethyl acetate, for example) exhibit variable solubility with ILs, depending on the nature of the IL. Polar or dipolar solvents (including chloroform, acetonitrile, and methanol) appear to be totally miscible with all ILs (excepting tetrachloroaluminate IL and the like, which react). Among notable exceptions, [EMIMJCl and [BMIMJCl are insoluble in dry acetone. 

The solubility of iridoids depends on their state (free, glycosylated, acetylated), but usually they are extracted with polar solvents methanol, ethanol, aqueous alcohols, and rarely acetone. Iridoid glycosides are more or less stable some of them are very sensitive to acids and alkalis. Some iridoid glycosides such as aucubin suffer color modification after chemical or enzymatic hydrolysis they give first a blue to green... 

The most critical decision to be made is the choice of the best solvent to facilitate extraction of the drug residue while minimizing interference. A review of available solubility, logP, and pK /pKb data for the marker residue can become an important first step in the selection of the best extraction solvents to try. A selected list of solvents from the literature methods include individual solvents (n-hexane, " dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, acetone, acetonitrile, methanol, and water ) mixtures of solvents (dichloromethane-methanol-acetic acid, isooctane-ethyl acetate, methanol-water, and acetonitrile-water ), and aqueous buffer solutions (phosphate and sodium sulfate ). Hexane is a very nonpolar solvent and could be chosen as an extraction solvent if the analyte is also very nonpolar. For example, Serrano et al used n-hexane to extract the very nonpolar polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from fat, liver, and kidney of whale. One advantage of using n-hexane as an extraction solvent for fat tissue is that the fat itself will be completely dissolved, but this will necessitate an additional cleanup step to remove the substantial fat matrix. The choice of chlorinated hydrocarbons such as methylene chloride, chloroform, and carbon tetrachloride should be avoided owing to safety and environmental concerns with these solvents. Diethyl ether and ethyl acetate are other relatively nonpolar solvents that are appropriate for extraction of nonpolar analytes. Diethyl ether or ethyl acetate may also be combined with hexane (or other hydrocarbon solvent) to create an extraction solvent that has a polarity intermediate between the two solvents. For example, Gerhardt et a/. used a combination of isooctane and ethyl acetate for the extraction of several ionophores from various animal tissues. 

If the analyte contains either an acidic or a basic functionality, adjusting the pH of the extraction solvent to make the analyte either ionic or nonionic may be advantageous. To make an analyte that contains an acidic or basic functionality nonionic for extraction into a nonpolar solvent, a small amount (5% or less) of an organic acid (such as acetic acid or trifluoroacetic acid) or organic base (triethylamine) along with methanol (about 10%) can be added to diethyl ether or ethyl acetate. Conversely, buffered solutions can be used to control the pH precisely in such a way as to control the charge on an analyte and thus improve its extraction efficiency into polar solvents. 

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is a technique in which a supercritical fluid [formed when the critical temperature Tf) and critical pressure Pf) for the fluid are exceeded simultaneously] is used as an extraction solvent instead of an organic solvent. By far the most common choice of a supercritical fluid is carbon dioxide (CO2) because CO2 has a low critical temperature (re = 31.1 °C), is inexpensive, and is safe." SFE has the advantage of lower viscosity and improved diffusion coefficients relative to traditional organic solvents. Also, if supercritical CO2 is used as the extraction solvent, the solvent (CO2) can easily be removed by bringing the extract to atmospheric pressure. Supercritical CO2 itself is a very nonpolar solvent that may not have broad applicability as an extraction solvent. To overcome this problem, modifiers such as methanol can be used to increase the polarity of the SFE extraction solvent. Another problem associated with SFE using CO2 is the co-extraction of lipids and other nonpolar interferents. To overcome this problem, a combination of SFE with SPE can be used. Stolker et al." provided a review of several SFE/SPE methods described in the literature. 

Until this point, the sample preparation techniques under discussion have relied upon differences in polarity to separate the analyte and the sample matrix in contrast, ultraflltration and on-line dialysis rely upon differences in molecular size between the analyte and matrix components to effect a separation. In ultrafiltration, a centrifugal force is applied across a membrane filter which has a molecular weight cut-off intended to isolate the analyte from larger matrix components. Furusawa incorporated an ultrafiltration step into his separation of sulfadimethoxine from chicken tissue extracts. Some cleanup of the sample extract may be necessary prior to ultrafiltration, or the ultrafiltration membranes can become clogged and ineffective. Also, one must ensure that the choice of membrane filter for ultrafiltration is appropriate in terms of both the molecular weight cut-off and compatibility with the extraction solvent used. 

It is not uncommon that extraction techniques are unfairly compared. Appropriate interlaboratory studies are few. Soxhlet and sonication extraction (EPA methods 3540 and 3550, respectively) were compared in an interlaboratory study (129 participants) for PCBs in soil. Results from laboratories using Soxhlet extraction were significantly more accurate than those obtained using sonication, especially at higher concentrations, but with equal precision [196]. This is rationalised by the observation that the Soxhlet procedure presents the sample with fresh solvent so that the extraction solvent is never saturated, unlike the sonication procedure. Sonication is very sensitive to the solvent polarity, nonpolar solvents producing considerably less accurate results than polar solvents. It is not as sensitive to clean-up procedures as... 

Freitag and John [96] studied rapid separation of stabilisers from plastics. Fairly quantitative extraction (>90% of the expected content) of stabilisers from a powdered polymer was achieved by MAE within 3 to 6 min, as compared to 16 h of Soxhlet extraction for the same recovery. MAE and Soxhlet extraction have also been compared in the analysis of cyclic trimer in PET [113]. On the other hand, Ganzler et al. [128] compared the extraction yields for various types of compounds from nonpolymeric matrices for microwave irradiation with those obtained by the traditional Soxhlet or shake-flask extraction methods. Microwave extraction was more effective than the conventional methods, in particular in the case of polar compounds. As expected, the efficiency of the former is high especially when the extraction solvents contain water. With the high dipole moment of water, microwave heating is more... 

On-line SFE-pSFC-FTD, using formic or acetic acid modified CO2 as an extraction solvent, was used to analyse a dialkyltin mercaptide stabiliser in rigid PVC (Geon 87444) [114]. Hunt et al. [115] reported off-line SFE-pSFC-UV analysis of PVC/(DIOP, chlorinated PE wax, Topanol CA), using methanol as a modifier. Individual additives are unevenly extracted at lower pressures and temperatures, where extraction is incomplete. Topanol CA, the most polar of the three PVC additives studied, could not be fully extracted in the time-scale required (15-20min), even at the highest CO2 temperature and pressure obtainable. However, methanol-modified CO2 enhances extraction of Topanol CA. PVC film additives (DEHP, fatty acids, saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons) were also separated by off-line SFE-preparative SFC, and analysed by PDA and IR [116]. 

In hydroformylating with a polar ligand modified rhodium catalyst to give a relatively non-polar aldehyde product, after the flash column, the catalyst solution is extracted with a non-polar solvent. Polar catalyst recycles from the extractor to the reactor. The non-polar solvent is removed and recycled to the extractor (see Figure 2.6). 

---