Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Explanation subjectivity

We have seen various kinds of explanations of why may vary with 6. The subject may, in a sense, be bypassed and an energy distribution function obtained much as in Section XVII-14A. In doing this, Cerefolini and Re [149] used a rate law in which the amount desorbed is linear in the logarithm of time (the Elovich equation). [Pg.709]

Acrolein (H2C=CHCH=0) reacts with sodium azide (NaNj) in aqueous acetic acid to form a compound C3H5N3O in 71% yield Propanal (CH3CH2CH=0) when subjected to the same reaction conditions is recovered unchanged Suggest a structure for the product formed from acrolein and offer an explanation for the difference in reactivity between acrolein and propanal... [Pg.779]

Tlie next section of the patent is tided "The Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment", Q (Fig. lb), often a multipage work serving several functions. First, the detailed description should provide an illustration of the invention in both its broadest or simplest sense and in its most preferred sense. Any elements of the invention that the inventor beheves are crucial to the success or performance of the invention must also be included within this description. Further, tbi< description should provide an explanation of the invention that is definite and illustrative, so as to allow persons having nothing but die patent before diem to practice or use die invention in the manner intended. This description should be understood by those who work in the area that covers the subject matter of the patent. [Pg.28]

As can be seen from these equations and Figure 3, the head ingredients are static (pressure, y ), dynamic (velocity, F, and elevation, Z, components. A good explanation of this subject is available (15). [Pg.288]

Humans can not know the ultimate and detailed true reaction mechanism of any reaaJon, or the kinetics that can be derived from it.. Bodenstein (1906) studied the mechanism of the H2 + Br2 = 2 HBr reaction and after several decades of work and dozens of publications wrote the final paper on the subject. Within a few years one of his students published a correction to Bodenstein s explanations. [Pg.117]

Servos gives a beautifully clear explanation of the subject-matter of physical chemistry, as Ostwald pursued it. Another excellent recent book on the evolution of physical chemistry, by Laidler (1993) is more guarded in its attempts at definition. He says that it can be defined as that part of chemistry that is done using the methods of physics, or that part of physics that is concerned with chemistry, i.e., with specific chemical substances , and goes on to say that it cannot be precisely defined, but that he can recognise it when he sees it Laidler s attempt at a definition is not entirely satisfactory, since Ostwald s objective was to get away from insights which were specific to individual substances and to attempt to establish laws which were general. [Pg.26]

The preference for endo attack in 7,7-dimethylnorbomene is certainly steric in origin, with the 7-methyl substituent shielding the exo direction of approach. The origin of the preferred exo-attack in norbomene is more subject to discussion. A purely steric explanation views the endo hydrogens at C—5 and C—6 as sterically shieldihg the endo approach. There probably is also a major torsional effect Comparison of the exo and endo modes of reproach shows that greater torsional strain develops in the endo mode of... [Pg.176]

The distribution coefficient is an equilibrium constant and, therefore, is subject to the usual thermodynamic treatment of equilibrium systems. By expressing the distribution coefficient in terms of the standard free energy of solute exchange between the phases, the nature of the distribution can be understood and the influence of temperature on the coefficient revealed. However, the distribution of a solute between two phases can also be considered at the molecular level. It is clear that if a solute is distributed more extensively in one phase than the other, then the interactive forces that occur between the solute molecules and the molecules of that phase will be greater than the complementary forces between the solute molecules and those of the other phase. Thus, distribution can be considered to be as a result of differential molecular forces and the magnitude and nature of those intermolecular forces will determine the magnitude of the respective distribution coefficients. Both these explanations of solute distribution will be considered in this chapter, but the classical thermodynamic explanation of distribution will be treated first. [Pg.47]

This is one approach to the explanation of retention by polar interactions, but the subject, at this time, remains controversial. Doubtless, complexation can take place, and probably does so in cases like olefin retention on silver nitrate doped stationary phases in GC. However, if dispersive interactions (electrical interactions between randomly generated dipoles) can cause solute retention without the need to invoke the... [Pg.76]

Panel). Most of the basic processes were established almost a century and a half ago, but a coherent theoretical explanation was not available until the publication in 1938 of the classic paper by R, W. Gurney and N. F. Mott. (Pwc. Roy. Soc. A164, 151-67 (1938)). Since then the subject has stimulated a vast amount of fundamental research in wide areas of solid-state chemistry and physics. [Pg.1186]

In the light of what has been said above, little further explanation of the implications of the title of the present work is required. Its treatment of the subject of corrosion will centre round the control of the environmental interactions of metals and alloys used as materials of construction. [Pg.1406]

The use of the older restricted version of the Pauli principle has persisted, however, and is routinely employed to develop the electronic version of the periodic table. Modern chemistry appears to be committing two mistakes. Firstly, there is a rejection of the classical chemical heritage whereby the classification of elements is based on the accumulation of data on the properties and reactions of elements. Secondly, modem chemistry looks to physics with reverence and the false assumption that therein lies the underlying explanation to all of chemistry. Chemistry in common with all other branches of science appears to have succumbed to the prevailing tendency that attempts to reduce everything to physics (11). In the case of the Pauli principle, chemists frequently fall short of a full understanding of the subject matter, and... [Pg.13]

The reason for the exponential increase in the electron transfer rate with increasing electrode potential at the ZnO/electrolyte interface must be further explored. A possible explanation is provided in a recent study on water photoelectrolysis which describes the mechanism of water oxidation to molecular oxygen as one of strong molecular interaction with nonisoenergetic electron transfer subject to irreversible thermodynamics.48 Under such conditions, the rate of electron transfer will depend on the thermodynamic force in the semiconductor/electrolyte interface to... [Pg.512]


See other pages where Explanation subjectivity is mentioned: [Pg.457]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.478]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.875]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.845]    [Pg.1301]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.611]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.592]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.863]    [Pg.36]   


SEARCH



Explanation

© 2024 chempedia.info