Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Experimental techniques calculating rate constants

A prediction of AE /AEq to within 0.1 kcal/mol may produce a AG /AGq accurate to maybe 0.2 kcal/mol. This corresponds to a factor of 1.4 error (at T = 300 K) in the rate/equilibrium constant, which is poor compared to what is routinely obtained by experimental techniques. Calculating AG /AGq to within 1 kcal/mol is still only possible for fairly small systems. This corresponds to predicting the absolute rate constant, or the equilibrium distribution, to within a factor of... [Pg.306]

For a growing radical chain that has monomer 1 at its radical end, its rate constant for combination with monomer 1 is designated and with monomer 2, Similady, for a chain with monomer 2 at its growing end, the rate constant for combination with monomer 2 is / 22 with monomer 1, The reactivity ratios may be calculated from Price-Alfrey and e values, which are given in Table 8 for the more important acryUc esters (87). The sequence distributions of numerous acryUc copolymers have been determined experimentally utilizing nmr techniques (88,89). Several review articles discuss copolymerization (84,85). [Pg.166]

Pulsed source techniques have been used to study thermal energy ion-molecule reactions. For most of the proton and H atom transfer reactions studied k thermal) /k 10.5 volts /cm.) is approximately unity in apparent agreement with predictions from the simple ion-induced dipole model. However, the rate constants calculated on this basis are considerably higher than the experimental rate constants indicating reaction channels other than the atom transfer process. Thus, in some cases at least, the relationship of k thermal) to k 10.5 volts/cm.) may be determined by the variation of the relative importance of the atom transfer process with ion energy rather than by the interaction potential between the ion and the neutral. For most of the condensation ion-molecule reactions studied k thermal) is considerably greater than k 10.5 volts/cm.). [Pg.156]

Solid-surface room-temperature phosphorescence (RTF) is a relatively new technique which has been used for organic trace analysis in several fields. However, the fundamental interactions needed for RTF are only partly understood. To clarify some of the interactions required for strong RTF, organic compounds adsorbed on several surfaces are being studied. Fluorescence quantum yield values, phosphorescence quantum yield values, and phosphorescence lifetime values were obtained for model compounds adsorbed on sodiiun acetate-sodium chloride mixtures and on a-cyclodextrin-sodium chloride mixtures. With the data obtained, the triplet formation efficiency and some of the rate constants related to the luminescence processes were calculated. This information clarified several of the interactions responsible for RTF from organic compounds adsorbed on sodium acetate-sodium chloride and a-cyclodextrin-sodium chloride mixtures. Work with silica gel chromatoplates has involved studying the effects of moisture, gases, and various solvents on the fluorescence and phosphorescence intensities. The net result of the study has been to improve the experimental conditions for enhanced sensitivity and selectivity in solid-surface luminescence analysis. [Pg.155]

The reaction rate constant for each elementary reaction in the mechanism must be specified, usually in Arrhenius form. Experimental rate constants are available for many of the elementary reactions, and clearly these are the most desirable. However, often such experimental rate constants will be lacking for the majority of the reactions. Standard techniques have been developed for estimating these rate constants.A fundamental input for these estimation techniques is information on the thermochemistry and geometry of reactant, product, and transition-state species. Such thermochemical information is often obtainable from electronic structure calculations, such as those discussed above. [Pg.346]

The experimental points scatter uniformly on both sides of the line. Accordingly, it can be concluded that the tested rate equation should not be rejected. The slope, k, is 0.02 min. This is only a rough estimate of the rate constant because numerical and graphical differentiations are very inaccurate procedures. The slope was also calculated by the least squares technique minimizing the sum of squares... [Pg.310]

SOLUTION. Kinetic parameters are estimated by using the least squares technique, by minimizing the function defined as squared residuals between calculated and experimental rate constants ... [Pg.317]

This question was addressed by use of classical trajectory techniques with an ion-quadrupole plus anisotropic polarizability potential to determine the collision rate constant (k ). Over one million trajectories with initial conditions covering a range of translational temperature, neutral rotor state, and isotopic composition were calculated. The results for the thermally average 300 K values for are listed in the last column of Table 3 and indicate that reaction (11) for H2/H2, D2/D2, and HD /HD proceeds at essentially the classical collision rate, whereas the reported experimental rates for H2/D2 and D2/H2 reactions seem to be in error as they are significantly larger than k. This conclusion raises two questions (1) If the symmetry restrictions outlined in Table 2 apply, how are they essentially completely overcome at 300 K (2) Do conditions exist where the restriction would give rise to observable kinetic effects ... [Pg.173]

With the experimental techniques available at present, rate constants of diad formation cannot be determined directly. There is however a way to calculate the rate constants from the experimentally determined triad, diad, etc. fractions if the rate constant of propagation and the statistical model are known (e.g., a one-way mechanism, a two-way mechanism, enantiomorphic site model) (9, JO). Very few rate constants of propagation are available, however. [Pg.35]

The impeller method is a technique commonly used to determine rheologic properties of fluids subject to particle settling. The impeller method utilizes a viscometer along with Newtonian and non-Newtonian calibration fluids to obtain constants that relate shear stresses and shear rates to experimentally measured values of torque and rotational speed. Newtonian calibration fluids are used to determine the impeller constant, c, and non-Newtonian calibration fluids are used to calculate the shear rate constant, k. These constants are then used to aid in the determination of rheologic properties of a selected non-Newtonian fluid, such as wet grains. [Pg.724]

The fact is that the reaction free energies are hardly ever determined experimentally, but are simply calculated from the Rehm-Weller equation which will be discussed in detail in the next section [26]. There are still considerable technical problems in direct experimental measurements, because standard methods of calorimetry cannot cope with reactions in time scales of ns or ps but this is slowly changing with the advent of fast calorimetric techniques such as time-resolved photoacoustic spectroscopy [27] and thermal lensing [28] these are considered in the following section. Nevertheless, it appears that all the data currently used in the rate constant-energy plots simply use the Rehm-Weller equation (sometimes with various corrections) and it is obviously important to consider the assumptions built into this equation, its limitations, and possible improvements. [Pg.105]

The result of Fe +Cl O) 5(NO) is in good agreement with that determined by Kastin et al. (15) using the same experimental technique. For both Fe2+(EDTA)(NO) and Fe2+(NTA)(NO), the relaxation times due to the temperature jump were too fast to be measured. However, an upper limit of 10 /is was established for the relaxation times for both complexes. By use of this value with the equilibrium constants determined for Fe2+(EDTA)(NO) (16) and Fe2+(NTA)(NO) (10), the lower limits of formation rate constants were calculated to be 7 x 10 and 6 x 107 Z/nol -sec at 35 °C, which is in good agreement with that determined by the temperature-jump technique. From the results listed in Table I, we can conclude that the formation rate of Fe2+(EDTA)(NO) is at least 85 times faster than that of Fe2+(H20)5(N0), whereas, the dissociation rate of Fe2+(EDTA)(NO) is about 250 times slower than that of Fe2+(H20)5(N0) at 25 °C. [Pg.167]

In 1984 Krauss and Stevens described tests and applications of the effective potential method used to gain knowledge of the electronic structure of the molecules in order to analyze the accuracy of the experimentally deduced dissociation energies of refractory metal salts [3]. They used the development of ab initio theoretical methods for the calculation of potential energy surfaces, which further allowed the direct computation of certain rate constants. Transition state theory was also utilized for this computation of some rate constants. However, as discussed by Krauss and Stevens, as of the mid 1980 s computational techniques were not yet readily applied to atmospheric science. Computing power and theoretical methods since these seminal reports have been greatly advanced. [Pg.5]

An estimation of the TST rate constants was performed from the determined structures, energies, and vibrational modes of all of the reaction components. These constants are collected for both directions of the reactions (k, k i, k2, and k 2) at temperature 310 K in Table 7. Comparing the calculated constants for the dechlorination process in the 1st hydration step with the available experimental values,25-39 124 a qualitative agreement has been reached. It is clear that differences of several orders of magnitude in the values of the rate constants represent a variation of only a few kcal/mol on the hydration surface. Hence, the requirement for accuracy for such kinetic quantity is at the limit of the current computational techniques for the... [Pg.305]


See other pages where Experimental techniques calculating rate constants is mentioned: [Pg.184]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.491]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.447]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.42 ]




SEARCH



Calculating rate constants

Calculation techniques

Constants calculated

Experimental rate constant calculation

Rate constants, experimental

Rate, calculating

Rate-constant calculations

© 2024 chempedia.info