Experimental methods, interfacial processes

The success of SECM methodologies in providing quantitative information on the kinetics of interfacial processes relies on the availability of accurate theoretical models for mass transport and coupled kinetics, to allow the analysis of experimental data. The geometry of SECM is not conducive to exact analytical solution and hence a number of semiana-lytical [40,41], and numerical [8,10,42 46], methods have been introduced for a variety of problems. 

Cosolvent flooding is an experimental method for removing DNAPLs trapped below the water table. It involves injecting a highly concentrated aqueous mixture of solvents, such as alcohols, a chemical that is miscible with either phase in the aquifer. This process has the tendency to increase or enhance DNAPL (or LNAPL) solubility greatly, and to reduce the NAPL-water interfacial tension. Depending upon the phase behavior between the cosolvent and NAPL, a cosolvent flood can be developed to emphasize either enhanced dissolution (i.e., use of methane flooding for the dissolution of TCE) or NAPL mobilization. 

While transient photocurrent and photoinduced discharge techniques are the conventional methods for measuring photogeneration efficiencies, these cannot be readily employed in the presence of trapping. A further limitation is that it is difficult to separate the field dependence of the photogeneration process from field dependencies associated with an injection or interfacial process (Seki, 1970, 1972a). As such, it is difficult to apply the method to dispersions or two-phase materials. Experimental methods that may avoid these limitations are... 

Adaptation of existing experimental methods and theories, and development of new ones, to study (usually at reservoir conditions) the key phase, dispersion, and interfacial properties that control dispersion-based mobility processes, as determined from pore-level mechanisms and from other studies (D. H. Smith, Southwest American Chemical Society Meeting, Houston, November 19-21, 1986). 

Two timescales can be distinguished in the adsorption process of ionic species. The first timescale is characterized by the diffusion relaxation time of the EDL, = 1 / (D,k /) see Equations 5.32 and 5.34 above. It accounts for the interplay of electrostatic interactions and diffusion. The second scale is provided by the characteristic time of the used experimental method, tgxp, that is, the minimum interfacial age that can be achieved with the given method typically,... 

Accordingly, we recommend that advanced methods for characterizing interfacial structure and dynamics be developed vigorously. A panel was established by the committee to study and make recommendations on experimental methods. Its findings have been issued separately (NMAB 438-3, In Situ Characterization of Electrochemical Processes ), and its conclusions and recommendations are summarized in Chapter 6. Twelve specific recommendations are set forth for special emphasis in the near term. They call, in general, for new methods that (a) can characterize interfacial structure with greater chemical detail and with spatial resolution approaching the atomic scale and (b) can characterize dynamics in ways that will provide views of faster reactions. It is particularly important to establish new methods for in situ characterization—that is, direct observation in the electrochemical environment of interest. 

Experimental Methods for the Study of Interfacial Processes, both at the Surface of Sediment Particles and at In-Situ Sediment Boundaries"... 

The interfacial thickness. Lb, for crystallites formed in dilute solution is about 10 A, independently of the molecular weight [226]. Under these crystallization conditions, chain entanglements are minimal and there is no significant chain-mobility restraint on the process of crystallization. In addition to the interface, there is also a substantial disordered overlayer associated with crystals formed in solution [227]. Thus it is not surprising that results obtained using many different experimental methods indicate that crystals formed in dilute solution are only 85 %-90% crystalline [3]. They are not completely crystalline. 

These experimental results strongly suggested a significant contribution of other processes than just the aqueous reaction. On this issue, the HSS method revealed that the dissociated form of the -alkyl-dithizone did adsorb at the interface generated by vigorous agitation [5]. Therefore, the extraction rate was analyzed by introducing the interfacial reaction... 

---