Experimental Methods for Bulk Measurements

The two basic types of mechanical deformation, from a physical and molecular standpoint, are shear and dilatation. The experimental methods described in the preceding three chapters yield information primarily about shear only in extension measurements on hard solids does a perceptible volume change influence the results. By combining shear and extension measurements, the bulk properties can be calculated by difference, as for example in creep by equation 55 of Chapter 1, but the subtraction is unfavorable for achieving a precise result. Alternatively, bulk properties can be measured directly, or they can be obtained by combining data on shear and bulk longitudinal def ormations (corresponding to the modulus M discussed in Chapter 1), where the subtraction does not involve such a loss of precision. Methods for such measurements will now be described. They have been reviewed in more detail by Marvin and McKinney.  

An unfortunate usage of the term bulk viscosity is common among polymer chemists, in the sense of the ordinary shear viscosity of a polymer in bulk, as contrasted with its viscosity in dilute solution. In acoustics, bulk viscosity means the viscosity associated with a change in volume, and this definition fits in best with the nomenclature of viscoelasticity. In this book, the complex dynamic bulk viscosity refers to 77 = K /iu). 

---

Now it is known that this is not true for all substances the examples of cadmium, sodium chloride, and potassium chloride were cited in Section III. A, where the lack of wetting behavior led to an experimental method for measuring ffj,. If, however, this result is assumed to hold true, then the calculation reduces to a calculation of and a separate calculation or measurement of ff( . Skapski then estimates the difference in energy of the bonds broken to form the solid-vapor and liquid-vapor interfaces from the enthalpy of fusion of the bulk solid and the volume change on melting, and adds to it a small estimated contribution from the entropy change in the outer layer of the liquid and of the solid. The result is... 

We have been searching for experimental methods that can measure surface viscosities as low as 10 10 g/sec or measure the collisional dynamics that should correspond to the Mann-Cooper model. To qualify, the experimental method must respond to dilute monolayers having densities less than 1014 mojecules/cm2. From our experience with the ESR spin label technique for measuring bulk viscosity effects in ultrathin films (8),... 

The liquid liquid interface is an extremely thin liquid region with a few nanometers thickness, where it is predicted that properties such as cohesive energy density, electrical potential, dielectric constant, and viscosity are drastically changed along with the coordinate from an organic phase to an aqueous phase. Therefore, various specific chemical phenomena, which are not observed in bulk liquid phases, occur at liquid-liquid interfaces. However, the nature of the liquid liquid interface and its chemical function are still not fully understood. This situation is mainly due to the lack of suitable experimental methods, for the determination of the chemical species adsorbed at the interface and for the measurement of chemical reaction rates at the interface [1,2]. Recently, some new methods were developed in our laboratory [3], which attained a breakthrough in the study of interfacial reactions. 

Before we are in a position to discuss the viscosity of polymer melts, we must first give a quantitative definition of what is meant by viscosity and then say something about how this property is measured. This will not be our only exposure to experimental viscosity in this volume—other methods for determining bulk viscosity will be taken up in the next chapter and the viscosity of solutions will be discussed in Chap. 9—so the discussion of viscometry will only be introductory. Throughout we shall be concerned with constant temperature experiments conducted under nonturbulent flow conditions. 

A third method consists of measuring the time taken for a tagged panicle (e.g. radioactive or magnetic) to travel between two points 75 . The method gives results applicable only to an isolated particle which may not be representative of the bulk of the particles. These techniques can readily be used in experimental equipment but are not practicable for industrial plant. 

Conventional bulk measurements of adsorption are performed by determining the amount of gas adsorbed at equilibrium as a function of pressure, at a constant temperature [23-25], These bulk adsorption isotherms are commonly analyzed using a kinetic theory for multilayer adsorption developed in 1938 by Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (the BET Theory) [23]. BET adsorption isotherms are a common material science technique for surface area analysis of porous solids, and also permit calculation of adsorption energy and fractional surface coverage. While more advanced analysis methods, such as Density Functional Theory, have been developed in recent years, BET remains a mainstay of material science, and is the recommended method for the experimental measurement of pore surface area. This is largely due to the clear physical meaning of its principal assumptions, and its ability to handle the primary effects of adsorbate-adsorbate and adsorbate-substrate interactions. 

Once the density and compressibilities of mixed electrolyte solutions are known at 1 atm, values at high pressures can be made by using the secant bulk modulus equation of state. The major difficulty, at present, with using additivity methods to estimate the PVT properties of mixed electrolytes is the lack of experimental data for binary solutions over a wide range of concentrations and temperatures. Hopefully, in the near future we will be able to provide some of these data by measurements in our laboratory in Miami. 

In the next two subsections, we describe collections of calculations that have been used to probe the physical accuracy of plane-wave DFT calculations. An important feature of plane-wave calculations is that they can be applied to bulk materials and other situations where the localized basis set approaches of molecular quantum chemistry are computationally impractical. To develop benchmarks for the performance of plane-wave methods for these properties, they must be compared with accurate experimental data. One of the reasons that benchmarking efforts for molecular quantum chemistry have been so successful is that very large collections of high-precision experimental data are available for small molecules. Data sets of similar size are not always available for the properties of interest in plane-wave DFT calculations, and this has limited the number of studies that have been performed with the aim of comparing predictions from plane-wave DFT with quantitative experimental information from a large number of materials. There are, of course, many hundreds of comparisons that have been made with individual experimental measurements. If you follow our advice and become familiar with the state-of-the-art literature in your particular area of interest, you will find examples of this kind. Below, we collect a number of examples where efforts have been made to compare the accuracy of plane-wave DFT calculations against systematic collections of experimental data. 

Equation (24) now provides a means of parametrizing measured REE partition coefficients in a thermodynamically consistent manner. The bulk composition of the crystal yields from the method of Wood and Banno (1973). Similarly the composition of the melt yields (Mg/(Mg - - Fe))mgit directly. For any measured rare earth partition coefficient Dree, a value of Dg+ can be derived from the Brice equation using r from Equation (17) and E 2 fro Equation (16). Thus, for any given experimental measurement, the right-hand side of Equation (24) is defined. Wood and Blundy (1997)... 

---