Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Experimental determination of structure

In mass spectrometry, a minute sample (about 1 x 10 g) of the unknown organic compound is vaporised and injected into the mass spectrometer, where it is bombarded by high energy electrons. The energy is sufficient to knock electrons out of the molecules and, as a result, these molecules break into smaller positively charged ion fragments. [Pg.74]

The mass spectrum shown is that for ethanol (CHjCHjOH). The 100-peak with the highest m/z ratio provides the gram formula mass of the organic compound. In the example, this appears at m/z = 46 and confirms the gram formula mass of ethanol as 46 g. [Pg.74]

This peak arises from the so-called molecular ion [CHjCHjOH]  [Pg.74]

Mass spectrometry is often used alongside elemental microanalysis. [Pg.74]

The mass spectrum below is of a sample that was analysed previously which was found to have an empirical formula C H.  [Pg.74]


These genetic experiments clearly demonstrated that the proposed structural model for the binding of these proteins to the phage operators was essentially correct. The second a helix in the helix-turn-helix motif is involved in recognizing operator sites as well as in the differential selection of operators by P22 Cro and repressor proteins. However, a note of caution is needed many other early models of DNA-protein interactions proved to be misleading, if not wrong. Modeling techniques are more sophisticated today but are still not infallible and are certainly not replacements for experimental determinations of structure. [Pg.135]

Organic chemistry and instrumentai anaiysis Experimental determination of structure 1... [Pg.74]

Organic chemistry and instrumental analysis Experimental determination of structure 2... [Pg.76]

From the complementary nature of EFISHG and HRS, application of both techniques to (neutral and dipolar) molecules can lead to the measurement of more tensor components, to the experimental determination of structural parameters [22], or to the independent confirmation of experimentally obtained values for hyperpolarizability tensor components [25]. [Pg.3425]

Molecular modeling serves as a tool to the solution of various chemical, physical, and biological problems. The importance of molecular modeling of large organometallic and metallobiochemical systems is growing continuously. For such systems, experimental determination of structures may be both very difficult and expensive, while interpretation of the results is almost impossible without theoretical treatment. [Pg.70]

The PDB contains 20 254 experimentally determined 3D structures (November, 2002) of macromolecules (nucleic adds, proteins, and viruses). In addition, it contains data on complexes of proteins with small-molecule ligands. Besides information on the structure, e.g., sequence details (primary and secondary structure information, etc.), atomic coordinates, crystallization conditions, structure factors. [Pg.259]

The initial coordinates r(0) are usually obtained from experimentally determined molecular structures, mainly from X-ray crystallography and NMR experiments. Alternatively, the initial coordinates can be based on computer models generated by a variety of modeling techniques (see Chapters 14 and 15). Note, however, that even the experimentally determined strucmres must often undergo some preparation steps before they can be used as initial structures in a dynamic simulation. [Pg.48]

At this time, approximately one-half of all sequences are delectably related to at least one protein of known structure [8-11]. Because the number of known protein sequences is approximately 500,000 [12], comparative modeling could in principle be applied to over 200,000 proteins. This is an order of magnitude more proteins than the number of experimentally determined protein structures (—13,000) [13]. Furthermore, the usefulness of comparative modeling is steadily increasing, because the number of different structural folds that proteins adopt is limited [14,15] and because the number of experimentally determined structures is increasing exponentially [16]. It is predicted that in less than 10 years at least one example of most structural folds will be known, making comparative modeling applicable to most protein sequences [6]. [Pg.275]

Although experimental studies of DNA and RNA structure have revealed the significant structural diversity of oligonucleotides, there are limitations to these approaches. X-ray crystallographic structures are limited to relatively small DNA duplexes, and the crystal lattice can impact the three-dimensional conformation [4]. NMR-based structural studies allow for the determination of structures in solution however, the limited amount of nuclear overhauser effect (NOE) data between nonadjacent stacked basepairs makes the determination of the overall structure of DNA difficult [5]. In addition, nanotechnology-based experiments, such as the use of optical tweezers and atomic force microscopy [6], have revealed that the forces required to distort DNA are relatively small, consistent with the structural heterogeneity observed in both DNA and RNA. [Pg.441]

These results indicate that is it possible to change the fold of a protein by changing a restricted set of residues. They also confirm the validity of the rules for stability of helical folds that have been obtained by analysis of experimentally determined protein structures. One obvious impliction of this work is that it might be possible, by just changing a few residues in Janus, to design a mutant that flip-flops between a helical and p sheet structures. Such a polypeptide would be a very interesting model system for prions and other amyloid proteins. [Pg.370]

Molecular structure, experimental determination of, 324 Molecular velocities, distribution of, 131... [Pg.462]

Theoretical models available in the literature consider the electron loss, the counter-ion diffusion, or the nucleation process as the rate-limiting steps they follow traditional electrochemical models and avoid any structural treatment of the electrode. Our approach relies on the electro-chemically stimulated conformational relaxation control of the process. Although these conformational movements179 are present at any moment of the oxidation process (as proved by the experimental determination of the volume change or the continuous movements of artificial muscles), in order to be able to quantify them, we need to isolate them from either the electrons transfers, the counter-ion diffusion, or the solvent interchange we need electrochemical experiments in which the kinetics are under conformational relaxation control. Once the electrochemistry of these structural effects is quantified, we can again include the other components of the electrochemical reaction to obtain a complete description of electrochemical oxidation. [Pg.374]

The chemical bonding and the possible existence of non-nuclear maxima (NNM) in the EDDs of simple metals has recently been much debated [13,27-31]. The question of NNM in simple metals is a diverse topic, and the research on the topic has basically addressed three issues. First, what are the topological features of simple metals This question is interesting from a purely mathematical point of view because the number and types of critical points in the EDD have to satisfy the constraints of the crystal symmetry [32], In the case of the hexagonal-close-packed (hep) structure, a critical point network has not yet been theoretically established [28]. The second topic of interest is that if NNM exist in metals what do they mean, and are they important for the physical properties of the material The third and most heavily debated issue is about numerical methods used in the experimental determination of EDDs from Bragg X-ray diffraction data. It is in this respect that the presence of NNM in metals has been intimately tied to the reliability of MEM densities. [Pg.40]

K. Kuchitsu and S. J. Cyvin, Representation and Experimental Determination of the Geometry Of Free Molecules, in Molecular Structures and Vibrations, S. J. Cyvin, ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam (1972). [Pg.142]

FIGURE 2. Calculated high symmetry conformations (C2v, C2 and Dyd. S4, respectively) and experimentally determined molecular structures of 1,1-divinylcyclopropane (DVC) and tetravinylmethane (TVM) in Ci presentation with thermal probability plots of 50%... [Pg.29]


See other pages where Experimental determination of structure is mentioned: [Pg.497]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.851]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.637]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.851]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.903]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.575]   


SEARCH



Experimental Determination of

Experimental Determination of Molecular Structure

Structural determination, experimental

Structure determination, experimental

© 2024 chempedia.info