Excited state static properties

Static properties of some molecules ([193,277-280]). More recently, pairs of ci s have been studied [281,282] in greater detail. These studies arose originally in connection with a ci between the l A and 2 A states found earlier in computed potential energy surfaces for C2H in symmetry [278]. Similar ci s appear between the potential surfaces of the two lowest excited states A2 and B2 iit H2S or of 82 and A in Al—H2 within C2v symmetry [283]. A further, closely spaced pair of ci s has also been found between the 3 A and 4 A states of the molecule C2H. Here the separation between the twins varies with the assumed C—C separation, and they can be brought into coincidence at some separation [282]. 

To determine static properties of the SeO radical in KDP and DKDP, the temperature dependence of the hyperfine interaction between unpaired electron and Se (I = 1/2) nucleus was measured [53]. The hyperfine tensor component A, where the direction is along the c-axis, shows an isotope effect, because its value is higher in DKDP than in KDP. Furthermore, its value shows a jump at Tc for DKDP and a considerable temperature dependence in the PE phase of both crystals, approximated by the relation A (T) = A (0) - B coth(ro/T), where To 570 K for both crystals. It is interesting to note that A, similarly to the As NQR frequency and P isotropic chemical shift, should be constant in the PE phase if the two-state order-disorder mechanism of the corresponding tetrahedron holds. However, while the temperature dependencies of the As NQR frequency and P isotropic chemical shift in the PE phase were explained as originating from a six-state order-disorder mechanism [42] and additional displacive mechanism [46], respectively, here it was assumed that excitation of some extra lattice vibration mode with frequency Tq affects the hyperfine tensor components and causes the temperature dependence of A. ... 

Mott transition, 25 170-172 paramagnetic states, 25 148-161, 165-169 continuum model, 25 159-161 ESR. studies, 25 152-157 multistate model, 25 159 optical spectra, 25 157-159 and solvated electrons, 25 138-142 quantitative theory, 25 138-142 spin-equilibria complexes, 32 2-3, see also specific complex four-coordinated d type, 32 2 implications, 32 43-44 excited states, 32 47-48 porphyrins and heme proteins, 32 48-49 electron transfer, 32 45-46 race-mization and isomerization, 32 44—45 substitution, 32 46 in solid state, 32 36-39 lifetime limits, 32 37-38 measured rates, 32 38-39 in solution, 32 22-36 static properties electronic spectra, 32 12-13 geometric structure, 32 6-11 magnetic susceptibility, 32 4-6 vibrational spectra, 32 13 summary and interpretation... 

An excited state has a finite lifetime and so it has static properties, such as molecular shape (median bond lengths and angles) and dipole moment, like those of a ground-state molecule, that can in principle be determined experimentally. However, the lifetime of an excited state is short, often very short, and this restricts the range of techniques that can be employed to study such properties. Most of the available information comes from high-resolution absorption 01 emission spectra, particularly of small or symmetrical model compounds. The geometry of most other excited organic molecules has to be inferred from such results. 

IR, Raman and related phenomena) to describe with a static approach the salient aspects of phenomena, which are essentially of a dynamical nature [1], This regime was later shown to be essential for a correct description of the photophysical phenomena. It introduces in the QM formalism aspects that are not present in the standard formulation, particularly, that the excited states activated by the excitation process are not orthogonal to the fundamental one (a similar effect is present in the emission process). The orthogonality among states is a basic tenet of the standard formulation, and the selection rules are based on this property. The description obtained with this model is more realistic than the standard one, when the chromophore is immersed into a responsive medium. Discrete solvent simulation methods could hardly describe these effects. 

Whereas the distinction between collective and cooperative effects can appear artificial, it is obvious that, since optical responses are gs properties, their nonadditivity cannot be ascribed to the delocalized nature of excited states. On the other hand, static responses can be calculated from sum-over-state (SOS) expressions involving excited state energies and transition dipole moments [35]. And in fact tlie exciton model has been recently used by several authors to calculate and/or discuss linear and non-linear optical responses of mm [36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42]. But tlie excitonic model hardly accounts for cooperativity and one may ask if there is any link between collective effects related to the delocalized nature of exciton states and cooperative effects in the gs, related to the self-consistent dependence of tlie local molecular gs on the surrounding molecules. 

Recently an extensive review has been published covering the calculation of NLO properties in the solid state [44]. We refer the Interested reader to this work for an extensive coverage of previous literature devoted to intermolecular interactions and their effects on optical responses of mm. In this work we will discuss models for collective and cooperative effects as occurring in mm with particular emphasis on the relation between the description of excited states and linear and non-linear static optical responses. We will mention a few seminal papers where the concepts of collective and cooperative behavior appeared. The proposed references then follow a very personal and unavoidably incomplete view of the very rich literature in the field. 

---