Eutrophication sulfur

If only one pollutant contributes to an effect, e.g., nitrogen to eutrophication or sulfur to acidification, a unique critical load (CL) can be calculated and compared with deposition (Dep). The difference is termed the exceedance of the critical loads Ex = Dep— CL. 

The calculated values of critical loads for acid forming species of sulfur, and eutrophication and acid forming species of nitrogen, as well as species of heavy metals (Pb and Cd) characterize the sustainability of natural ecosystems surrounding the main... 

In accordance with the production plans (Odisharia et al 1994), the increase of emission rate for nitrogen oxides (NO ) in the area of Bovanenkovo gas exploration in Yamal peninsula will be during 2000-2015 (Figure 7). Emission of sulfur oxide will be practically permanent and will amount to about 470,000 tons per year. These data indicate also the growth of deposition rate for acid forming and eutrophication compounds in comparison with the present period (Table 1). 

Measurements of S cycling in Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin, and Lake Sempach, Switzerland, are used together with literature data to show the major factors regulating S retention and speciation in sediments. Retention of S in sediments is controlled by rates of seston (planktonic S) deposition, sulfate diffusion, and S recycling. Data from 80 lakes suggest that seston deposition is the major source of sedimentary S for approximately 50% of the lakes sulfate diffusion and subsequent reduction dominate in the remainder. Concentrations of sulfate in lake water and carbon deposition rates are important controls on diffusive fluxes. Diffusive fluxes are much lower than rates of sulfate reduction, however. Rates of sulfate reduction in many lakes appear to be limited by rates of sulfide oxidation. Much sulfide oxidation occurs anaerobically, but the pathways and electron acceptors remain unknown. The intrasediment cycle of sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation is rapid relative to rates of S accumulation in sediments. Concentrations and speciation of sulfur in sediments are shown to be sensitive indicators of paleolimnological conditions of salinity, aeration, and eutrophication. 

Existing data lend mixed support to the hypothesis that sulfate reduction is limited by availability of electron donors. Laboratory studies have shown that sulfate reduction in sediments can be stimulated by addition of carbon substrates or hydrogen (e.g., 85, 86). Increases in storage of reduced sulfur in sediments caused by or associated with addition of organic matter (108, 109) also have been interpreted as an indication that sulfate reduction is carbon-limited. Addition of nutrients to Lake 227 in the Experimental Lakes Area resulted in increased primary production and increased storage of sulfur in sediments (110, 111). Natural eutrophication has been observed to cause the same effect (23, 24, 112). Small or negligible decreases in sulfate concentrations in pore waters of ultra-oligotrophic lakes have been interpreted... 

The studies cited do not clarify what factors determine rates of sulfate reduction in lake sediments. The absence of seasonal trends in reduction rates suggests that temperature is not a limiting factor. Rates of sulfate reduction are not proportional to such crude estimates of carbon availability as sediment carbon content or carbon sedimentation rate, although net reduction and storage of reduced sulfur in sediments often does increase with increasing sediment carbon content. Measured rates of sulfate reduction are not proportional to lake sulfate concentrations, and the relative rates of sulfate reduction and methanogenesis in a variety of lakes do not indicate that sulfate diffusion becomes limiting in eutrophic lakes. Direct comparison of diffusion and reduction rates indicates that diffusion of sulfate into sediments cannot supply sulfate at the rates at which it is reduced. Neither hydrolysis of sulfate... 

Figure 8B. Within individual cores from three of these same lakes, a similarly strong correlation is observed between S and C concentrations. Within each core, C concentrations increase toward the surface because of increasing eutrophication in recent years. The C S ratios indicate that most of the sulfur is not derived from seston (ratio indicated by line labeled algal C S), but from sulfate reduction. Increasing inputs of carbon cause increases in S from both seston and sulfate reduction. Even after eutrophication, C S values remain below the ratio of 2.5 (marine line) typically observed in marine...

Paleolimnological Conditions. Because of the interplay between primary production, oxygen content of bottom waters, and the sulfur content and speciation of sediments, sediment profiles of S probably preserve records of paleolimnological conditions. Several studies (23-25, 205) point to increased S content of sediments as a result of eutrophication. Mechanisms involve both rates of S supply to sediments (seston deposition and diffusive gradients) and rates of S reduction and oxidation. The relative S enrichment... 

The sulfide produced by sulfate reducers may be oxidized by several sulfur bacteria. Common among these are members of Beggiotoales and Thiobacteriaceae, as well as photosynthetic bacteria of Thiorhodaceae and Chlorobacteriaceae, which are common in eutrophic lakes in which the hypolimnion is depleted in oxygen. An example is the development... 

Buffle, J., Zali, O., Zumstein, J. and De Vitre, R.R. (1987) Analytical methods for the direct determination of inorganic and organic species seasonal changes of iron, sulfur, and pedogenic and aquogenic organic constituents in the eutrophic Lake Bret, Switzerland. Sci. Total Environ., 64, 41-59. 

CRITICAL LOAD CONCEPT FOR IMPACT-ORIENTED EMISSION ABATEMENT STRATEGY OF SULFUR AND NITROGEN ACID-FORMING AND EUTROPHICATION COMPOUNDS... 

Using the maps of CL and Ex for acid forming and eutrophication compounds of sulfur and nitrogen, discuss the advantages that have been achieved in Europe in emission reduction during last two decades. 

Among all EHS aspects, the safety concerns were the most significant. The use of flammable substances, especially hydrogen in combination with noble metal catalysts in C and D and possible peroxide formations in D, has to be addressed. Toxicity was a minor issue in all routes, except perhaps for sulfuric and hydrochloric acid, which have a very low workplace threshold value. In contrast, the eutrophication potential could be a major issue for the biochemical routes A and B. 

Two wetland ecosystems (a) highly eutrophic wetland receiving secondarily treated effluent containing nitrate and sulfate (nitrate nitrogen = 20 mg L and sulfate sulfur = 50 mg L and (b) oligotrophic wetland with water inputs only from rainfall. Which wetland potentially would produce more methane and why Assume any initial conditions, but justify all your assumptions. 

---