Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Equal potential surface model

Fig. 2. A model of growth processes for (a) a hollow nanoparticle and, (b) a nanotube curved lines depicted around the tube tip show schematically equal potential surfaces. Fig. 2. A model of growth processes for (a) a hollow nanoparticle and, (b) a nanotube curved lines depicted around the tube tip show schematically equal potential surfaces.
The diffusion process in general may be viewed as the model for specific well-defined transport problems. In particle diffusion, one is concerned with the transport of particles through systems of particles in a direction perpendicular to surfaces of constant concentration in a viscous fluid flow, with the transport of momentum by particles in a direction perpendicular to the flow and in electrical conductivity, with the transport of charges by particles in a direction perpendicular to equal-potential surfaces. [Pg.307]

The parameters of the model potential (52) have been fitted (separately for Vs and V3) to ab initio energy surfaces calculated at the MP4 level and corrected for the basis set superposition error. The parameters of the additive potential Vs were fitted to 65 calculated points on the potential curve of Bes, the parameters of the 3-body potential V3 were fitted to the EalBea) potential surface with total number of calculated points equal to 108. It is important to note that in the fitting procedure we find the sum (or difference) of exchange and dispersion terms for each m-body potentials V . This sum is correct for all distances considered. But we cannot expect the same from the absolute... [Pg.150]

The necessity of introducing a combinatorial contribution to the chemical potential is a result of the neglect of size effects in the thermodynamics of pairwise interacting surface models. It also appears in lattice models that do not allow for a realistic representation of molecular sizes and are often simplified to models of equally sized lattice objects. The task of the combinatorial contribution is to represent the chemical potential of virtually homogeneous interacting objects of different size in 1 mol of a liquid mixture of a given composition with respect to the size and shape of the molecules. [Pg.239]

In principle, ab initio calculations of potential surfaces can be accompanied by ab initio evaluations of property surfaces. However, this is likely to be a cumbersome task. On the other hand, if many properties reflect polarization changes in the electronic structures of the interacting species, then property surfaces should be well-suited to modeling. Indeed, the potential surfaces and property surfaces can be put on an equal footing via evaluation of the electrical influence of surrounding species (i.e., fields, field gradients, and so on). [Pg.28]

The use of the same potential surface has allowed a detailed comparison of results obtained by trajectory calculations and by calculations using the transition-state model 199>. In the H + H2 reaction, the two assumptions incorporated in transition-state theory, i.e. equilibrium between transition state and reactants, and transmission coefficient equal to unity, seem to hold very well, but in the colhnear H +HBr H2 +Br reaction the transmission coefficient is found to be less than one, while in the reverse reaction H2 +Br - H +HBr the equilibrium condition is not satisfied. [Pg.41]

By restricting this article to FP calculations, we exclude the large body of ab initio computational work based on the cluster as a surface model. Other reviews compare both proaches [2]. We likewise do not consider semi-empirical methodologies or pair-potential methods. A very recent comprehensive look at FP calculations in theory and in practice is that of Lindan et al. [6]. Equally, Ref. [7] is a review aimed somewhat at the geological community, discussing atomistic and ab initio methods for modelling minerals. [Pg.299]

The first term of Eq.(2.330a) equals the surface-dipole potential, equals the Fermi level Ef. Within the jellium model G(n) is given by itz ... [Pg.163]

The vibrational spectra S co) after the second pulse in the cases of t = 134 and 201 fs are shown in Fig. 7.8, which clearly indicate that the amplitude of the hg(l) mode is enhanced for t = 134 fs and the predominant mode is switched to the ag(l) mode for t = 201 fs. In short, a Raman active mode is strongly excited if r is chosen to equal an integer multiple of its vibrational period TVib, and the energy of the mode takes the minimum if x is equal to a half-integer multiple of Tvib. This is known to be valid for the harmonic oscillator model. We proved that this is also the case for the potential surface of highly excited Ceo which includes anharmonic mode couplings by nature. [Pg.165]

If we now assume that this surface at temperature T is in equilibrium with a gas then the adsorption rate equals the desorption rate. Since the atoms/molecules are physisorbed in a weak adsorption potential there are no barriers and the sticking coefficient (the probability that a molecule adsorbs) is unity. This is not entirely consistent since there is an entropic barrier to direct adsorption on a specific site from the gas phase. Nevertheless, a lower sticking probability does not change the overall characteristics of the model. Hence, at equilibrium we have... [Pg.184]

The physical meaning of the g (ion) potential depends on the accepted model of an ionic double layer. The proposed models correspond to the Gouy-Chapman diffuse layer, with or without allowance for the Stem modification and/or the penetration of small counter-ions above the plane of the ionic heads of the adsorbed large ions. " The experimental data obtained for the adsorption of dodecyl trimethylammonium bromide and sodium dodecyl sulfate strongly support the Haydon and Taylor mode According to this model, there is a considerable space between the ionic heads and the surface boundary between, for instance, water and heptane. The presence in this space of small inorganic ions forms an additional diffuse layer that partly compensates for the diffuse layer potential between the ionic heads and the bulk solution. Thus, the Eq. (31) may be considered as a linear combination of two linear functions, one of which [A% - g (dip)] crosses the zero point of the coordinates (A% and 1/A are equal to zero), and the other has an intercept on the potential axis. This, of course, implies that the orientation of the apparent dipole moments of the long-chain ions is independent of A. [Pg.41]


See other pages where Equal potential surface model is mentioned: [Pg.940]    [Pg.940]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.503]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.1776]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.1505]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.77]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.940 ]




SEARCH



Equal

Equaling

Equality

Equalization

Model potential

Surface potential model

© 2024 chempedia.info