Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Enzymes salinity

The era of modem enzyme technology began in 1874 when the Danish chemist Christian Hansen produced the first industrial batches of chymosin by extracting dried calves stomachs with saline solutions. [Pg.284]

Compounds that affect activities of hepatic microsomal enzymes can antagonize the effects of methyl parathion, presumably by decreasing metabolism of methyl parathion to methyl paraoxon or enhancing degradation to relatively nontoxic metabolites. For example, pretreatment with phenobarbital protected rats from methyl parathion s cholinergic effects (Murphy 1980) and reduced inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity in the rat brain (Tvede et al. 1989). Phenobarbital pretreatment prevented lethality from methyl parathion in mice compared to saline-pretreated controls (Sultatos 1987). Pretreatment of rats with two other pesticides, chlordecone or mirex, also reduced inhibition of brain acetylcholinesterase activity in rats dosed with methyl parathion (2.5 mg/kg intraperitoneally), while pretreatment with the herbicide linuron decreased acetylcholine brain levels below those found with methyl parathion treatment alone (Tvede et al. 1989). [Pg.115]

Organophosphates, such as methyl parathion, are known to inhibit cholinesterase activity. A method has been developed to measure the extent of this inhibition and relate it to organophosphate exposure (EPA 1980d Nabb and Whitfield 1967). In this EPA-recommended method, blood is separated into plasma and red blood cell fractions. The fractions are treated with saline solution, brought to pH 8 with sodium hydroxide, and dosed with acetylcholine perchlorate. The ensuing acetic acid releasing enzyme reaction... [Pg.177]

In contrast, following a treatment regimen of 20 mg/kg MDMA, there were no significant differences in the density of [3H]mazindol-labeled norepinephrine (NE) uptake sites (fmol/mg protein) in the frontal cerebral cortex between saline-treated (159 17) and MDMA-treated (152 5) animals. With respect to the dose of MDMA, serotonin levels appeared to be more readily decreased (45 percent reduction at 5 mg/kg), while comparable reductions in 5-HlAA levels and serotonin uptake sites were noted only at 10 or 20 mg/kg MDMA. This apparent discrepancy among the three serotonergic markers measured in the present study may relate to effects of lower doses of MDMA on synthetic enzyme activity (i.e., TPH), whereas the effects of higher doses of MDMA in reducing all three markers may relate in part to effects on TPH activity and in part to destruction of serotonin neurons as evidenced by decreases in serotonin uptake sites. [Pg.198]

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Li and Li developed an ELISA procedure for imidacloprid to determine its residues in coffee cherry and bean extracts. A 25-g amount of sample extracted with 300 mL of methanol and 1% sulfuric acid (3 1, v/v) for 3 min. An aliquot of the sample extract (0.5 mL) is mixed with 1 mL of water and a gentle stream of nitrogen is used to evaporate methanol. The solution is then extracted with 1 mL of ethyl acetate, the extract is reconstituted in 1 mL of PBST (phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20) and competitive ELISA is performed to quantify imidacloprid in the extract. Eor methanol extracts of coffee cherries and beans fortified with imidacloprid at 0.5 mgL recoveries of imidacloprid by the ELISA method were 108 and 94, respectively. [Pg.1133]

Continue to wash the gel with 0.15M NaCl (saline solution) until the absorbance at 280nm is down to baseline. The protein eluting from the column at this point is unconjugated enzyme. [Pg.815]

M.L. Salin and W.W. Wilson, Porcine superoxide dismutase. Isolation and characterization of a relatively basic cuprozinc enzyme. Molec. Cell Biochem. 36, 157-161 (1981). [Pg.206]

A potentially more sensitive and selective approach involves reaction of formic acid with a reagent to form a chromophore or fluorophore, followed by chromatographic analysis. A wide variety of alkylating and silylating reagents have been used for this purpose. Two serious drawbacks to this approach are that inorganic salts and/or water interfere with the derivatisation reaction, and these reactions are generally not specific for formic acid or other carboxylic acids. These techniques are prone to errors from adsorption losses, contamination, and decomposition of the components of interest. Enzymic techniques, in contrast, are ideal for the analysis of non-saline water samples, since they are compatible with aqueous media and involve little or no chemical or physical alterations of the sample (e.g., pH, temperature). [Pg.76]

As a consequence of the previous considerations Kieber et al. [75] have developed an enzymic method to quantify formic acid in non-saline water samples at sub-micromolar concentrations. The method is based on the oxidation of formate by formate dehydrogenase with corresponding reduction of /3-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (j6-NAD+) to reduced -NAD+(/3-NADH) jS-NADH is quantified by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography with fluorimetric detection. An important feature of this method is that the enzymic reaction occurs directly in aqueous media, even seawater, and does not require sample pre-treatment other than simple filtration. The reaction proceeds at room temperature at a slightly alkaline pH (7.5-8.5), and is specific for formate with a detection limit of 0.5 im (SIN = 4) for a 200 xl injection. The precision of the method was 4.6% relative standard deviation (n = 6) for a 0.6 xM standard addition of formate to Sargasso seawater. Average re-... [Pg.76]

The popular acids for deprotection by acidolysis are hydrogen fluoride for benzyl-based protectors and trifluoroacetic acid for rerr-butyl-based protectors. The use of hydrogen fluoride for deprotection emerged from the observation that it is a good solvent for dissolving enzymes (because of the N-to-0 acyl shift see Section 6.6), and that the enzymatic activity is recovered (O-to-N acyl shift) in saline solution. Two different approaches are employed for removal of benzyl-based... [Pg.190]

In Chapter 4, we saw how conservative chemicals are used to trace the pathway and rates of water motion in the ocean. True conservative behavior is exhibited by a relatively small number of chemicals, such as the major ions and, hence, salinity. In contrast, most of the minor and trace elements display nonconservative behavior because they readily undergo chemical reactions under the environmental conditions found in seawater. The rates of these reactions are enhanced by the involvement of marine organisms, particularly microorganisms, as their enzymes serve as catalysts. Rates are also enhanced at particle interfaces for several reasons. First, microbes tend to have higher growth rates on particle surfaces. Second, the solution in direct contact with the particles tends to be highly enriched in reactants, thereby increasing reaction probabilities. Third, adsorption of solutes onto particle surfaces can create fevorable spatial orientations between reactants that also increases reaction probabilities. [Pg.101]

There is a family of enzymes that catalyze the attachment of amino acids to then-cognate tRNAs, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. There is one or more of these enzymes for each of the 20 amino acids that occur commonly in proteins. Each of these enzymes recognizes (a) a specific amino acid and (b) its cognate tRNA. Imagine a soup of 20 amino acids and 20 tRNAs, one for each amino acid. For example, the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase for, saline would specifically pick valine out of the soup and catalyze its attachment to the tRNA for valine, tRNA . Simply, we can write the product of the reaction as val-tRNA . This is a lovely example of the role of molecular recognition in a critical life process. [Pg.172]

The biotransformation enzyme GST showed significant and unambiguous decreased responses compared to references but it did not correlate with contamination levels for PCBs and PAHs. Since it appeared to be influenced by salinity differences it would seem to have little value as an estuarine biomarker. [Pg.29]


See other pages where Enzymes salinity is mentioned: [Pg.279]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.422]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.638]    [Pg.653]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.2061]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.343]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.22 ]




SEARCH



Saline

Salinity

Salinity, saline

Salinization

© 2024 chempedia.info