Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Enzyme biosensors physical entrapment

Many different types of techniques for protein immobilization have been developed using, in most cases, enzyme sensors. Early studies of enzyme biosensors often employed thick polymer membranes (thickness 0.01-1 mm) in which enzymes are physically entrapped or chemically anchored. The electrode surface was covered with the enzyme-immobilized polymer membranes to prepare electrochemical enzyme sensors. Although these biosensors functioned appropriately to... [Pg.147]

During the last decade, immobilization of oxidase type enzymes by physical entrapment in conducting or ionic polymers has gained in interest, particularly in the biosensor field. This was related to the possibility for direct electron tranfer between the redox enzyme and the electroconducting polymers such as polypyrrole (1,2), poly-N-methyl pyrrole (3), polyindole (4) and polyaniline (5) or by the possibility to incorporate by ion-exchange in polymer such as Nafion (6) soluble redox mediators that can act as electron shuttle between the enzyme and the electrode. [Pg.28]

Because enzymes present such an attractive possibility for achieving chemical selectivity, enzyme electrodes were the first enzymatic chemical sensors (or first biosensors) made. The early designs used any available method of immobilization of the enzyme at the surface of the electrode. Thus, physical entrapment using dialysis membranes, meshes, and various covalent immobilization schemes have been... [Pg.168]

The mode of immobilization, as well as the source and extent of purification of the enzyme, are important factors in determining the lifetime of the bio-catalyst. Generally, the lifetime of a soluble enzyme electrode is about one week or 25-50 assays, and the physically entrapped polyacrylamide electrodes are satisfactory for about 50-100 assays, depending primarily on the degree of care exercised in the preparation of the polymer. The chemically attached enzyme can be kept for years, if used infrequendy. In frequent use, the GOD electrode has a lifetime of over one year and can be used for over 1000 assays. For 1-amino acid oxidase or uricase (100) biosensors, about 200-1000 assays per electrode can be obtained, depending on the immobilization technique. [Pg.87]

Pyruvate oxidase requires the presence of thiamine pyrophosphate (0.1 mmol/1) and Ca2+ (2.5 mmol/1) for maximum activity. It should be used in 40 mmol/1 Tris buffer, pH 6.5-7.5, containing 0.5 mmol/1 phosphate. At higher phosphate concentrations substrate inhibition occurs this effect has been utilized in a phosphate sensor based on immobilized PyOD (Tabata and Murachi, 1983). Since PyOD is relatively unstable, for biosensors the enzyme has been immobilized by physical entrapment in, e.g., collagen (Mizutani et al., 1980), poly(vinyl chloride) and acetylcellulose (Kihara et al., 1984a,b). [Pg.135]

In addition to nucleic acids, enzymes have also been incorporated into conducting a polymer matrix for biosensor applications. As a transducer, a CP can convert the chemical response into an electric current. To enhance the sensitivity and the response time, fabrication of CPs/enzyme nanocomposites with large surface area is a meaningful objective. Syu and Chang demonstrated the immobilization of urease onto PPy nanotubes over carbon paper substrate by a physical entrapment approach [124]. The composite electrodes exhibited a detection sensitivity for the determination of urea of 53.74 mVdecade and a detection limit on the urea concentration of 1.0 pM. Furthermore, the composite electrode shows rapid response, storage stability and reusability. Lipase can also be covalently immobilized... [Pg.701]

In order to make a useful biosensor, enzyme has to be properly attached to the transducer with maintained enzyme activity. This process is known as enzyme immobilization. The choice of immobilization method depends on many factors such as the nature of the enzyme, the type of transducer used, the physiochemical properties of analyte, and the operating conditions [73]. The major requirement out of all these is its maximum activity in immobilized microenvironment. Enzyme-based electrodes provide a tool to combine selectivity of enzyme toward particular analyte and the analytical power of electrochemical devices. The amperometric transducers are highly compatible when enzymes such as urease, generating electro-oxidizable ions, are used [74]. The effective fabrication of enzyme biosensor based on how well the enzyme bounds to the transducer surface and remains there during use. The enzyme molecules dispersed in solutions will have a freedom of their movement randomly. Enzyme immobilization is a technique that prohibits this freedom of movement of enzyme molecules. There are four basic methods of immobilizing enzymes on support materials [75] and they are physical adsorption, entrapment, covalent bonding, and cross-linking, as shown in the Fig. 36. [Pg.256]

Similarly to the above-mentioned entrapment of proteins by biomimetic routes, the sol-gel procedure is a useful method for the encapsulation of enzymes and other biological material due to the mild conditions required for the preparation of the silica networks [54,55]. The confinement of the enzyme in the pores of the silica matrix preserves its catalytic activity, since it prevents irreversible structural deformations in the biomolecule. The silica matrix may exert a protective effect against enzyme denaturation even under harsh conditions, as recently reported by Frenkel-Mullerad and Avnir [56] for physically trapped phosphatase enzymes within silica matrices (Figure 1.3). A wide number of organoalkoxy- and alkoxy-silanes have been employed for this purpose, as extensively reviewed by Gill and Ballesteros [57], and the resulting materials have been applied in the construction of optical and electrochemical biosensor devices. Optimization of the sol-gel process is required to prevent denaturation of encapsulated enzymes. Alcohol released during the... [Pg.6]


See other pages where Enzyme biosensors physical entrapment is mentioned: [Pg.380]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.2523]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.1376]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.2360]    [Pg.2361]    [Pg.1378]    [Pg.1379]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.1041]    [Pg.967]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.504]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.1035]    [Pg.359]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.212 ]




SEARCH



Biosensor enzyme

Entrapment

Physical entrapment

© 2024 chempedia.info