Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Environment chronic risk assessment

For risk assessment purposes, the relative potency of AP and APEO has been evaluated by several authorities, initially on the basis of aquatic toxicity. In the UK, the Environment Agency used a QSAR approach [26] to derive the potencies listed in Table 7.3.2. Environment Canada used two approaches to characterise risks of NP, NPEO, and NPEC [27]. In the distributional approach, relative toxicities were proposed based on categorising acute and chronic toxicities. These are listed in Table 7.3.2. In addition a conservative approach was used. [Pg.929]

Results of human health risk assessment indicated that there was no unacceptable inhalation nor dietary chronic/carcinogenic risk of toxicological concern associated with a lifetime exposure of Hong Kong residents to the current level of POPs contamination in the local environment and locally consumed foods. [Pg.363]

To ensure that chemical contamination is rednced to safe concentrations at stockpile and NSCM sites before they are used for residential, occupational, or wildlife purposes, the U.S. Army requested that health-based exposure limits for GA, GB, GD, VX, sulfur mustard, and lewisite be developed to protect the pnblic and the environment. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) was asked to conduct the health risk assessments and propose chronic oral reference doses (RfDs) and, where... [Pg.18]

Environment Agency, Guidance on Site Specific Assessment of Chronic Risks to Human Health from Contamination, Environment Agency, Bristol, 2001. [Pg.55]

The presence of PCDD in the environment and the acute and chronic toxicity of 2,3,7,8- TCDD and similarly substituted congeners in animals raise concern. How serious should this concern be and what actions are warranted to relieve this concern These questions are addressed by a risk assessment... [Pg.7]

This simple statement has profound implications in the management of risk, i.e., that even toxic substances can be effectively managed through control of exposure, at least in industrial environments, and even substances typically thought to be safe can become toxic if exposure is excessive. Although the hazard-exposure relationship suggests that risk is eliminated if exposure is zero, in practice achievement of zero risk is not possible. Under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) carries out three risk assessments one each for acute and chronic... [Pg.5]

A knowledge of chronic and sub-acute toxic effects is the basis of a risk-assessment procedure which is closer to natural conditions. It is decisive to know what concentration of surfactant causes no observable effects any more. For the quantitative description of a chronic exposure situation, the NOEC value is used. By the eventual use of additional safety factors a so-called PNEC (predicted no effect concentration) value can be derived. The latter describes a situation where in the environment no deleterious effects should be expected any more. Aquatic toxicity and biological degradation are closely connected with each other insofar as a... [Pg.519]

Lewis, M. A., Chronic toxicities of surfactants and detergent builders to algae a review and risk assessment, Eco-tox. Environ. Safe, 20, 123-140 (1990). [Pg.535]

This gives an example of fate modeling in which the risks of an insect growth inhibitor, CGA-72662, in aquatic environments were assessed using a combination of the SWRRB and EXAMS mathematical models.. Runoff of CGA-72662 from agricultural watersheds was estimated using the SWRRB model. The runoff data were then used to estimate the loading of CGA-72662 into the EXAMS model for aquatic environments. EXAMS was used to estimate the maximum concentrations of CGA-72662 that would occur in various compartments of the defined ponds and lakes. The maximum expected environmental concentrations of CGA-72662 in water were then compared with acute and chronic toxicity data for CGA-72662 in fish and aquatic invertebrates in order to establish a safety factor for CGA-72662 in aquatic environments. [Pg.249]


See other pages where Environment chronic risk assessment is mentioned: [Pg.90]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.881]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.2734]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.89]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.93 , Pg.249 , Pg.288 ]




SEARCH



Chronic risk assessment

Environment risk assessment

© 2024 chempedia.info