Endosulfan, estrogenic activity

In vivo studies in animals suggest that endosulfan may disrupt normal reproductive hormone levels in male animals, but that it is not an endocrine disrupter in females. Persistent depressed testicular testosterone was seen in male rats after intermediate duration oral exposures to endosulfan. In ovariectomized female rats, orally administered endosulfan did not induce normal development of female reproductive tissues, and in female mice and immature female rats, acute parenteral exposure to endosulfan did not affect several endocrine-related end points. In vitro studies have evaluated endosulfan for estrogen receptor (ER) and cytosolic protein binding affinity, ER-mediated reporter gene expression, estrogenic induction of cell proliferation, and alteration of relative abundance of active estradiol metabolites. Overall, in vitro evidence in favor of endosulfan estrogenicity indicates relatively weak potency compared to 17[3-estradiol. Apparently contradictory results were reported in different... 

Over the last decades, large amounts of different man-made chemicals which can act as weak estrogens have been released into the terrestrial and aquatic environment and are distributed world-wide. Classical environmental estrogens are pesticides, such as o,p -DDT, and its metabohtes o,p -DDE and o,p -DDD, methoxychlor and its metabolites, chlordecone (Kepone ), dieldrin, Toxaphene, and endosulfan [126, 135, 136]. It is also known that many chemicals with very weak or no measurable estrogenic activity can be metabolized in organisms especially to hydroxylated compounds which may have much more estrogenic potency than the parent compound. Examples are methoxychlor and its mono- and di-demethylated derivatives [126,127] as well as the alkylphenol... 

The test system was considerably less sensitive to endosulfan when mouse ER, rather than human ER, was used to mediate (3-gal activity (Ramamoorthy et al. 1997). In similar assays, endosulfan at 10 jM had no effect on (3-gal activity in yeast Saccharomyces) transfected with either the human or rainbow trout ER (Andersen et al. 1999). In addition, no effect was observed on transcriptional activation of HeLa cells transfected with plasmids containing an estrogen receptor as a responsive element (Shelby et al. 1996). Endosulfan also did not induce transient reporter gene expression in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells at an incubation concentration of 2.5 pM (Andersen et al. 1999). Maximum endosulfan-induced ER-mediated luciferase reporter gene expression occurred in vitro in a T47D human breast adenocarcinoma cell line at approximately 10 pM, while 50% expression of luciferase occurred at about 5.9 pM the maximum expression was approximately 59% of the effect from exposure to 0.03 nM estradiol (0.00003 pM) (Legler et al. 1999). Luciferase expression from combined treatment with endosulfan and dieldrin was additive over concentrations ranging from 3 to 8 pM. 

Agarwal et al. 1978), the quantification of these specific enzymes may indicate that exposure to endosulfan has occurred. Blood tests, such as decay curves for aminopyrine in plasma, which are semiquantitative indices of liver enzyme induction, have been used successfully in the past to demonstrate enzyme induction in pesticide-exposed workers. Because numerous chemicals found at hazardous waste sites also induce these hepatic enzymes, these measurements are not specific for endosulfan exposure. However, measurements of enzyme activity, together with the detection of the parent compound or its metabolites in tissue or excreta, can be useful indicators of exposure. All of these potential biomarkers require further verification in epidemiological studies. Further studies with focus on the development of methods to separate and measure the estrogenicity of endosulfan in in vitro assays would be valuable since these assays are more sensitive and discriminative than other conventional biomarkers. Preliminary results have been presented by Sonnenschein et al. (1995). 

---