Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Enantiopure drugs

It was apparent that the FDA recognized the ability of the pharmaceutical industry to develop chiral assays. With the advent of chiral stationary phases (CSPs) in the early 1980s [8, 9], the tools required to resolve enantiomers were entrenched, thus enabling the researcher the ability to quantify, characterize, and identify stereoisomers. Given these tools, the researcher can assess the pharmacology or toxicology and pharmacokinetic properties of enantiopure drugs for potential interconversion, absorption, distribution, and excretion of the individual enantiomers. [Pg.252]

In November 1997, the Department of Health and Human Services along with the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) released a draft guidance for the selection of test procedures, which included chiral drugs. For the development of an enantiopure drug substance, acceptable criteria shall include, if possible, an enan-tioselective assay. This assay should be part of the specification for the identification of an enantiopure drug substance and related enantioenriched impurities [16]. [Pg.254]

These policy decisions by the FDA were the driving force for chiral switches and the commercial development of chromatographic processes such as simulated moving bed (SMB) technology. Due to technological advances such as SMB and the commercial availability of CSPs in bulk quantities for process-scale purification of enantiopure drugs, the production of many single enantiomers now exists on a commercial scale. [Pg.254]

Although in many cases an enantiopure drug can be safer than the racemate, the advantages are clear. The final formulation of the drug product could be reduced inhalf, potential side effects could be minimized, and the resulting pharmokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies could clearly determine the efficacy of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) [21]. [Pg.255]

Due to FDA policies, this was a pivotal point for the pharmaceutical industry and established the onslaught of mergers for the development of enantiopure drugs. [Pg.255]

Pharmaceutical manufacturers began to develop technologies either to resolve or selectively synthesize enantiopure drugs. The justification was that the active enantiopure drug would prove to be more efficacious, and this would allow drug companies to extend expiring originator patents. [Pg.255]

As markets for enantiopure drugs continue to develop, the pharmaceutical industry, fine chemical companies, and academic chemists are prospecting for new enan-tioselective technologies to produce them. [Pg.255]

In 1993, shortly after the FDA announced their first policy statement on enantiopure drugs, separations of pharmaceutical compounds were performed using SMB technology [25, 26]. Other applications now include fine chemistry, cosmetics, and perfume industry [27]. [Pg.256]

In order to illustrate an example of process design for the manufacture of enantiopure drug substances on an industrial SMB system, consider manufacturing 10 ton/ year of an enantiopure drug. The racemic drug by definition is a 50 50 mixture of each enantiomer (products A and B). The goal is to process enantiopure drug substances in order to obtain 99 % purity for both the extract and the raffinate. [Pg.267]

Due to the nature of the SMB process, in-process samples of the unwanted enantiomer and the enantiopure drug substance can be sampled at controlled times during the continuous process to assess the enantiomeric and chemical purity. One can monitor the process without system shutdown by diverting either the extract or the raffinate streams. Further monitoring of the receiving tanks can also be accomplished. [Pg.277]

Process validation should be extended to those steps determined to be critical to the quality and purity of the enantiopure drug. Establishing impurity profiles is an important aspect of process validation. One should consider chemical purity, enantiomeric excess by quantitative assays for impurity profiles, physical characteristics such as particle size, polymorphic forms, moisture and solvent content, and homogeneity. In principle, the SMB process validation should provide conclusive evidence that the levels of contaminants (chemical impurities, enantioenrichment of unwanted enantiomer) is reduced as processing proceeds during the purification process. [Pg.278]

SMB is now accepted as a real production tool. For instance, the Belgium pharmaceutical company U.C.B. Pharma announced recently the use of SMB for performing multi-ton scale purification of an enantiopure drug substance. The concept of large-scale purification of enantiomers using chromatographic techniques has moved from a dream to a reality within the last few years. [Pg.281]

The interests of SMB for performing large-scale separations of enantiopure drugs has been recognized (very short development time, extremely high probability of success, and attractive purification cost) [68]. Several pharmaceutical and fine chemical companies have already developed SMB processes. However, because of strong confidentiality constraints, public information is limited, and some of the major announcements are summarized below ... [Pg.281]

The evolution of FDA policies continues to be a significant driving force on the global pharmaceutical market. Several pharmaceutical firms have made new discoveries while evaluating enantiopure drugs originally discovered and marketed as race-mates by others. These pharmaceutical firms have merged, or other companies have appropriated portfolios of patents based on chiral switches. Thus, the FDA contin-... [Pg.281]

Preparative chromatography has been used for chiral separations for years, but examples of multi-kg separations (and hence larger ones) were rare until recently. The development of SMB techniques (both hardware and simulation software) has made major breakthroughs in this field. The ability of SMB as a development tool has allowed the pharmaceutical manufacturer to obtain kilo grams quantities of enantiopure drug substances as well benefit from the economics of large-scale production. [Pg.282]

From the position of the FDA, acceptance of SMB as a viable tool for cGMP manufacturing of enantiopure drug substances, there shall be no compromise, it must be properly engineered, and follow established guidelines. [Pg.282]


See other pages where Enantiopure drugs is mentioned: [Pg.252]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.342]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.314 ]




SEARCH



Enantiopurity

© 2024 chempedia.info