Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Enantiomers origin

Lammerhofer and Lindner [90] explained the chiral resolution of N-derivatized amino acids by CEC. The authors explained the formation of the transient diastereomeric ion-pairs between negatively charged analyte enantiomers and a positively charged chiral selector by multiple intermolecular interactions which might be differentially adsorbed to the ODS stationary phase. Furthermore, they claimed that the enantioseparation was achieved because of different observed mobilities of the analyte enantiomers originating from different ion-pair formation rates of the enantiomers and/or differential adsorption of the diastereoisomeric ion-pairs to the ODS stationary phase [90]. [Pg.371]

The resolving agent is tartaric acid 150 g are dissolved in water in a litre beaker. Then 240 ml of the mixture of isomers of 50 is added at 70 °C followed by 100 mis acetic acid at 90 °C and the solution cooled to 5 °C. The pure salt 51 separates out in 99% yield - that is 99% of all that enantiomer originally present - and with 99% ee. This is almost incredibly good. Though the free trans-diamine 50 can be isolated from this salt, it is air-sensitive and it is better to make the chiral catalyst 52 directly from the salt as shown. The yield is better than 95% and the catalyst 52 can be made in multi-kilogram quantities by this resolution.10... [Pg.444]

Besides the chiral resolution of pollutants, GC determination of enantiomeric ratios (ERs) can be used for the quantification of the enantiomers in complex matrices, with a known quantity of the pure enantiomer added as an internal standard. With a method of enantiomer labelling, a known quantity of an enantiopure standard is added to the mixture (or an aliquot of it) and the amount of the enantiomer originally present is calculated from the change in the ER after addition of the standard. This method provides precise knowledge of the ERs of the sample and the standards [87]. In addition, the absolute configurations of the pollutants may be determined directly, and free of chiroptical evidence, by GC via co-injection of reference pollutants with known stereochemistry [87]. [Pg.201]

Adopting the enantiomers of glyceraldehyde as stereo chemical reference com pounds originated with proposals made in 1906 by M A Rosanoff a chemist at New York University... [Pg.1028]

The original commercial source of E was extraction from bovine adrenal glands (5). This was replaced by a synthetic route for E and NE (Eig. 1) similar to the original pubHshed route of synthesis (6). Eriedel-Crafts acylation of catechol [120-80-9] with chloroacetyl chloride yields chloroacetocatechol [99-40-1]. Displacement of the chlorine by methylamine yields the methylamine derivative, adrenalone [99-45-6] which on catalytic reduction yields (+)-epinephrine [329-65-7]. Substitution of ammonia for methylamine in the sequence yields the amino derivative noradrenalone [499-61-6] which on reduction yields (+)-norepinephrine [138-65-8]. The racemic compounds were resolved with (+)-tartaric acid to give the physiologically active (—)-enantiomers. The commercial synthesis of E and related compounds has been reviewed (27). The synthetic route for L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine [59-92-7] (l-DOPA) has been described (28). [Pg.355]

The two protons at C-1 are topologically nonequivalent, since substitution of one produces a product tiiat is stereochemically distinct fiom that produced by substitution of the other. Ligands of this type are termed heterotopic, and, because the products of substitution are enantiomers, the more precise term enantiotopic also applies. If a chiral assembly is generated when a particular ligand is replaced by a new ligand, the original assembly is prochiral. Both C-1 and C-3 of 1,3-propanediol are prochiral centers. [Pg.105]

Walden inversion (Section 8.4) Originally, a reaction sequence developed by Paul Walden whereby a chiral starting material was transformed to its enantiomer by a series of stereospecihc reactions. Current usage is more general and refers to the inversion of conhguration that attends any bi-molecular nucleophilic substitution. [Pg.1296]

The origin of the remarkable stereoselectivities displayed by chiral homogeneous catalysts has occasioned much interest and speculation. It has been generally assumed, using a lock-and-key concept, that the major product enantiomer arose from a rigid preferred initial binding of the prochiral olefin with the chiral catalyst. Halpren 48) on the basis of considerable evidence, reached the opposite conclusion the predominant product enantiomer arises from the minor, less stable diastereomer of the olefin-catalyst adduct, which frequently does not accumulate in sufficient concentration to be detected. The predominant adduct is in essence a dead-end complex for it hydrogenates at a much slower rate than does the minor adduct. [Pg.48]

The area of racemic switches where a single enantiomer is developed subsequently to a corresponding racemate which is already on the market has attracted much interest [7, 8]. A description of the preclinical and clinical development of dexketoprofen provides a detailed example of one of these racemic switches [21]. The regulations in Europe and the US both allow for the development of a single enantiomer from a racemate by the use of bridging studies between the old and new applications. One problem to be considered is how a company which was not responsible for the original development can provide equivalent data. [Pg.339]

The original method had as a starting point the enantiomers of a standard compound, glyceraldehyde. [Pg.273]

In this case study, an enzymatic hydrolysis reaction, the racemic ibuprofen ester, i.e. (R)-and (S)-ibuprofen esters in equimolar mixture, undergoes a kinetic resolution in a biphasic enzymatic membrane reactor (EMR). In kinetic resolution, the two enantiomers react at different rates lipase originated from Candida rugosa shows a greater stereopreference towards the (S)-enantiomer. The membrane module consisted of multiple bundles of polymeric hydrophilic hollow fibre. The membrane separated the two immiscible phases, i.e. organic in the shell side and aqueous in the lumen. Racemic substrate in the organic phase reacted with immobilised enzyme on the membrane where the hydrolysis reaction took place, and the product (S)-ibuprofen acid was extracted into the aqueous phase. [Pg.130]

Biocatalytic access to both antipodal sulfoxides was exploited in total syntheses of bioactive compounds, which is outlined in some representative examples. Biooxidation of functionalized dialkyl sulfides was utilized in the direct synthesis of both enantiomers of sulforaphane and some analogs in low to good yields and stereoselectivities (Scheme 9.27) [206]. This natural product originates from broccoli and represents a potent inducer of detoxification enzymes in mammalian metabolism it might be related to anticarcinogenic properties of plants from the cruciform family. All four possible stereoisomers of methionine (R = Me) and ethionine sulfoxides... [Pg.254]

It is often possible to convert an achiral compound to a chiral compound by (1) addition of a chiral group (2) running an asymmetric synthesis, and (3) cleavage of the original chiral group. An example is conversion of the achiral 2-pentanone to the chiral 4-methyl-3-heptanone (50). In this case, >99% of the product was the (5) enantiomer. Compound 49 is called a chiral auxiliary because it is used to induce asymmetry and then is removed. [Pg.149]

There is one fail-safe way to tell if a compound is a meso compound simply draw what you think should be the enantiomer and see if you can rotate the new drawing in any way to superimpose on the original drawing. If you can, then the compound will be meso. If not, then your second drawing is the enantiomer of the original compound. [Pg.157]

In 1996, Fu et al. reported the S3mthesis of the planar chiral heterocycles 64, formally DMAP fused with a ferrocene core [82]. While the original synthesis provided racemic 64a in only 2% overall yield requiring a subsequent resolution by preparative HPLC on a chiral stationary phase, a recently improved synthesis furnished the racemic complexes 64 in 32-40% yield over seven steps. A subsequent resolution with di-p-toluoyltartaric or dibenzoyltartaric acid gave access to the enantiomers with >99% ee (28 14% yield for each isomer in this step) [83]. [Pg.163]


See other pages where Enantiomers origin is mentioned: [Pg.187]    [Pg.654]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.654]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.254]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.600]    [Pg.696]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.781]    [Pg.855]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.40]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.211 , Pg.212 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.205 , Pg.206 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info