Emulsion polymerization initiation rates

Since the same propagation rate constant applies to both bulk and emulsion polymerization, comparable rates of polymerization R must obtain when the number of emulsion particles is twice the number of radicals at the steady state in the bulk polymerization. An increase in the bulk rate at the given temperature can only be realized by an increase in the rate of initiation and, thus, an increase in the... 

From a fundamental point of view it is interesting to speculate on tbe differences that could exist between the kinetics of emulsion polymerization initiated by y radiation and those of a conventional chemical initiator with, for example, potassium persulfate. At dose rates jiving a free radical flux comparable to those achieved with chemical initiation any differences... 

In emulsion polymerization, the rate of generation of free radicals is about lO Vm-s while the number of monomer-polymer particles for typical recipes, N, is in the range 10 to 10 particles/ml of the aqueous phase. Consequently, if all the initiator radicals are captured by the monomer-qxilymer particles, each particle will acquire, at the most, a radical every 1 to 100 s. It can be shown that if a particle contains two radicals, mutual annihilation of radical activity will occur within a time span of the order... 

For emulsion polymerization, the rate of generation of radicals from the initiator is of the order of 10 radicals/cm /s the number of polymer particles is about 10 particles/cm and the average diameter of polymer particles is 1000 A. The rate of diffusion of radicals to the polymer surface is... 

Monomer conversion can be adjusted by manipulating the feed rate of initiator or catalyst. If on-line M WD is available, initiator flow rate or reactor temperature can be used to adjust MW [38]. In emulsion polymerization, initiator feed rate can be used to control monomer conversion, while bypassing part of the water and monomer around the first reactor in a train can be used to control PSD [39,40]. Direct control of surfactant feed rate, based on surface tension measurements also can be used. Polymer quality and end-use property control are hampered, as in batch polymerization, by infrequent, off-line measurements. In addition, on-line measurements may be severely delayed due to the constraints of the process flowsheet. For example, even if on-line viscometry (via melt index) is available every 1 to 5 minutes, the viscometer may be situated at the outlet of an extruder downstream of the polymerization reactor. The transportation delay between the reactor where the MW develops, and the viscometer where the MW is measured (or inferred) may be several hours. Thus, even with frequent sampling, the data is old. There are two approaches possible in this case. One is to do open-loop, steady-state control. In this approach, the measurement is compared to the desired output when the system is believed to be at steady state. A manual correction to the process is then made, based on the error. The corrected inputs are maintained until the process reaches a new steady state, at which time the process is repeated. This approach is especially valid if the dominant dynamics of the process are substantially faster than the sampling interval. Another approach is to connect the output to the appropriate process input(s) in a closed-loop scheme. In this case, the loop must be substantially detuned to compensate for the large measurement delay. The addition of a dead time compensator can... 

The initiator was also found to make an unusual contribution to the polymerization reaction rate. In dispersion (emulsion) polymerization, initiator concenfra-tion is controlled to control the molecular weight of the polymer. Sometimes the reaction is conducted at a lower... 

Redox initiator systems are normally used in the emulsion polymerization of VDC to develop high rates at low temperatures. Reactions must be carried out below - 80° C to prevent degradation of the polymer. Poly(vinyHdene chloride) in emulsion is also attacked by aqueous base. Therefore, reactions should be carried out at low pH. 

Buffers are frequently added to emulsion recipes and serve two main purposes. The rate of hydrolysis of vinyl acetate and some comonomers is pH-sensitive. Hydrolysis of monomer produces acetic acid, which can affect the initiator, and acetaldehyde which as a chain-transfer agent may lower the molecular weight of the polymer undesirably. The rates of decomposition of some initiators are affected by pH and the buffer is added to stabilize those rates, since decomposition of the initiator frequently changes the pH in an unbuffered system. Vinyl acetate emulsion polymerization recipes are usually buffered to pH 4—5, eg, with phosphate or acetate, but buffering at neutral pH with bicarbonate also gives excellent results. The pH of most commercially available emulsions is 4—6. 

Propagation. The rate of emulsion polymerization has been found to depend on initiator, monomer, and emulsifier concentrations. In a system of vinyl acetate, sodium lauryl sulfate, and potassium persulfate, the following relationship for the rate of polymerization has been suggested (85) ... 

Emulsion Polymerization. Emulsion polymerization takes place in a soap micelle where a small amount of monomer dissolves in the micelle. The initiator is water-soluble. Polymerization takes place when the radical enters the monomer-swollen micelle (91,92). Additional monomer is supphed by diffusion through the water phase. Termination takes place in the growing micelle by the usual radical-radical interactions. A theory for tme emulsion polymerization postulates that the rate is proportional to the number of particles [N. N depends on the 0.6 power of the soap concentration [S] and the 0.4 power of initiator concentration [i] the average number of radicals per particle is 0.5 (93). 

The kinetic mechanism of emulsion polymerization was developed by Smith and Ewart [10]. The quantitative treatment of this mechanism was made by using Har-kin s Micellar Theory [18,19]. By means of quantitative treatment, the researchers obtained an expression in which the particle number was expressed as a function of emulsifier concentration, initiation, and polymerization rates. This expression was derived for the systems including the monomers with low water solubility and partly solubilized within the micelles formed by emulsifiers having low critical micelle concentration (CMC) values [10]. 

The rate of an ideal emulsion polymerization is given by Eqn (4). In this expression [/] is the initiator concentration, [ ] is the emulsifier concentration, and [M] is the concentration of monomer within the forming latex particles. This value is constant for a long reaction period until all the monomer droplets disappear within the water phase. 

Flgure 4 The effect of initiator concentration on the variation of monomer conversion by the polymerization time in the emulsion polymerization of styrene. Styrene-water = 1/3 SDS = 15.4 mM reaction volume = 300 ml stirring rate = 250 rpm temperature = 70°C. 

Based on the Smith-Ewart theory, the number of latex particles formed and the rate of polymerization in Interval II is proportional with the 0,6 power of the emulsifier concentration. This relation was also observed experimentally for the emulsion polymerization of styrene by Bartholomeet al. [51], Dunn and Al-Shahib [52] demonstrated that when the concentrations of the different emulsifiers were selected so that the micellar concentrations were equal, the same number of particles having the same size could be obtained by the same polymerization rates in Interval II in the existence of different emulsifiers [52], The number of micelles formed initially in the polymerization medium increases with the increasing emulsifier concentration. This leads to an increase in the total amount of monomer solubilized by micelles. However, the number of emulsifier molecules in one micelle is constant for a certain type of emulsifier and does not change with the emulsifier concentration. The monomer is distributed into more micelles and thus, the... 

---