Employers’ Liability Act

Meanwhile, in 1880 the British Parliament passed the Employers Liability Act which, among other things, restricted the use of the fellow servant defense. (Germany, the leader among industrial countries in this... 

Early legislation tried to increase employer responsibility by removing some of the common law defenses assumption of risk and the fellow servant rule. Some liability laws also changed contributory negligence to comparative negligence and allowed juries to determine whether the employer or employee was more negligent. Under Employer Liability Acts, the injured worker had to take his claim to court. The worker had to find fellow workers who would risk... 

Prior to 1970 most governmental actions were supportive of informational or liability responses to market failure. The Carmack Amendment of 1906 made railroad strictly liable for loss and damage to freight. The Federal Employers Liability Act of 1908 established liability for occupational injuries. The Accident Reports Act of 1910 required railroads to provide information on accidents. The same act allowed the ICC to investigate railroad accidents. These powers were transferred to the NTSB in 1974. Signal failures have had to be reported to the government since the Signal Inspection Act of 1920. 

Supportive of other policy responses Carmack Amendment Federal Employers Liability Act Accident reporting (49 CFR 225) Signal failure reporting (49 CFR 233) NTSB investigations (49 CFR 840)... 

General Accounting Office. (1996). Federal Employers Liability Act Issues Associated with Changing How Railroad Work-Related Injuries are Compensated. Report GAO/RCED-96-199. Washington D.C. U.S. Government Printing Office. 

Transportation Research Board. (1994). Compensating Injured Railroad Workers Under the Federal Employers Liability Act. Special Report 241. Washington DC National Academy Press. 

Act of May 16, 1910, Public Law No. 61-179, 3 Stat. 369 (1910) (mine safety statute) Federal Employers Liability Act of 1908, chapter 149, 35 Stat. 65 (1908) Daniel J. Curran, Dead Laws for Dead Men 66-67 (D93)i William Graebner, Coal-Mining Safety in the Progressive Period 23, 33 (1976) McEvoy, Triangle Shirtwaist, 646. 

Employers Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969. A short guide (superseded by HSE 36 1998)... 

Recommendation The Army shonld work with state regnlators to tailor RAP mechanisms to the magnitnde of the NSCWM recovery and treatment operations. Eor facilities, initial operations should be conducted under expedited RAP mechanisms (e.g., a Research, Development, and Demonstration permit) traditional Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) permits, if necessary, should be employed after operations become routine. When mobile treatment systems or technologies are employed, and par-ticnlarly for small or even moderate qnantities of newly discovered NSCWM, expedited (non-RCRA permit) regulatory approval mechanisms nnder RCRA or the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) shonld be nsed, as appropriate (Recommendation 4-1). 

After 1885 the principle of employers liability in respect to employment injury began to appear in the legislation of the different states. New Yoik passed factory inspection legislation. Massachusetts was the first state to pass an act requiring that accidents be reported on June 1,1886. 

Under the Act on the Contractor s Obligations and Liability when Work is Contracted Out (Finlex 2006b), a contractor has the duty to check that their contracting partner has discharged their statutory obligations. The purpose of the act is to promote fair competition between companies and compliance with terms of employment. This act is followed in the case company, whose role is comparable with a nuiin contractor s role. 

Following the decision in Young v. Bristol Aeroplane Company Limited [1944] 2 All ER 293 it became established that a workman was precluded from pursuing a claim at common law even where he did not know of his right to elect if he had in fact accepted weekly payments under the Workmen s Compensation scheme. The Workmen s Compensation insurance policies issued at that time indemnified the insured against his liability to pay compensation under the Workmen s Compensation Act, the Employer s Liability Act 1880 and the Factories Act 1846 or at common law in the event of personal injury to any employee arising out of and in the course of his employment. 

The employer can be held liable either directly for breach of his own duties or vicariously. Vicarious liability arises where an employee or an agent of the employer has acted negligently and caused injury to another employee. The employer is legally liable for the wrongful act or omission where it has been performed in his interests. However, he is not liable if the employee acts negligently on a frolic of his own independently of his employment. Smith v. Crossley Bros. Ltd illustrates this, where, as a joke, two apprentices injected compressed air into the body of a third and the employers were held not liable. 

Employers are responsible for the health and safety of employees while they are at work. Employees may be injured at work, or they or former employees may become III as a result of their work while employed. They may try to claim compensation from the employer if they believe them to be responsible. The Employers Liability Compulsory Insurance Act 1969 ensures that an employer has at least a minimum level of insurance cover against any such claims. 

An employer needs employers liability insurance unless they are exempt from the Employers Liability Compulsory Insurance Act. The following employers are exempt ... 

Employer s Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969 161,169,170 Employment Act 1989 88 Employment Act 2002 86, 94, 96,104 Employment (Age) Discrimination Regulations 2006 101 Employment Equality (Sex Discrimination) Regulations 2005 96 Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978 94 Employment Relations Act 1999 94,106 Emplo)unent Rights Act 1996 86, 95 Employment Rights Dispute Resolution Act 1998 103 Emplo5unent Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2001 96... 

---