Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Emission flyash

Environmental considerations also were reflected in coal production and consumption statistics, including regional production patterns and economic sector utilization characteristics. Average coal sulfur content, as produced, declined from 2.3% in 1973 to 1.6% in 1980 and 1.3% in 1990. Coal ash content declined similarly, from 13.1% in 1973 to 11.1% in 1980 and 9.9% in 1990. These numbers clearly reflect a trend toward utilization of coal that produces less SO2 and less flyash to capture. Emissions from coal in the 1990s were 14 x 10 t /yr of SO2 and 450 x 10 t /yr of particulates generated by coal combustion at electric utiUties. The total coal combustion emissions from all sources were only slightly higher than the emissions from electric utiUty coal utilization (6). [Pg.4]

Formation of Airborne Emissions. Airborne emissions are formed from combustion of waste fuels as a function of certain physical and chemical reactions and mechanisms. In grate-fired systems, particulate emissions result from particles being swept through the furnace and boiler in the gaseous combustion products, and from incomplete oxidation of the soHd particles, with consequent char carryover. If pile burning is used, eg, the mass bum units employed for unprocessed MSW, typically only 20—25% of the unbumed soHds and inerts exit the combustion system as flyash. If spreader-stoker technologies are employed, between 75 and 90% of the unbumed soHds and inerts may exit the combustion system in the form of flyash. [Pg.58]

Formation of emissions from fluidised-bed combustion is considerably different from that associated with grate-fired systems. Flyash generation is a design parameter, and typically >90% of all soHds are removed from the system as flyash. SO2 and HCl are controlled by reactions with calcium in the bed, where the lime-stone fed to the bed first calcines to CaO and CO2, and then the lime reacts with sulfur dioxide and oxygen, or with hydrogen chloride, to form calcium sulfate and calcium chloride, respectively. SO2 and HCl capture rates of 70—90% are readily achieved with fluidi2ed beds. The limestone in the bed plus the very low combustion temperatures inhibit conversion of fuel N to NO. ... [Pg.58]

Results For the St. Louis data, the target transformation analysis results for the fine fraction without July Uth and 5th are given in table 6. The presence of a motor vehicle source, a sulfur source, a soil or flyash source, a titanium source, and a zinc source are indicated. The sulfur, titanium and zinc factors were determined from the simple initial test vectors for those elements. The concentration of sulfur was not related to any other elements and represents a secondary sulfate aerosol resulting from the conversion of primary sulfur oxide emissions. Titanium was found to be associated with sulfur, calcium, iron, and barium. Rheingrover ( jt) identified the source of titanium as a paint-pigment factory located to the south of station 112. The zinc factor, associated with the elements chlorine, potassium, iron and lead, is attributed to refuse incinerator emissions. This factor could also represent particles from zinc and/or lead smelters, though a high chlorine concentration is usually associated with particles from refuse incinerators ( ). The sulfur concentration in the refined sulfate factor is consistent with that of ammonium sulfate. The calculated lead concentration in the motor vehicle factor of ten percent and a lead to bromine ratio of about 0.28 are typical of values reported in the literature (25). The concentration of lead in... [Pg.37]

The Clean Air Act of 1990 has made trace metal content in fuels and wastes the final ash-related compositional characteristic of significance. Considerable attention is paid (ca 1993) to emissions of such metals as arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, silver, and zinc. The concentration of these metals in both grate ash and flyash is of significance as a result of federal and state requirements of particular importance is the mobility of metals. This mobility, and the consequent toxicity of the ash product, is determined by the Toxic Characteristic Leaching Procedure (tclp) test. Tables 8—10 present trace metal contents for wood wastes and agricultural wastes, municipal waste, and refuse-derived fuel, respectively. In Table 8, the specific concentration of various components in the RDF governs the expected average concentration of trace metals. [Pg.55]

Using flyash offers several advantages. Flyash ordinarily is dumped in landfills. Replacing cement with flyash can reduce CO2 emissions and prevent... [Pg.80]

The environmental benefits associated with biomass cofiring at the Albright Gen ting Station have been substantial. Firing 10 percent sawdust—OT 5.4 tonne/hr (6 ton/hr)—results in a reduction of SO2, NO, and mercury simultaneously. At the same time it does not result in an increase in opacity, particulate emissions, or CO emissions. Further the reduction in NOx does not come with an increase in unbumed carbon in the flyash [48]. [Pg.163]

The results of the demonstration were as favorable as those obtained during the parametric tests, Capacity was not reduced as a function of cofiring. Efficiency reductions were modest. C ioationally there were no problems with opacity, unbumed carbon or LOI in the flyash, or CO emissions. The Seward Station demonstration also demonstrated an operational benefit—the ability of cofiring to help... [Pg.167]

Carbon dioxide emissions have also become an important issue, especially since the process of calcination liberates 500 kgcoj/tonne of clinker. The fuel combustion-related emissions add between 150 and 400 kg/tonne depending on kiln efficiency and fuel used. Total per unit CO2 emissions will be reduced gradually over the next 20 years through plant efficiency improvements, the use of waste fuels otherwise landfilled, landfill gas as a secondary fuel, and the use of flyash in blended cements to reduce the need for clinker. [Pg.160]


See other pages where Emission flyash is mentioned: [Pg.52]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.882]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.163]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.40 ]




SEARCH



Flyash

© 2024 chempedia.info