Electron transfer classical theory

We now turn to the hierarchy of electron-transfer rate theories that have developed since the 1950s, starting with classical Marcus theory of homogeneous reactions and the development of eq. 4.4. In later sections we shall consider theories of nonadiabatic ET, which allow the identification and evaluation of the prefactor A in eq. 4.4, and also electrochemical ET, which differs from homogeneous reactions in that an electronic conductor is one of the reactants . 

Figure 2.1 (Plate 2.1) shows a classification of the processes that we consider they aU involve interaction of the reactants both with the solvent and with the metal electrode. In simple outer sphere electron transfer, the reactant is separated from the electrode by at least one layer of solvent hence, the interaction with the metal is comparatively weak. This is the realm of the classical theories of Marcus [1956], Hush [1958], Levich [1970], and German and Dogonadze [1974]. Outer sphere transfer can also involve the breaking of a bond (Fig. 2. lb), although the reactant is not in direct contact with the metal. In inner sphere processes (Fig. 2. Ic, d) the reactant is in contact with the electrode depending on the electronic structure of the system, the electronic interaction can be weak or strong. Naturally, catalysis involves a strong...

The interpretation of phenomenological electron-transfer kinetics in terms of fundamental models based on transition state theory [1,3-6,10] has been hindered by our primitive understanding of the interfacial structure and potential distribution across ITIES. The structure of ITIES was initially studied by electrochemical and thermodynamic analyses, and more recently by computer simulations and interfacial spectroscopy. Classical electrochemical analysis based on differential capacitance and surface tension measurements has been extensively discussed in the literature [11-18]. The picture that emerged from... 

Instead of the quantity given by Eq. (15), the quantity given by Eq. (10) was treated as the activation energy of the process in the earlier papers on the quantum mechanical theory of electron transfer reactions. This difference between the results of the quantum mechanical theory of radiationless transitions and those obtained by the methods of nonequilibrium thermodynamics has also been noted in Ref. 9. The results of the quantum mechanical theory were obtained in the harmonic oscillator model, and Eqs. (9) and (10) are valid only if the vibrations of the oscillators are classical and their frequencies are unchanged in the course of the electron transition (i.e., (o k = w[). It might seem that, in this case, the energy of the transition and the free energy of the transition are equal to each other. However, we have to remember that for the solvent, the oscillators are the effective ones and the parameters of the system Hamiltonian related to the dielectric properties of the medium depend on the temperature. Therefore, the problem of the relationship between the results obtained by the two methods mentioned above deserves to be discussed. 

A semi-classical treatment171-175 of the model depicted in Fig. 15, based on the Morse curve theory of thermal dissociative electron transfer described earlier, allows the prediction of the quantum yield as a function of the electronic matrix coupling element, H.54 The various states to be considered in the region where the zero-order potential energy curves cross each other are shown in the insert of Fig. 15. The treatment of the whole kinetics leads to the expression of the complete quenching fragmentation quantum yield, oc, given in equation (61)... 

The theory of electron-transfer reactions presented in Chapter 6 was mainly based on classical statistical mechanics. While this treatment is reasonable for the reorganization of the outer sphere, the inner-sphere modes must strictly be treated by quantum mechanics. It is well known from infrared spectroscopy that molecular vibrational modes possess a discrete energy spectrum, and that at room temperature the spacing of these levels is usually larger than the thermal energy kT. Therefore we will reconsider electron-transfer reactions from a quantum-mechanical viewpoint that was first advanced by Levich and Dogonadze [1]. In this course we will rederive several of, the results of Chapter 6, show under which conditions they are valid, and obtain generalizations that account for the quantum nature of the inner-sphere modes. By necessity this chapter contains more mathematics than the others, but the calculations axe not particularly difficult. Readers who are not interested in the mathematical details can turn to the summary presented in Section 6. 

Let us summarize the results obtained. The theory is restricted to nonadiabatic electron-transfer reactions. If only classical modes are reorganized during the transition, the rate constant for the oxidation is ... 

A well defined theory of chemical reactions is required before analyzing solvent effects on this special type of solute. The transition state theory has had an enormous influence in the development of modern chemistry [32-37]. Quantum mechanical theories that go beyond the classical statistical mechanics theory of absolute rate have been developed by several authors [36,38,39], However, there are still compelling motivations to formulate an alternate approach to the quantum theory that goes beyond a theory of reaction rates. In this paper, a particular theory of chemical reactions is elaborated. In this theoretical scheme, solvent effects at the thermodynamic and quantum mechanical level can be treated with a fair degree of generality. The theory can be related to modern versions of the Marcus theory of electron transfer [19,40,41] but there is no... 

In classical kinetic theory the activity of a catalyst is explained by the reduction in the energy barrier of the intermediate, formed on the surface of the catalyst. The rate constant of the formation of that complex is written as k = k0 cxp(-AG/RT). Photocatalysts can also be used in order to selectively promote one of many possible parallel reactions. One example of photocatalysis is the photochemical synthesis in which a semiconductor surface mediates the photoinduced electron transfer. The surface of the semiconductor is restored to the initial state, provided it resists decomposition. Nanoparticles have been successfully used as photocatalysts, and the selectivity of these reactions can be further influenced by the applied electrical potential. Absorption chemistry and the current flow play an important role as well. The kinetics of photocatalysis are dominated by the Langmuir-Hinshelwood adsorption curve [4], where the surface coverage PHY = KC/( 1 + PC) (K is the adsorption coefficient and C the initial reactant concentration). Diffusion and mass transfer to and from the photocatalyst are important and are influenced by the substrate surface preparation. 

So far, only the nuclear reorganization energy attending electron transfer has been discussed, yielding the expressions above of the free energy of activation in the framework of classical transition state theory. A second series of important factors are those that govern the preexponential factor, k, raising in particular the question of the adiabaticity or nonadiabaticity of electron transfer between a molecule and the electronic states in the electrode. 

Comparison with the case of a purely repulsive product profile [equation (3.17)] vs. equations (3.3) and (3.4) reveals that the effect of an attractive interaction between the fragments in the product cluster is not merely described by the introduction of a work term in the classical theory of dissociative electron transfer. Such a work term appears under the form of —AG p, but there is also a modification of the intrinsic barrier. With the same Ap, the change in the intrinsic barrier would simply be obtained by replacement of Dr by /Dr — /D )2. It is noteworthy that small values of DP produce rather strong effects of the intrinsic barrier. For example, if DP is 4% of Dr, a decrease of 20% of the intrinsic barrier follows. The fact that a relatively small interaction leads to a substantial decrease of the activation barrier is depicted in Figure 3.4. 

We next consider the expression for k in the classical formalism. According to the Franck-Condon principle, internuclear distances and nuclear velocities do not change during the actual electron transfer. This requirement is incorporated into the classical electron-transfer theories by postulating that the electron transfer occurs at the intersection of two potential energy surfaces, one for the reactants... 

The Golden Rule approach has been used for many years by Levich, Dogonadze, and co-workers (39, 40), who have stressed the difference between the roles of "quantum" (high-frequency) and "classical" coupling modes in discussing the theory of electron transfer, and by a number of subsequent workers (16, 41). 

Some authors have described the time evolution of the system by more general methods than time-dependent perturbation theory. For example, War-shel and co-workers have attempted to calculate the evolution of the function /(r, Q, t) defined by Eq. (3) by a semi-classical method [44, 96] the probability for the system to occupy state v]/, is obtained by considering the fluctuations of the energy gap between and 11, which are induced by the trajectories of all the atoms of the system. These trajectories are generated through molecular dynamics models based on classical equations of motion. This method was in particular applied to simulate the kinetics of the primary electron transfer process in the bacterial reaction center [97]. Mikkelsen and Ratner have recently proposed a very different approach to the electron transfer problem, in which the time evolution of the system is described by a time-dependent statistical density operator [98, 99]. 

We start from classical transition state theory which provides the basic factorization of the electron transfer rate constant ... 

Figure 11. The solid line depicts the quantum adiabatic free energy curve for the Fe /Fe electron transfer at the water/Pt(lll) interface (obtained by using the Anderson-Newns model, path integral quantum transition state theory, and the umbrella sampling of molecular dynamics. The dashed line shows the curve from the classical calculation as given in Fig. 5. (Reprinted from Ref 14.)...

A topological study ofthe electron transfer in Li + CI2 system and of the three-electron hond created throngh this transfer has been achieved, based on the topological concepts of Bonding Evolntion Theory. Our results suggest that the dual cusp catastrophe characterizes the diahatic surface crossings which are subjacent in the classical adiabatic analysis ofthe overall reaction path. 

---