Efficiency supply chain process

Improved process efficiency Automation of order management More efficient supply chain management Better market transparency and improved process ciency Automation of order management Superior product selection tools Segment specific market information Customized value-added services ... 

Clearly, arrangements must be made early in the trial to ensure that an efficient supply chain is set up and the associated costs (which can be significant) taken into account. In recent years, sponsors have utilized methods such as minimization techniques (within the randomization process for controlled randomized trials) to help reduce waste of clinical trial medication and hence reduce the overall cost. 

During the sustainment phase, the individual agencies want to operate efficiently but may still require assistance such as security info, weather information, sharing of resources, help with breaking up cartels, assistance with persistent problems involving interpretation of laws, and coordination with military. Since many parallel efforts may be in operation, with each agency having its own supply chain processes, it may be appropriate to coordinate by consensus. 

While companies attempted to implement best practices over the last 30 years, they are now grappling with the fact that many Y2K projects built an efficient supply chain without resiliency. These investments made the supply chain strong, but not agile. Today, most companies have processes that can respond, but cannot adapt. They are too rigid. They cannot sense and adapt to market shifts. This is the basis of the drive to create market-driven value networks. 

First Shift in the Supply Chain Process The Efficient Supply Chain... 

In the beginning, supply chain excellence was defined as the lowest manufactured cost. The belief was that supply chain excellence could be achieved by sweating the assets. This set of beliefs formed the foundation for the efficient supply chain. Through the evolution of supply chain processes, costs were reduced, inventory levels lowered, and waste eliminated however, each company reached a point where they could no longer just cut costs without trading off service to customers. They had reached their effective frontier. 

With product personalization, volume decreases and the predictability of supply declines. As a result, many companies are facing a new world of defining and managing supply processes for long tail supply chains. By definition, the further out the product portfolio is in the tail, the less efficient the supply chain process, ft is also less suitable for traditional linear optimization technlqnes found in the first generation of snpply chain planning technologies. 

Supply chain excellence has evolved. The definition has morphed from the efficient supply chain to a market-driven value network. Today, the concept of a market-driven value network is largely aspirational. It is a new goal. As supply risks and costs have grown, companies realize that a demand-driven approach is not sufficient. The focus needs to be about more than the channel, instead, the supply chain needs to be driven through strong horizontal processes bidirectionally from market to market. Accomplishing the goal requires a redefinition of both buy-side and sell-side processes, and the use of new forms of analytics to sense, shape, and orchestrate bidirectionally market to market. 

Logistics is that part of the supply chain process that plans, implements, and controls the efficient, effective flow and storage of goods, services, and related information from the point of origin to the point of consumption in order to meet customers requirements. ... 

A related phenomenon in the area of procurement and supplier relationships has been industry wide consortia where multiple buyers and suppliers within an industry join and conduct business. Better transactional efficiency has been highlighted as the key benefit of these consortia such as Covisint (automotive) and Converge (hi-tech). The dynamics of these entities are not very well understood and pose several important questions. For example, one could expect that having multiple suppliers on the same platform is likely to reduce prices for the buyer, but it is likely to benefit other buyers in the consortium as well. Thus, it is not clear if one should join the consortium in the first place. In fact, one of the reasons for Dell deciding not to join either of the high tech consortia, Converge or e2open, could be that they do not want to open up their supply chain processes to competitors. 

Reiner, G. Hoffman, P. (2006). Efficiency analysis of supply chain processes. International Journal of Production Research, vol. 44, pp. 5065-5087. 

Regardless of how proficiency criteria are determined, all the above models present the road to excellence understood as the fulfilment of supply chain management principles. The levels of excellence most frequently pertain to selected supply chain processes or resources. Less often, they relate to conditions that should come with improvements. Issues related to the circumstances (background) of process and resources excellence are very important, as the low effectiveness and unsatisfactory efficiency of measures imdertaken in this area is often caused by ignorance on the part of the entities initiating and implementing SCM principles. 

The customer advisory board creates a link between the company and the customer. Customers should be integrated into the development and optimization of supply chain processes in companies. The customer advisory board should have bi-annual meetings in order to talk about the performance of the company. The inviting company obtains insight into the most important interests and requirements of the downstream supply chain companies. Personal or behavioral aspects can make processes more efficient. 

In order to assess the AS-IS configuration of the supply chain holistically, aspects of customer and supplier segmentation, supply chain strategy, manufacturing-related aspects, supply chain processes, supply chain governance, and the efficiency of supply chain management integration are covered. The contents of these topics are briefly summarized below in Fig. 9.2. 

Accordingly, the software environment must be geared towards the efficient control and constant improvement of supply chain processes and sequences. 

A complex approach to the supply chains management, with particular emphasis on depend-abiUty of logistic systems and the continuity of the processes realised by them is, according to the authors, the key to the success of the actions mentioned above. The aim of this paper is to present a proposition of a unified model encompassing both of these aspects (systems dependability and process continuity) in a constituent and non-contradictory way, as bases for an effective and efficient supply chains management. 

---