Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Effect of surface deposits

Note that even though the length L does not enter into this problem, we can use it merely to obtain the same dimensionless variables as in the previous problem.) c. We want to compare the two solutions numerically for parameters of interest in air pollution to explore (1) the effect of diffusion in the X direction and (2) the effect of surface deposition. Thus evaluate the two solutions for the following parameter values ... [Pg.915]

What considerations have been given to the potential effects of surface deposits on (a) friction, (b) reactivity, and... [Pg.106]

One of the major effects of acidic deposition is felt by aquatic ecosystems in mountainous terrain, where considerable precipitation occurs due to orographic lifting. The maximum effect is felt where there is little buffering of the acid by soil or rock structures and where steep lakeshore slopes allow little time for precipitation to remain on the ground surface before entering the lake. Maximum fish kills occur in the early spring due to the "acid shock" of the first meltwater, which releases the pollution accumulated in the winter snowpack. This first melt may be 5-10 times more acidic than rainfall. [Pg.152]

PLUVUE is a model tliat predicts tlie transport, atmospheric difinsion, chemical conversion, optical effects and surface deposition of point-source emissions. [Pg.386]

The (photo)electrochemical behavior of p-InSe single-crystal vdW surface was studied in 0.5 M H2SO4 and 1.0 M NaOH solutions, in relation to the effect of surface steps on the crystal [183]. The pH-potential diagram was constructed, in order to examine the thermodynamic stability of the InSe crystals (Fig. 5.12). The mechanism of photoelectrochemical hydrogen evolution in 0.5 M H2SO4 and the effect of Pt modification were discussed. A several hundred mV anodic shift of the photocurrent onset potential was observed by depositing Pt on the semiconductor electrode. [Pg.257]

Figure 3a is an illustration of the effect of surface overpotential on the limiting-current plateau, in the case of copper deposition from an acidified solution at a rotating-disk electrode. The solid curves are calculated limiting currents for various values of the exchange current density, expressed as ratios to the limiting-current density. Here the surface overpotential is related to the current density by the Erdey Gruz-Volmer-Butler equation (V4) ... [Pg.225]

Effect of Underpotentially Deposited Lead on the Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering of Interfacial Water at Silver Electrode Surfaces... [Pg.398]

Under FCCU operating conditions, almost 100% of the metal contaminants in the feed (such as nickel, vanadium, iron and copper porphyrins) are decomposed and deposited on the catalyst (2). The most harmful of these contaminants are vanadium and nickel. The deleterious effect of the deposited vanadium on catalyst performance and the manner in which vanadium is deposited on the cracking catalyst differ from those of nickel. The effect of vanadium on the catalyst performance is primarily a decrease in catalyst activity while the major effect of nickel is a selectivity change reflected in increased coke and gas yields (3). Recent laboratory studies (3-6) show that nickel distributes homogeneously over the catalyst surface while vanadium preferentially deposits on and reacts destructively with the zeolite. A mechanism for vanadium poisoning involving volatile vanadic acid as the... [Pg.229]

Puurunen et al. have investigated the effect of surface nitridation of y-AI2O3 supports by the atomic layer deposition process on the activity of chromium catalysts for isobutane dehydrogenation. Nitridation was observed to suppress activity and it was argued that oxide ions were more active for the dissociation of isobutane. [Pg.111]

Once particles have been formed, they grow by the combined effect of vapor deposition and continued coagulation. The transport of vapor species to the surfaces of the aerosol particles depends on the size of the aerosol particle relative to the mean free path of the gas molecules. A. that is, it depends on the Knudsen number characteristic of vapor diffusion to the particle, Kn ... [Pg.736]

Estimation of the effects of N deposition on aquatic systems is made difficult by the large variety of forms of N found in air, deposition, watersheds, and surface waters, as well as by the myriad pathways through which N can be cycled in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. These complexities separate N deposition from its effects and reduce our ability to attribute known aquatic effects to known rates of N deposition. The organization of this chapter reflects this complexity. Because an understanding of the ways that N is cycled through watersheds is critical to our understanding of N effects, I begin with a brief description of the N cycle and of the transformations of N that may occur in watersheds. I then discuss the two most likely effects of N deposition (acidification and eutrophication). [Pg.225]

Acid rain primarily affects sensitive bodies of water, that is, those that rest atop soil with a limited ability to neutralize acidic compounds (called buffering capacity ). Many lakes and streams examined in a National Surface Water Survey (NSWS) suffer from chronic acidity, a condition m which water lias a constant low (acidic) pH level. The survey investigated tlie effects of acidic deposition in over 1,000 lakes larger than 10 acres and in thousands of miles of streams believed to be sensitive to acidification. Of the lakes and streams surveyed in the NSWS, arid rain has been determined to cause acidity in 75 percent of the acidic lakes and about 50 percent of tlie acidic streams. Several regions in the U.S. were identified as containing many of the surface waters sensitive to acidification. They include, but are not limited to, the Adirondacks. the mid-Appalachian highlands, the upper Midwest, and the high elevation West. [Pg.9]

The most likely effect of PdAu deposited on the PdAu/SnOx sensor surface is the promotion of the dissociative adsorption of C2H 0H (Step 2) due to the strong catalytic strength of Pd on hydrocarbon adsorbates. Hence, more active hydrogen species (H ) are created by Pd, and more localized electrons [0-2 (ads)] are released and injected back to the SnOx conduction band (12,13). [Pg.67]

However, when the adsorption process is reversible, one cannot use the traditional approach to measuring the effect of the deposition potential on the coverage, i.e. immersing a clean electrode in a deposition solution under potential control, followed by ex situ measurement of the surface coverage in a blank electrolyte solution. [Pg.107]

From the above reasoning one could expect that the pre-deposition of small amounts of noble metals on the Ti02 surface in a form of the intermediate sub-layer, which can induce the electroactive electronic surface states in the Ti02 band gap, may enhance the electrocatalytic effect of subsequently deposited Cu particles. Actually, the photocatalytic deposition of silver particles in amount of 5xl014 atoms/cm-2, which on its own only slightly increases the electrocatalytic activity of Ti02 electrode, leads to 2-3-fold enhancement of the electrocatalytic activity of Cu particles subsequently deposited in a relatively high concentration (1016-1017 atoms/cm 2) [52],... [Pg.174]

Liljeroth et al. [80] used SECM in the feedback mode to study the electronic conductivity of a film of gold nanoparticles deposited at various pressures on a nonconductive substrate. They were able to observe an insulator-to-metal transition associated with a change in surface pressure. Unwin Whitworth et al. [83] have also developed a method to determine the electronic conductivity of ultrathin films using SECM under steady-state conditions. They obtained analytical approximations for the fitting of approach curves. The usefulness of their approach was demonstrated by investigating the effect of surface pressure on conductivity of a polyaniline monolayer at the water-air interface. [Pg.225]


See other pages where Effect of surface deposits is mentioned: [Pg.720]    [Pg.896]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.720]    [Pg.896]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.92]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.70 ]




SEARCH



Deposition surface

Effect of surface

© 2024 chempedia.info