Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Effect of anodic potential

Other studies by Drakesmith and Hughes [124] have used the fluorination of propene and octanoyl chloride as model compounds to investigate the effects of anode potential, current density, reactant concentration, temperature, etc. on reproducibility, product structure, distribution and yield in novel cell designs ranging in scale from 100 ml to 1001 cell capacities. [Pg.224]

The situation is completely different in the case of sol-gel derived compact anatase Ti02 films where the extent of charge recombination is largely reduced due to the effect of anodic potential, E, applied through the space charge layer. The anodic bias causes the surface electron density, Ns, to decrease with the applied potential as [21]... [Pg.6]

Cao XX, Fan MZ, Liang P, Huang X. Effects of anode potential on the electricity generation performance of Geobacter sulfurreducens. Chem J Chin Univ 2009 30 983-987. [Pg.28]

A similar approach was also used by Jung et al. [23] where they looked at, through EIS measurements, the effect of anode potential and pH on anodic biofilms, which were both found to have an effect on the performance in chronoamperometric and voltammetric measurements. We encourage the readers to go through that study as well to learn more about performing EIS measurements to understand electrode processes. [Pg.276]

In other words, the response (which for fast kinetics is more anodic compared to E° ), due to the competitive effects of the potential scan rate, moves towards more cathodic values by 30/n (mV) for every ten-fold increase in the scan rate. However, as shown in Figure 14, it is noted that at the same time the reverse peak tends to disappear, in that on increasing the scan rate, the species Z does not have time to restore Red. This is demonstrated by the current ratio zpr/zpf which is about 1 at low scan rates, but it tends to zero at high scan rates. [Pg.75]

The C.P.D. is obtained directly by the magnetron and the capacitor (or Kelvin) methods. Other methods which have proved successful rely on the variation of anode potential in a diode with constant cathode conditions. In this case, since adsorption changes the effective anode potential, the applied potential necessary to restore the anode current to its original value is equal to the C.P.D. between the two surfaces. As considered in Sec. II, a true average work function is measured in the C.P.D. method when the two conductors are separated by a distance which is much greater than the size of the patches on the surface. These conditions are invariably fulfilled in the capacitor and the space-charge-limited diode methods. [Pg.87]

Small quantities of fluorides often have a beneficial effect in electrolytic oxidation, e.g., of iodate to periodate and of sulfate to persulfate the part played by the fluoride is not clear, although in most instances its presence is accompanied by an increase of anode potential. Perchlorates have sometimes been added to solutions to improve the oxidation efficiency they have an effect similar to fluorides. [Pg.512]

The above CVs (Figs. 24 and 25) display well-formed reduction peaks independent of the blank solution and the type of active carbon materials. The combined shape of the cathodic peaks indicates that surface species participate in electrochemical processes in different local environments, or with various structures but convergent peak potentials. The effect of anodic polarization is more readily observed in a basic environment than in an acid solution. Similarly, a positive shift of cathodic peak potential with a decrease in anodic sweep potential limit takes place. Similar results were obtained for studies of electrochemical oxidation of graphite [17] and glass-like carbon [222] electrodes. There was considerable enlargement of both anodic and cathodic peaks after anodic polarization in 20% sulfuric acid (Fig. 26) [17]. [Pg.177]

Similar calculations that examine the effect of solution on the chemistry at the anode for both the hydrogen and the direct methanol fuel cells are currently begin carried out. While detailed studies on the effect of the potential dependence and solution effects have been studied, no one has begun to couple the two studies. It is clear that this will be very important for future efforts. [Pg.51]

These factors can be discussed with reference to the polarization curves for the initial and changing conditions within the occluded region. The combined effects of a potential drop into the pit and the effect of the lowered pH, which raises Epp and increases icrit, are also analyzed by reference to Fig. 7.6 (Ref 20). As previously assumed, the solid anodic curve is taken as representative of a stainless steel in an environment of pH = 1. The dashed extension again represents the anodic polarization behavior in the absence of a passive film. At a potential, Ecorr (or Epot if the potential is maintained potentiostatically), the passive current density would be iCOrr,pass and the active corrosion current density would be iCorr,act- Assume that a small flaw through the passive film is associated with an (IR), drop that lowers the potential in the bottom of the flaw to E,. Since this potential is higher than the passivating potential, Epp, this flaw should immediately repassivate and not propagate. [Pg.286]

Anodic inhibitors increase anode polarization to the critical passivation potential of the metal or alloy. They are called passivating inhibitors because they drastically decrease the corrosion current. Figure 14.2a and b illustrate the polarization and passivation effect of anodic inhibitors. These inhibitors are strong oxidizing agents and shift the corrosion potential of the metal in the noble direction with the formation of a passive film. [Pg.583]

The observed current decrease with time typical for potentiostatic experiments is not in contradiction with the fact that potentiodynamic experiments show a current plateau in the subcritical potential region. The plateau can be explained by two opposing effects on current. On one hand, surface enrichment diminishes the current with time and hence during a slow forward sweep with increasing potential. On the other hand, if the rate of anodic dissolution of the less noble component is charge transfer controlled, it increases with potential. As a consequence of the two opposing effects an anodic potential sweep leads to a dissolution current that varies little with... [Pg.301]

Wang X, Feng YJ, Ren NQ, Wang HM, Lee H, Li N, Zhao QL. Accelerated start-up of two-chambered microbial fuel cells effect of anodic positive poised potential. Elec-trochim Acta 2009 54 1109-1114. [Pg.28]

Such a situation may arise as a result of a continuous application of the electric current over a long period of time. As a matter of fact, electrochemical reactions take place at the electrodes, and in the absence of depolarizing species, water molecules are oxidized at the anodes and reduced at the cathodes (electrolytic reactions), with formaticHi of protons and hydroxyl anions, respectively. Once formed, these species tend to migrate under the effect of both potential and concentration gradients, allowing the development of an acidic front fmm the anode towards the cathode and of an alkaline frrnit in the opposite directimi (since the icaiic molrility of BF ions is 1.75 times that of OH i(Mis, the movement of protons will dominate the system chemistry). [Pg.722]

Employing PtRu/C catalysts, Dickinson et al. confirmed at 298 K flie higher activity of the catalyst formulation richer in Pt (i.e., Pt Ru at. ratio 3 2 vs. 1 1) over the entire range of anode potential from about 0.3 to 0.8 V vs. RHE [95]. However, at higher temperatures (318 K and 338 K) there was an interaction effect between thermal activation and anode potential. At both 318 and 338 K there was virtually no significant difference between the two compositions at potentials below 0.5 V vs. RHE. Only at E > 0.5 V did the formulation richer in Ru (1 1 atomic ratio) better performance at higher temperatures. [Pg.187]

Hence, a structure is anodically protected if the metal is active-passive and shows a sufficiently large passive potential range, eq. (9.1), due to the formation of a dynamic oxide film. This implies that the current density depends on time and therefore, the power supply must provide the required potential Ex so that ix < icorr [ ] Thus, anodic polarization results due to the formation of an insoluble oxide film of a few nm in thickness. The effectiveness of anodic protection depends on the quality of the oxide film in a particular environment and the applied potential. For instance, if the applied potential is Ex > Ep, then the film corrodes by pitting, which is a localized electrochemical process. On the other hand, if Ex < Epa the metal corrodes by general and uniform process. [Pg.296]

On a corroding metal surface, a mixed process occurs because the main reverse reaction is dissolution or oxidation (passivation) consequently, the net current is a function of the overpotential witii respect to the mixed (corrosion) potential (see Chap. 1). The anodic reaction and the H cathodic reaction proceed simultaneously close to the corrosion potential, which imphes that the HER may occur on a surface covered by an oxide film (passivated) and that the detrimental effects of anodic dissolution and H entry may be combined in the embrittlement process. [Pg.58]

It is worth noting that the crevice may favor pit initiation in two ways (a) the pitting potential of a stainless alloys decreases with increasing chloride content (Fig. 21a) (b) the restricted transport conditions may contribute to stabilize pit embryos at potentials lower than on the free surfaces [66]. This last point is supported by the experimental and modeling work of Laycock et al. [62]. Indeed, the deleterious effect of anodic polarization on the initiation time is obviously consistent with a pitting process. [Pg.371]

The effect of anode-cathode area ratios has an important bearing on the rate of corrosion. This can be explained by a plot of log J vs . In the plot (Fig. 3.13) current I is plotted vs E and not i (current density) to establish the effect of area ratio. To define the conditions, the reversible potential ° of Zn (—0.760 V) and hydrogen (0.00 V) are located in the diagram. The values for hydrogen reduction on zinc, io (H) on zinc (—1 cm ). [Pg.82]

In terms of potential, addition of anodic inhibitors reduces the difference of potential between the anodic and cathodic sites, and consequently reduce the driving force for corrosion reaction to occur. The potential of the anode shifts to the potential of the cathode. The number of metal ions dissolving as a result of anodic reaction is reduced, and the potential shifts in a more noble direction. Figure 6.2 illustrates the effect of anodic and cathodic inhibitors on the potential and the driving voltage. [Pg.355]

The discussion given here refers to processes at the cathode. However, analogous processes can be assumed to occur at the anode where the effect of the potential would be opposite i.e., the Fermi level would be lowered until it is coincident with the valency band of the solvent and holes could tunnel to it and transfer themselves to the cathode. [Pg.292]


See other pages where Effect of anodic potential is mentioned: [Pg.415]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.1238]    [Pg.1316]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.586]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.845]    [Pg.1744]    [Pg.3058]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.1271]    [Pg.1349]    [Pg.636]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.129]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.447 ]




SEARCH



Anode effect

Anode potential

© 2024 chempedia.info