Droplet distribution measurement

In the cases where liquid formulations are applied, calibration is normally performed by collecting the output volume over a given time period. Generally a minimum of three such measurements should be taken in order to estimate output consistency. Where output is collected from multiple nozzles or outlets, each nozzle or outlet should be evaluated in order to ensure uniformity of output across all the nozzles or outlets. If the deviation from the manufacturer s recommended value is not within 5% (or the value specified in an appropriate SOP), the nozzle or outlet should be replaced. The use of a patternator allows the droplet distribution pattern of the nozzles or outlets to be measured accurately, and this check should be conducted annually. Having estimated the output of the equipment, the time required to treat a specific area with a known quantity of test item solution can be calculated. 

The flow artifacts detected in the droplet size measurements are similar to those reported by Goux et al. [79] and Mohoric and Stepisnik [80]. In their work natural convection effects led to an increase in the decay of signal attenuation curves, causing over-prediction in the self-diffusion coefficient of pure liquids. In order to avoid flow effects in droplet size distributions, flow compensating pulse sequences such as the double PGSTE should be used. It has been demonstrated recently that this sequence facilitates droplet size measurements in pipe flows [81]. 

Studies of flow-induced coalescence are possible with the methods described here. Effects of flow conditions and emulsion properties, such as shear rate, initial droplet size, viscosity and type of surfactant can be investigated in detail. Recently developed, fast (3-10 s) [82, 83] PFG NMR methods of measuring droplet size distributions have provided nearly real-time droplet distribution curves during evolving flows such as emulsification [83], Studies of other destabilization mechanisms in emulsions such as creaming and flocculation can also be performed. 

Mathematical representation of droplet size distribution has been developed to describe entire droplet size distribution based on limited samples of droplet size measurements. This can overcome some drawbacks associated with the graphical representation and make the comparison and correlation of experimental results easier. A number of mathematical functions and empirical equations1423 427 for droplet size distributions have been proposed on the basis of... 

The studies on the performance of effervescent atomizer have been very limited as compared to those described above. However, the results of droplet size measurements made by Lefebvre et al.t87] for the effervescent atomizer provided insightful information about the effects of process parameters on droplet size. Their analysis of the experimental data suggested that the atomization quality by the effervescent atomizer is generally quite high. Better atomization may be achieved by generating small bubbles. Droplet size distribution may follow the Rosin-Rammler distribution pattern with the parameter q ranging from 1 to 2 for a gas to liquid ratio up to 0.2, and a liquid injection pressure from 34.5 to 345 kPa. The mean droplet size decreases with an increase in the gas to liquid ratio and/or liquid injection pressure. Any factor that tends to impair atomization quality, and increase the mean droplet size (for example, decreasing gas to liquid ratio and/or injection pressure) also leads to a more mono-disperse spray. 

Electrical methods involve the detection and analysis of electronic pulses generated by droplets in a measurement volume or on a wire. The electronic signals are then converted into digital data and calibrated to produce information on droplet size distribution. A detailed review of electrical methods for droplet size measurements has been made by Jones.[657]... 

It is probable that numerous interfacial parameters are involved (surface tension, spontaneous curvature, Gibbs elasticity, surface forces) and differ from one system to the other, according the nature of the surfactants and of the dispersed phase. Only systematic measurements of > will allow going beyond empirics. Besides the numerous fundamental questions, it is also necessary to measure practical reason, which is predicting the emulsion lifetime. This remains a serious challenge for anyone working in the field of emulsions because of the polydisperse and complex evolution of the droplet size distribution. Finally, it is clear that the mean-field approaches adopted to measure > are acceptable as long as the droplet polydispersity remains quite low (P < 50%) and that more elaborate models are required for very polydisperse systems to account for the spatial fiuctuations in the droplet distribution. 

In conclusion, droplet size measurements in the range 10 to 100 m can be performed, also in hostile environments, from the visibility of individual scattered signal. Advantages of this method are simultaneous measurement of particle size, concentration and velocity no calibration is necessary good spatial resolution up to less than 1 mm-3 the visibility is independent on particle trajectory. Limitations are individual scattered signal can be obtained only with moderate particle concentration it is difficult to automatically process scattered signals to extract the visibility value and to check validation conditions it seems very difficult to extend the technique to cover the entire spray distribution the lower limit in the small particle end of the distribution curve depends upon experimental sensitivities and V(d) curve flatness... 

Table 1. Droplet diameter measured by Dynamic Light Scattering experiments at 90° and distribution limits extracted from a multi-exponential analysis (10% brine in pure span 80)...

When assessing a nanoemulsion formation, the normal approach is to measure the droplet size distribution using dynamic light scattering techniques, including photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS). In this technique, the intensity fluctuation of light scattered by the droplets is measured as they undergo Brownian motion... 

Distribution Measurements. The equilibrium distributionsof various aromatics between the two liquid phases were measured experimentally. The acid phase and the organic phase were contacted at the desired temperature and vigorously shaken for several minutes in a separatory funnel. The acid phase was then allowed to separate from the organic phase, and it was then centrifuged to remove all dispersed organic droplets. The dissolved hydrocarbons in the acid phase were extracted with p-xylene, and the extract was analyzed using gas chromatography. 

Figure 4 Experimental configuration of laser diffraction analyzer used to measure droplet distributions produced by aqueous nebulizers. Droplet collection may be by im-pactor, as shown, or by simple filtration. (From Ref. 3.)...

The latter approach—completely drying the aerosol— while valid, is diffi-cnlt to perform experimentally (29). The low solids content of pharmaceutical nebulizer solutions results in dry aerosols that are too fine for reliable enough measurements to be made to allow back calculation with any accuracy. For example a typical nebulizer droplet distribution with a mass median diameter of 3 pm generated from a 0.1% drug solution would result in a dry particle distribution with a mass median diameter of 0.1 pm. Obtaining size distribution data with any reasonable resolution at this size is very problematic. A further issue is that the solids content of the original droplets must be known in order to perform the calculation, and this can vary considerably during the course of nebulization. This technique has therefore not been used extensively. 

There are multiple spray measurements used to quantify an injectors spray quality. Some of these measurements include DIO (arithmetic mean), D32 (Sauter mean diameter), D31 (evaporative mean diameter), DvO.9, and droplet distribution curve. Figure 15.9 provides a description and equation used to calculate SMD, DIO, and D31. Figure 15.10 shows a typical droplet distribution curve with an overlay to show the DvO.9 calculation. The DvO.9 value represents the point where... 

Lastly, droplet distribution curves and droplet size characteristic measurements were made for each of the sprays. Figure 15.13 shows the droplet size characteristics for the pressure swirl injector and Fig. 15.14 shows the droplet size characteristics for the liquid jet injector. The droplet size distribution is shown in both a cumulative and normalized sense. The cumulative volume fraction is used to determine DvO.l, DvO.5, and DvO.9 measurements. The calculated values for DIO, D31, and SMD are also shown on each plot. In general, the pressure swirl injector analyzed had a tighter distribution of injected droplets. The tighter distribution means that there are fewer larger droplets measured, which create smaller values for all of the key droplet characteristics, measured (D31, DIO, DvO.l, Dv05, DvO.9, and D32). 

Merkus HG, Marijnissen JCM, Jansma HL, Scarlett B (1994) Droplet size distribution measurements for medical nebulizers by the forward light scattering technique ( laser diffraction ). J Aerosol Sci 25(Suppl 1) 319... 

---