Drop count

Even basic tasks, such as testing for phosphonates, have not always proved to be that simple, as problems of nonreaction or interference during titration, etc. have marred the analytical process. Periodically, improvements in field analysis methods, such as phosphonate testing using UV lamp or microwave techniques, have improved matters. It is now becoming established practice in many parts of the world for the field testing of organic actives reserves to involve the use of a colorimeter (in addition to titration and drop-count methods, etc.), which has improved confidence levels. 

With the eye dropper, add some soap solution, drop by drop, to test tube No. 1, shaking the tube very hard between drops. Count how many drops are needed to make suds and record the number. To test tube No. 2, add some soap solution in the same manner and count again. To test tube No. 3, add some soap solution in the same way. Take test tube No. 4 from the rack and boil the liquid over the alcohol flame. Add some soap solution after it has cooled, and count the drops needed to form suds. To test tube No. 5 add soap solution only, shake, count the drops, and record the result. To test tube No. 6 add 1 teaspoonful of sodium tetraborate or potassium carbonate, then add some soap... 

The T.K. bottle, charged with 83 per cent HN03, should be calibrated. The acid should be added dropwise to a clean 5 ml measuring cylinder until the 2 ml mark is reached and the number of drops counted. It is advisable to place a small label on the T.K. bottle stating the number of drops per millilitre. 

If the elution time(s) of peaks of interest are known and reproducible, the user can program most microprocessor-based fraction collectors to automatically collect only the peaks of interest and discard the be-tween-peak eluent or peaks of noninterest. This is a variable time window programming mode, also known as Time Program plus Time (or Drop) mode, and involves a sequence of time-based collection and drain steps, as shown in Fig. 2. Each collection step is commonly referred to as a collection time window. It conveniently allows the user to define time intervals during which the column eluent is either collected into fractions or discarded into waste. Each selected peak will be subfractionated by equal slices based on time counting or drop counting. Column void volumes, equilibration volumes, and peaks of no interest are discarded. 

A fraction collector (Figure 15-7) is an apparatus that contains dozens of small test tubes or vials on a moveable rack. Modem collectors can be programmed to collect fractions by volume, counting drops or by time. They can be programmed further to collect only peaks of interest. The one shown can hold up to 174 12-13 mm tubes, and an LCD displays the tube number, drop count, and help messages. 

The use of highly accurate optical drop-counting devices increases the reliability and convenience of the drop weight method, making it a rather popular technique in the lab. 

In the automatic collectors based on drop counting a falling drop brings about an electric contact or activates a photo-electric cell. The resulting pulses are passed through a relay to a counter, which can be so set that after any desired number of drops a mechanism releasing the table is set in motion, whereby the latter moves on to the position of the next receiver. At the same time the counter automatically returns to zero. 

The maximum flow rate achieved by gravimetric based infusion systems can become limited by and by concurrent infusion from other sources through the same catheter. In drop-counting devices, flow rate uniformity suffers at low flow rates from the discrete nature of the drop detector. 

Add the vitamin C solution/fruit juice dropwise. Shake the tube after every five drops. Count the drops. 

It has been established that this is due to loss of gaseous C02 (Herbland, 1977). On the other hand unstable and dropping count rates resulted when the NaOH concentration exceeded a certain amount (5 mg NaOH/10 ml scintillation fluid in most cases). This was evidently due to the NaOH exhibiting the well known property of electrolytes in destroying, or "breaking", emulsions. 

When the aqueous solution of [U- C]oxalic acid that was used for the efficiency determinations was counted in the toluene-ethanol mixture (Hall and Cocking, 1965) a diminished and dropping count rate was noted. This was presumably due to adsorption and therefore insufficient carrier oxalic acid was present. The aqueous solution used contained 2% oxalic acid in addition to the [U- C]oxalic acid (74 mCi/mmol) and lO pi was counted in lO ml scintillation mixture, so each vial contained 200 yg oxalic acid. Therefore fresh samples were prepared in which 10 mg oxalic acid was dissolved in each vial before the [U- C]oxalic acid solution was added. (The mixture was found to be capable of dissolving at least 250 mg oxalic acid per 10 ml at 3°C). Even with this composition a drop in the count rate from these samples was detectable after three or four days. To date this has not been investigated further. 

For each Petri-Net that has an output for which a reduction in performance is noted, a voltage drop count variable is used to store the total amount of degradation in performance due to the failure relationships. Therefore for each output place in a degradation module Petri-Net, a voltage drop figure is added to the overall voltage drop count. 

The degradation rate was programmed to take affect per SSC, through the transition T1 in Figure 9. Therefore, for each time there is an instance of SSC, a degradation rate of 5.333 x 10 V is applied to a voltage drop count variable. 

Add the sugar solution from a burette or a pipette fitted with a rubber bulb, one drop at a time. Boil for a few seconds after addition of each drop. Count the drops. 

---