DRIFTS, analytical method

X-ray emission spectrography, in common with other analytical methods, is subject to errors of different kinds. Lacking better information, we shall usually assume these errors to be independent and random. (Drift caused by changes in the electronic system is definitely not random.) Before we consider errors in general, we shall examine one that is not only important and unavoidable, but that also sets x-ray... 

Methods to determine the a.i., and/or relevant metabolites in air during or shortly after the application must be submitted unless it can be justified that exposure of operators, workers, or bystanders does not occur. In SANCO/825/00 it is stated that spray drift and particle-associated as well as gaseous substances have to be taken into consideration because both can cause relevant exposure of operators, workers, or bystanders. Therefore, an analytical method must also be submitted for relevant substances with a low vapor pressure (< 10-5 Pa). 

Untreated (control) soil is collected to determine the presence of substances that may interfere with the measurement of target analytes. Control soil is also necessary for analytical recovery determinations made using laboratory-fortified samples. Thus, basic field study design divides the test area into one or more treated plots and an untreated control plot. Unlike the treated plots, the untreated control is typically not replicated but must be sufficiently large to provide soil for characterization, analytical method validation, and quality control. To prevent spray drift on to the control area and other potential forms of contamination, the control area is positioned > 15 m away and upwind of the treated plot, relative to prevailing wind patterns. 

FIGURE 2.1 Comparison of two different analytical methods. (A) Original data set comparing the concentration of the analyte (sample) and a reference material (RM), (B) concentrations after correction for drift, and (C) concentrations after correction for reference material offset. 

Product variability can be reduced through constant monitoring, either by SPC once enough batches have been manufactured, or through batch-to-batch comparisons of data. Where a specification range has been established, whether for an analytical method or a manufacturing process, it is very important to observe fluctuations and drifts in any direction. This is an easy and practical indicator that enables QA to anticipate potential product quality issues before they actually arise. 

There are analytical methods where it is impracticable to carry out a full calibration after every set of measurements. The analyst will need to demonstrate that the calibration has not significantly changed before carrying out another set of measurements. The analyst can prepare drift correction standards to carry out this check. A drift correction standard is a standard solution of known concentration used to monitor the calibration of an instrument. 

A quality control sample is a sample of known composition, very similar in terms of matrix and analyte concentration to the samples to be analysed. It is analysed along with the samples. The results are often plotted on a chart to monitor any significant drift in the performance of the analytical method - such a chart is known as a control chart (see Section 5.5). 

Statistics based on distributions of test results from large numbers of patients are useful for detecting systematic errors (shifts and drifts) but are of no value for detecting random errors (increased variability or scatter). They are useful adjuncts to the fundamental control procedures, which use stable control materials, but should not be substituted for them. Patient values include numerous sources of Yaria-tion—demographical, biological, pathological, and preana-lytical (see Chapter 17) —in addition to the analytical variation caused by the analytical method. As a result, individual test values have too much variability to have any utility for QC however, the mean of multiple test values or groups of patients is more stable and therefore maybe useful for control purposes. 

Lignocellulosic material can also be analyzed by IR spectrometry. This analytical method was used for characterization of modified lignin and cellulose in various ways <>. Quantification by infrared spectrometry has been reported, for example, in analysis of the three basic constituents in sweet gum and white oak chips pretreated at temperatures ranging from 140 to 280 C. > using the diffuse reflectance FTIR spectrometry (DRIFT). The technique is simple and applicable to powdered solids and dark samples and... 

Selectivity and versatility of measnrements have been enhanced through the use of a range of ion sources operated at ambient pressure and easily combined with drift tubes. Techniques to measure samples as liquids and solids, not only gases, have been incorporated significantly into IMS technology during the past decade and have transformed IMS from a vapor analyzer with niche applications to a measurement technique broadly applicable to semivolatile or nonvolatile substances. Indeed, a reason for the increase in visibility of mobility spectrometry as an analytical method is the combination of electrospray ionization (ESI) with drift tubes and the combination of mobility analyzers with mass spectrometers. This combination of ESI-IMS-MS with drift tnbes at ambient pressure and at reduced pressures of... 

A remarkable adaptation of technology borrowed from another analytical method was demonstrated for an electrospray ionization (ESI) IMS instrument ion injection to a drift tube was achieved through modulation with a mechanical chopper as found in atomic absorption spectrometry. The chopper was a disk with a small hole that would align with the source and drift tube and would operate as an ion injector. The disk had a second window that was used with optical sensors to synchronize ion injection and drift time, and ion injections were made at pulse rates of 5 to 200 Hz with pulse widths of 200 to 500 ps. 

The reproducibility of signal intensities and drift times had, before 1990, not been considered widely in reports or journal articles on IMS, possibly since detection limits were the main concern. Consequently, there is only a relatively brief record available in the literature on the repeatability of IMS measurements, which is a key to any quantitative analytical method. The few examples that are available are concerned with short-term repeatability, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) for peak areas in these is between 5% and 25%. In one study with a handheld IMS analyzer, reproducibility was 6 to 21% RSD for 5 to 2,500 ng of dialkylphthalates, as shown in Table 8.2. Measurements of hydrazine vapors at 10 to 200 ppb using the same instrument showed precision of about 3 to 16% RSD for these high-reactive and -adsorptive chanicals. ... 

Anions have also been determined using conventional IMS with an FSI ion source and included arsenate, phosphate, sulfate, nitrate, nitrite, chloride, formate, and acetate. Distinct peak patterns and reduced mobility constants were observed for respective anions. Application to authentic water samples for the determination of nitrate and nitrite demonstrated the feasibility of using FSI-IMS as a rapid analytical method for monitoring nitrate and nitrite in water systems. The method was used for on-site measurement by exchanging air for nitrogen as the drift gas without complications. The linear dynamic range was 1,000, and detection limits were 10 ppb for nitrate and 40 ppb for nitrite. 

---