Dispersion models wind speed

In its most common form, a trajectory model moves a vertical column, with a square cross section intersecting the ground, at the mean wind speed, with pollutants added to the bottom of the column as they are generated by each location over which the column passes. Treatment of vertical dispersion varies among models, from those which assume immediate vertical mixing throughout the column to those which assume vertical dispersion using a vertical coefficient with a suitable profile (15). 

Plume height is based on the assumed F stability and 2.5 m/s wind speed, and the dispersion parameter (o, ) incorporates the effects of buoyancy induced dispersion. If x , is less than 200 m, then no shoreline fumigation calculation is made, since the plume may still be influenced by transitional rise and its interaction with the TIBL is more difficult to model. 

Gaussian dispersion models based on Turner s Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates, PHS Pub. No. 999-AP-26. Different air stabilities and wind speeds are used. 

Meteorology plays an important role in determining the height to which pollutants rise and disperse. Wind speed, wind shear and turbulent eddy currents influence the interaction between the plume and surroimding atmosphere. Ambient temperatures affect the buoyancy of a plume. However, in order to make equations of a mathematical model solvable, the plume rise is assumed to be only a function of the emission conditions of release, and many other effects are considered insignificant. 

Use the Britter-McQuaid dense gas dispersion model to determine the distance to the 1% concentration for a release of chlorine gas. Assume that the release occurs over a duration of 500 s with a volumetric release rate of 1 m3/s. The wind speed at 10 m height is 10 m/s. The boiling point for the chlorine is —34°C, and the density of the liquid at the boiling point is 1470 kg/m3. Assume ambient conditions of 298 K and 1 atm. 

Gifford and Hanna tested their simple box model for particulate matter and sulfur dioxide predictions for annual or seasonal averages against diffusion-model predictions. Their conclusions are summarized in Table 5-3. The correlation coefficient of observed concentrations versus calculated concentrations is generally higher for the simple model than for the detailed model. Hanna calculated reactions over a 6-h period on September 30, 1%9, with his chemically reactive adaptation of the simple dispersion model. He obtained correlation coefficients of observed and calculated concentrations as follows nitric oxide, 0.97 nitrogen dioxide, 0.05 and rhc, 0.55. He found a correlation coefficient of 0.48 of observed ozone concentration with an ozone predictor derived from a simple model, but he pointed out that the local inverse wind speed had a correlation of 0.66 with ozone concentration. He derived a critical wind speed formula to define a speed below which ozone prediction will be a problem with the simple model. Further performance of the simple box model compared with more detailed models is discussed later. 

Datametrics Model lOOVT Air Flow Meter. Measurements were taken at various locations above the soil or water surface at a height of 0.8 cm, where the laminar air flow velocity was greatest. Depending on the probe location relative to the air dispersion tube, the measured wind speed varied from 0.5 to 1.5 m/s, with an average of 1 m/s. At greater heights above the surface, the air flow rate was much lower and the air flow patterns were unknown. 

The Gaussian plume model estimates the average pheromone flux by multiplying the measured odor concentration by mean wind speed, using the following formula (Elkinton etal, 1984). Everything is the same as in the Sutton model, except that ay and az, respectively, replace the terms Cy and Cz of the Sutton model. Dispersion coefficients are determined for each experiment separately. 

Source-dispersion and receptor-oriented models have a common physical basis. Both assume that mass arriving at a receptor (sampling site) from source j was transported with conservation of mass by atmospheric dispersion of source emitted material. From the source-dispersion model point of view, the mass collected at the receptor from source j, Mj, Is the dependent variable which Is equal to the product of a dispersion factor, Dj (which depends on wind speed, wind direction, stability, etc.) and an emission rate factor, Ej, 1. e. , ... 

The dispersion modeling for the unmitigated case predicts a distance of 5 km for the concentration to be reduced to 20 ppm, under F/l weather conditions. As in the other examples the higher wind speed and turbulence of more severe meteorological conditions result in a more rapid dilution and a smaller hazard zone. 

Atmospheric transport and dispersion processes are expressed in an airshed model in numerous way. Wind speed and direction enter through the component variables, u, v, and to (or more generally u x,y,z,t)). The... 

One commonly used suite of models that is based on Gaussian plume modeling is the Industrial Source Complex (ISC) Dispersion Models (US EPA, 1995). This suite includes both a short-term model (ISCST), which calculates the hourly air pollutant concentrations in an area surrounding a source, as well as a long-term model (ISCLT), which calculates the average air pollutant concentrations over a year or longer. ISCLT uses meteorological data summarized by frequency for 16 radial sectors (22.5° each) this data format is referred to as a stability array (STAR). Within each sector of STAR, joint frequencies of wind direction, wind speed, and atmospheric stability class are provided. 

We conclude that over the continuum scale the determining parameters are the wind speed Uh and turbulence initial parameters of the cloud/plume when it reaches the top of the canopy or, equivalently, the virtual source at the level of the canopy. Using suitable fast approximate models for the flow field over urban areas (e.g. RIMPUFF, FLOWSTAR), the variation of the mean velocity and turbulence above the canopy can be calculated. The FLOWSTAR code (Carruthers et al., 1988 [105]) has been extended to predict how (Uc) varies within the canopy. Dispersion downwind of the canopy can also be estimated using cloud/plume profiles, denoted by Gc,w,GA,w which are shown in Figures 2.20 and 2.22. 

Hunt, J.C.R. (1996) Atmospheric diffusion from a steady source in a turbulent airflow at low mean wind speeds, Note to UK Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling Working Group (National Radiological Protection Board), Report R292,19-22. 

Flux is a somewhat abstract entity and does not relate this information directly. It quantifies the chemical movement rate across an interface plane into a receiving media such as the air boundary layer (BL) in the above example. Only when it is coupled with an air dispersion model does it produce concentrations in air. In the case of a large soil surface area source, a simple relationship exists between flux and concentration. For neutral air stability conditions in the atmospheric BL with steady-state wind speed v (m/sec), the concentration in air, c (mg/m ), can be approximated by... 

---