Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Model intercomparison

Shatalov V., Mantseva, E., Baait, A., et al. (2004). POP Model Intercomparison Study. Stage I. Comparison of Descriptions of Main Processes Determining POP Behaviour in Various Environmental Compartments. MSC-E Technical Report 1/2004. [Pg.435]

It is common in model intercomparisons that relatively good agreement is obtained for the major species NOx and 03 but the discrepancies can be larger for trace species such as HCHO and H202. This can be... [Pg.891]

Olson, J., M. Prather, T. Berntsen, G. Carmichael, R. Chatfield, P. Connell, R. Derwent, L. Horowitz, S. Jin, M. Kanakidou, P. Kasibhatla, R. Kotamarthi, M. Kuhn, K. Law, J. Penner, L. Perliski, S. Sillman, F. Stordal, A. Thompson, and O. Wild, Results from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change Photochemical Model Intercomparison (PhotoComp), J. Geophys. Res., 102, 5979-5991 (1997). [Pg.939]

Olson J., Prather M., Rasch P., et al. (1997) Results from the Intergovernmental Panel of Change photochemical model intercomparison (PhotoComp), J. Geophys. Res., 102, 5979-5991. [Pg.23]

Gates, W. L. (with 15 other authors), 1999 An overview of the results of the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP). Bull Amer. Meteor, Soc., 80,29-55. [Pg.118]

K. G, Schnur, R., Strassmann, K., Weaver, A. J., Yoshikawa, C., and Zeng, N. (2006). Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis Results from the (CMIP)-M-4 model intercomparison. J. Climate 19(14), 3337-3353. [Pg.264]

AIBS AIDS AIRS AMAP AMIP AMSR-E AMSU American Institute of Biological Sciences Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome Atmospheric InfraRed Sounder Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Program Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for EOS Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit... [Pg.582]

Poppe D, Andersson-Skold Y, Baart A, Builtjes PJH et al (1996) Gas-phase reactions in atmospheric chemistry and transport models a model intercomparison. EUROTRAC a EUREKA environmental project. EUROTRAC international scientific secretariat, Garmisch-Parten-kirchen... [Pg.74]

Cox R, Bauer BL, Smith T (1998) Mesoscale model intercomparison. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79 265-283... [Pg.206]

LeTreut, H. and McAvaney, B. J. (1999). Model intercomparison Slab Ocean 2 X CO2 Equilibrium Experiments. Submitted. [Pg.28]

Jousaume, S. and Taylor, K. (1995). Status of the paleoclimate modeling intercomparison project. In Proceedings of the first international AMIP scientific conference. pp. 425-430. WCRP Report. [Pg.70]

Coe, M. T. and Harrison, S. P. (2000). A comparison of the simulated surface water area in norhtern Africa for the 6000 year B.P. PMIP experiments. In Paleoclimate Modeling Intercomparison Project, Proceedings of the Third Conference." (P. Braconnot, Ed.),WCRP. [Pg.83]

U., and Wurth, G. (1998). Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models through simulations of the seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO, Fir,st results of a model intercomparison study. Global Biogcochem. Cycles 12, 1-24. [Pg.243]

Denning, A. S., ct til. (1929). Three-dimensional transport and concentration of atmospheric CO. A model intercomparison study (TRANSCO.M 2). TcUhs, 51B, 266-297. [Pg.252]

CO2. Underlying all these is a model of the physical circulation of the ocean, usually arising from an ocean general circulation model. Three such estimates of the air-sea carbon flux are shown in Figure 1. The estimates are taken from the Ocean Carbon Model Intercomparison (OCMIP) (Orr, 1997). [Pg.286]

Figure 2 Model-intercomparison study reported by Orr in 2004 showing fraction of CO2, injected from 2000 through 2100, that remains isolated from the atmosphere as a function of time and injection depth. Results are averaged over seven injection locations. Most of the CO2 that does interact with the atmosphere remains in the ocean (see Table 1), so the amount of CO2 remaining in the ocean is much greater than shown here. Reprinted with permission from lEA Greenhouse Gas R D Programme. Figure 2 Model-intercomparison study reported by Orr in 2004 showing fraction of CO2, injected from 2000 through 2100, that remains isolated from the atmosphere as a function of time and injection depth. Results are averaged over seven injection locations. Most of the CO2 that does interact with the atmosphere remains in the ocean (see Table 1), so the amount of CO2 remaining in the ocean is much greater than shown here. Reprinted with permission from lEA Greenhouse Gas R D Programme.
Ocean Carbon-Cycle Model Intercomparison Project (OCMIP), Institut Pierre Simon Laplace. [Pg.522]

Barth, M. C., S. Sillman, R. Hudman, M. Z. Jacobson, C.-H. Kim, A. Monod and J. Liang (2003) Summary of the cloud chemistry modeling intercomparison Photochemical box model simulation. Journal of Geophysical Research 108, 4214, doi 10.1029/2002JD002673. Bates, D. R. and M. Nicolet (1950) The photochemistry of the atmospheric water vapour. Journal of Geophysical Research 55, 301-327... [Pg.615]


See other pages where Model intercomparison is mentioned: [Pg.93]    [Pg.790]    [Pg.838]    [Pg.891]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.557]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.1483]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.696]    [Pg.1664]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.624]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.388]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.173 ]




SEARCH



Intercomparison

Ocean Carbon Model Intercomparison

Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison

Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project

© 2024 chempedia.info