Diffusive/advective transport equation

Transport Processes and Gauss Theorem One-Dimensional Diffusion/Advection/Reaction Equation Box 22.1 One-Dimensional Diffusion/Advection/Reaction Equation at Steady-State... 

When the Damkoehler number is 1, rates of transformation losses and diffusion/ advection transport are equal. This happens when z is the characteristic depth or the average depth of penetration for chemical molecules moving into a soil layer from its surface (Cowan et al., 1995). When Ada is 1, Equation 8.5 can be rearranged to find the z corresponding to the characteristic penetration depth, a parameter we label z. ... 

The quantity k is related to the intensity of the turbulent fluctuations in the three directions, k = 0.5 u u. Equation 41 is derived from the Navier-Stokes equations and relates the rate of change of k to the advective transport by the mean motion, turbulent transport by diffusion, generation by interaction of turbulent stresses and mean velocity gradients, and destmction by the dissipation S. One-equation models retain an algebraic length scale, which is dependent only on local parameters. The Kohnogorov-Prandtl model (21) is a one-dimensional model in which the eddy viscosity is given by... 

In the case of pure advection (no molecular transport), the diffusion term in the general transport equation (8.2.5) is made equal to zero and time-dependent mass balance is expressed as... 

To quantify such transport, the advection-dispersion equation, which requires a narrow pore-size distribution, often is used in a modified framework. Van Genuchten and Wierenga (1976) discuss a conceptualization of preferential solute transport throngh mobile and immobile regions. In this framework, contaminants advance mostly through macropores containing mobile water and diffuse into and out of relatively immobile water resident in micropores. The mobile-immobile model involves two coupled equations (in one-dimensional form) ... 

Regardless of the transport equation considered, the major effect of sorption on contaminant breakthrough curves is to delay the entire curve on the time axis, relative to a passive (nonsorbing) contaminant. Because of the longer residence time in the porous medium, advective-diffusive-dispersive interactions also are affected, so that longer (non-Fickian) tailing in the breakthrough curves is often observed. 

In this situation, transport equations similar to those discussed previously can be applied. For example, by assuming sorption to be essentially instantaneous, the advective-dispersion equation with a reaction term (Saiers and Hornberger 1996) can be considered. Alternatively, CTRW transport equations with a single ti/Ci, t) can be applied or two different time spectra (for the dispersive transport and for the distribution of transfer times between mobile and immobile—diffusion, sorption— states can be treated Berkowitz et al. 2008). 

If transport is by diffusion and advection (effective velocity), the transport equation is... 

In this form one sees an analogy in the vorticity equation to the other transport equations— a substantial-derivative description of advective transport, a Laplacian describing the diffusive transport, and possibly a source term. It is interesting to observe that the vorticity equation does not involve the pressure. Since pressure always exerts a normal force that acts through the center of mass of a fluid packet (control volume), it cannot alter the rotation rate of the fluid. That is, pressure variations cannot cause a change in the vorticity of a flow field. 

From now on, the permeation in (16) is neglected as it is several orders of magnitude smaller than the advection due to the radial component of the velocity vr (now playing the role of vz in the planar case). As far as the velocity perturbation is concerned, our aim is to describe its principal effect-the radial motion of smectic layers, i.e., instead of diffusion (permeation) we now have advective transport. In this spirit we make several simplifications to keep the model tractable. The backflow-flow generation due to director reorientation-is neglected, as well as the effect of anisotropic viscosity (third and fourth line of (19)). Thereby (19) is reduced to the Navier-Stokes equation for the velocity perturbation, which upon linearization takes the form... 

This study has shown that the application of EO can move TCE from a contaminated zone across an intact column of tight soil. The output from a ID diffusion-advection equation agrees well with the observed TCE concentration profiles, indicating that the transport equation is an appropriate model. 

Stute et al. (1992) made numerical calculation to study flow dynamics of the Great Hungarian Plain (GHP) aquifer system with the use of He concentration data. They solved the diffusion-advection equation for He transport for a two-dimensional case. 

Section 3.2 introduced the governing equations for three physical processes responsible for transporting material in living systems advection, drift, and diffusion. Advection refers to the process by which solutes are transported with the bulk... 

To normalize the governing equations, we introduce a dimensionless position, z = x/a, and two dimensionless dependent variables,/ =/// and u = ua/DD. Note that the normalized velocity m is equivalent to a local Peclet number, indicating the relative magnitudes of the advective and diffusive fluxes of the reactive species. Applying these definitions to the transport equations yields the dimensionless governing equations... 

Because of the success encountered by finite elements in the solution of elliptic problems, it was extended (in the 80s) to the advection or transport equation which is a hyperbolic equation with only one real characteristic. This equation can be solved naturally for an analytical velocity field by solving a time differential equation. It appeared important, when the velocity field was numerically obtained, to be able to solve simultaneously propagation and diffusion equations at low cost. By introducing upwinding in test functions or in the discretization scheme, the particular nature of the transport equation was considered. In this case, a particular direction is given at each point (the direction of the convecting flow) and boundary conditions are only considered on the part of the boundary where the flow is entrant. 

If transport occurs much faster than sorption, sorption processes may not reach equilibrium conditions. Nonequilibrium sorption may result from physical causes such as intraparticle rate-limited diffusion, chemical causes such as rate-limiting reaction kinetics, or a combination of the two. One approach used to model rate-limited sorption is bi-continuum models consisting of one region where transport is described by the advection-dispersion equation with equilibrium sorption, and another region where transport is diffusion limited with equilibrium sorption, or another region where sorption is chemically rate limited. 

This result shows that for the -equation (1.415), only the advective term is negligible. The transport equation for the dissipation rate cannot be further reduced, and we recognize that the diffusion term in the -equation may play an important role in near wall flows. 

Let us temporary assume that the velocity and density fields are known, hence F and Fg can be determined. By that means (12.88) reduces to a transport equation for the property with only one unknown variable. However, in order to solve the convection-diffusion equation we need to approximate the transport property V at the e and w faces. A few classical convec-tion/advection schemes are outlined in the subsequent sections. 

When using moment methods for inhomogeneous systems, the moment set is transported in physical space due to advection, diffusion, and free transport. Since the moment-transport equations are derived from a transport equation for the NDE, the problem of moment transport is closely related to the problem of transporting the NDF. Denoting the NDE by n(t, X, ), the process of spatial transport involves changes in n(t, x, ) for fixed values... 

In this section, we introduce KBFVM for the moment-transport equations and show how they can be formulated to guarantee that the updated moment set is realizable. A more detailed presentation can be found in Appendix B. For clarity, we begin with the PBF and then discuss the additional complications that arise with the KF and, finally, the GPBF. Because the advection term is the principal cause of unrealizable moment sets, we limit our discussion to this term and focus on the high-order spatial reconstruction needed in order to reduce numerical diffusion. The material in this section follows roughly the work of Vikas et al. (2011a, 2012), and the reader is referred there and to Appendix B for more details. 

Imboden and Schwarzenbach (1985) have illustrated how the mass-balance equation is a means of accounting for chemical and biological reactions that produce or consume a chemical within a test volume, and for transport processes dial import or export the chemical across the boundaries. Each process acting on a chemical can be characterized by an environmental first-order rate constant, expressed in units of time-1. Transport mechanisms include water renewal by nvers, horizontal and vertical turbulent diffusion, advection by lake particles, and settling of particles (Imboden and Schwarzenbach, 1985). Chemical reaction i ales and reaction half-lives for a wide variety of reactions have been summarized by I loffmann (1981), Pankow and Morgan(1981), Morgan and Stone(1985),and Santsehi (1988). 

The left-hand side represents the advection (or convection) of vorticity by the velocity u, and the second term on the right-hand side represents the transport of vorticity by diffusion (with diffusivity = the kinematic viscosity v). These two terms are familiar in the sense that they resemble the convection and diflusion terms appearing in the transport equation for any passive scalar. A counterpart to the second term does not appear in these transport equations, however. Known as the production term, it is associated with the intensification of vorticity that is due to stretching of vortex lines. It is not a true production term, however, because it cannot produce vorticity where none exists. Indeed, because (10-5) contains to linearly in every term, it is clear that vorticity can be neither created nor destroyed in the interior of an isothermal, incompressible fluid It can only be convected, diffused, or changed in magnitude once it is already present.6... 

---