Separation equations with diffusion

Approximate Solutions of Chemical Separation Equations with Diffusion... 

Grady and Asay [49] estimate the actual local heating that may occur in shocked 6061-T6 Al. In the work of Hayes and Grady [50], slip planes are assumed to be separated by the characteristic distance d. Plastic deformation in the shock front is assumed to dissipate heat (per unit area) at a constant rate S.QdJt, where AQ is the dissipative component of internal energy change and is the shock risetime. The local slip-band temperature behind the shock front, 7), is obtained as a solution to the heat conduction equation with y as the thermal diffusivity... 

When combined with the Fourier expansion of functions, separation of variables is another powerful method of solutions which is particularly useful for systems of finite dimensions. Regardless of boundary conditions, we decompose the solution C(x, t), where the dependence of C on x and t is temporarily emphasized, to the general one-dimensional diffusion equation with constant diffusion coefficient... 

There are few studies in literature reporting pure gas permeabilities as well as separation factors of mixtures. Vuren et al. (1987) reported Knudsen diffusion behavior of pure gases for y-alumina membranes with a mean pore radius of 1.2 nm. Separation experiments with a 1 1 H2/N2 mixture showed, that the theoretical Knudsen separation factor [of 3.7, Equation 6.4)j for this mixture could be obtained (Keizer et al. 1988 see also Figure 6.2). In Figure 6.2, the effect of process parameters is also demonstrated. The separation factor is a function of the pressure ratio over the membrane, which is the ratio of the pressure on the permeate-side to that on the feed-side. For pressure ratios approaching unity, which means the pressure on both sides of the... 

As noted earlier, air-velocity profiles during inhalation and exhalation are approximately uniform and partially developed or fully developed, depending on the airway generation, tidal volume, and respiration rate. Similarly, the concentration profiles of the pollutant in the airway lumen may be approximated by uniform partially developed or fully developed concentration profiles in rigid cylindrical tubes. In each airway, the simultaneous action of convection, axial diffusion, and radial diffusion determines a differential mass-balance equation. The gas-concentration profiles are obtained from this equation with appropriate boundary conditions. The flux or transfer rate of the gas to the mucus boundary and axially down the airway can be calculated from these concentration gradients. In a simpler approach, fixed velocity and concentration profiles are assumed, and separate mass balances can be written directly for convection, axial diffusion, and radial diffusion. The latter technique was applied by McJilton et al. 

With so many uncertainties, it is hardly surprising that the difficulties inherent in a successful application of the diffusion equation (or molecular pair analysis) to recombination probability experiments are very considerable. Chemically induced dynamic polarisation (Sect. 4) is a fairly new technique which may assist in the study of recombination of radicals following their diffusive separation from the solvent cage. 

Equation (8.8) shows that the efficiency of separation increases with the applied voltage. Macromolecules, whose diffusion coefficients are lower than those of small molecules, tend to give better separations (Fig. 8.11). 

Exercise. Two particles diffuse independently. Show that their mutual distance obeys the diffusion equation, with a diffusion constant equal to the sum of the diffusion constants of the separate particles. 510... 

The hydrated layer has finite thickness, therefore the exchanging ions can diffuse inside this layer, although their mobility is quite low compared to that in water (n 10-11cm2s-1 V-1). As we have seen in the liquid junction, diffusion of ions with different velocities results in charge separation and formation of the potential. In this case, the potential is called the diffusion potential and it is synonymous with the junction potential discussed earlier. It can be described by the equation developed for the linear diffusion gradient, that is, by the Henderson equation (6.24). Because we are dealing with uni-univalent electrolytes, the multiplier cancels out and this diffusion potential can be written as... 

The probability function /(t) gives the unity probability when the pair is within the interval —a/2integrating Equation 6.135 between the limits x = al2 with t 0. The diffusion coefficient D is the sum of the individual diffusion coefficients 1), knTI(mr)Vj (Einstein equation), where rt is the radius of the component i of the radical-ion pair. Integration of Equation 6.135 between the limits — °° < x < all and all < x < oo gives the probability of a diffusively separated pair (Equation 6.136). 

Indeed the diversion to side products during thallation coincides with the direct obsovation of the arene radical cation as a transient intermediate both by UV-visible and ESR spectroscopy. A similar dichotomy between the products of mercuration and thallation exists with durene, albeit to a lesser degree. Finally no discrepancy is observed with mesitylene, nuclear substitution occuiring exclusively in both mercuration and thallation. Such a divergence between mercuration and thallation can be reconciled by the formulation in Scheme 6 if they difier by the extent to which di sive separation (ki) occurs in equation (31). All factors being the same, diffusive separation of the radical pair from thallium(III) should... 

Several models use the mass balance in Eq. 2.2 (ideal and equUibrimn-disper-sive models. Sections 2.2.1 and 2.2.2) as derived here without combining it with kinetic equations. In the latter case, Di in Eq. 2.2, which accounts only for axial diffusion, bed tortuosity, and eddy diffusion, is replaced with Da, which accoimts also for the effect of the mass transfer resistances. This is legitimate imder certain conditions, as explained later in Section 2.2.6. Other simple models account for a more complex mass transfer kinetics by coupling Eq. 2.2 with a kinetic equation (lumped kinetic models. Section 2.2.3) in which case Di is used. More complex models write separate mass balance equations for the stream of mobile phase percolating through the bed and for the mobile phase stagnant inside the pores of the particles (the general rate model and the lumped pore diffusion or FOR model, see later Sections 2.1.7 and 2.2.4). 

An alternative electrochemical approach to the measurement of fast interfacial kinetics exploits the use of the scanning electrochemical microscope (SECM). A schematic of this device is shown in Fig. 14 the principle of the method rests on the perturbation of the intrinsic diffusive flux to the microelectrode, described by Eq. (34) above. A number of reviews of the technique exist [109,110]. In the case of the L-L interface, the microelectrode probe is moved toward the interface once the probe-interface separation falls within the diffusion layer, a perturbation of the current-distance response is seen, which can be used to determine the rate of interfacial processes, generally by numerical solution of the mass-transport equations with appropriate interfacial boundary conditions. The method has been... 

Northrup and Hynes [103] have remarked that the effects of the potential of mean force as well as hydrodynamic repulsion are very much more apparent in their effect on the survival (and escape) probability of a reactant pair of radicals than their effect on the rate coefficient. For instance, considering the escape probability of Fig. 20, suppose that an escape probability of 0.75 had been determined experimentally. Initial distances of separation Tq = 4i or 312 would have been deduced from the diffusion equation analysis alone or from the diffusion equation with the potential of mean force and hydrodynamic repulsion included. Again, the effect of a moderately slow rate of reaction of encounter pairs further reduces the recombination probability. Consequently, as the inherent uncertainty in the magnitudes of U r), D(r) and feact may be as much as a factor of 2, the estimation of an initial separation distance, Tq, of a radical pair from experimental measurements of escape probabilities may be in doubt by a factor of 30% or more. Careful and detailed analysis of the recombination of radical pairs has been made by Northrup and Hynes... 

---