Diffusion reaction control

The remarkable goodness of fits (x2 = 0.95 and R2 = 0.989) over the entire range of experimental data by the mixed diffusion-reaction control model is shown by a thick solid curve in Figure 9b. Thus, the growth of the PVP-capped ZnO nanorods deviates sufficiently from the diffusion-limited Ostwald ripening model and follows a mechanism involving both diffusion-control and surface reaction control. 

Additionally, another quite plausible model, i.e., an ash diffusion reaction control model, was tested (see Eq. 28) [321] for the imide pyrolysis. 

Figure 6. Comparison between the shapes of the normalised polarisation curves in the two limiting oases (a) and (c) diffusion-reaction control (b) and (d) reaction control. =0.1 (curves a and b) and 0.95 (curves c and d). Temperature 298 K.

Figure C2.8.4. The solid line shows a typical semilogaritlimic polarization curve (logy against U) for an active electrode. Different stages of reaction control are shown in tlie anodic and catliodic regimes tlie linear slope according to an exponential law indicates activation control at high anodic and catliodic potentials tlie current becomes independent of applied voltage, indicating diffusion control.

The production of hydroxide ions creates a localized high pH at the cathode, approximately 1—2 pH units above bulk water pH. Dissolved oxygen reaches the surface by diffusion, as indicated by the wavy lines in Figure 8. The oxygen reduction reaction controls the rate of corrosion in cooling systems the rate of oxygen diffusion is usually the limiting factor. 

The reaction kinetics approximation is mechanistically correct for systems where the reaction step at pore surfaces or other fluid-solid interfaces is controlling. This may occur in the case of chemisorption on porous catalysts and in affinity adsorbents that involve veiy slow binding steps. In these cases, the mass-transfer parameter k is replaced by a second-order reaction rate constant k. The driving force is written for a constant separation fac tor isotherm (column 4 in Table 16-12). When diffusion steps control the process, it is still possible to describe the system hy its apparent second-order kinetic behavior, since it usually provides a good approximation to a more complex exact form for single transition systems (see Fixed Bed Transitions ). 

Kassner used a rotating disc, for which the hydrodynamic conditions are well defined, to study the dissolution kinetics of Type 304 stainless steel in liquid Bi-Sn eutectic. He established a temperature and velocity dependence of the dissolution rate that was consistent with liquid diffusion control with a transition to reaction control at 860 C when the speed of the disc was increased. The rotating disc technique has also been used to investigate the corrosion stability of both alloy and stainless steels in molten iron sulphide and a copper/65% calcium melt at 1220 C . The dissolution rate of the steels tested was two orders of magnitude higher in the molten sulphide than in the metal melt. 

The role of bulk diffusion in controlling reaction rates is expected to be significant during surface (catalytic-type) processes for which transportation of the bulk participant is slow (see reactions of sulphides below) or for which the boundary and desorption steps are fast. Diffusion may, for example, control the rate of Ni3C hydrogenation which is much more rapid than the vacuum decomposition of this solid. 

Fig. 2a-c. Kinetic zone diagram for the catalysis at redox modified electrodes a. The kinetic zones are characterized by capital letters R control by rate of mediation reaction, S control by rate of subtrate diffusion, E control by electron diffusion rate, combinations are mixed and borderline cases b. The kinetic parameters on the axes are given in the form of characteristic currents i, current due to exchange reaction, ig current due to electron diffusion, iji current due to substrate diffusion c. The signpost on the left indicates how a position in the diagram will move on changing experimental parameters c% bulk concentration of substrate c, Cq catalyst concentration in the film Dj, Dg diffusion coefficients of substrate and electrons k, rate constant of exchange reaction k distribution coefficient of substrate between film and solution d> film thickness (from ref. 

Whitaker, S, Transient Diffusion, Adsorption and Reaction in Porous Catalysts The Reaction Controlled, Quasi-Steady Catalytic Surface, Chemical Engineering Science 41, 3015, 1986. 

Leblanc and Fogler developed a population balance model for the dissolution of polydisperse solids that included both reaction controlled and diffusion-controlled dissolution. This model allows for the handling of continuous particle size distributions. The following population balance was used to develop this model. 

The rate of agitation, stirring, or flow of solvent, if the dissolution is transport-controlled, but not when the dissolution is reaction-con-trolled. Increasing the agitation rate corresponds to an increased hydrodynamic flow rate and to an increased Reynolds number [104, 117] and results in a reduction in the thickness of the diffusion layer in Eqs. (43), (45), (46), (49), and (50) for transport control. Therefore, an increased agitation rate will increase the dissolution rate, if the dissolution is transport-controlled (Eqs. (41 16,49,51,52), but will have no effect if the dissolution is reaction-controlled. Turbulent flow (which occurs at Reynolds numbers exceeding 1000 to 2000 and which is a chaotic phenomenon) may cause irreproducible and/or unpredictable dissolution rates [104,117] and should therefore be avoided. 

The diffusivity, D, of the dissolved solute, if dissolution is transport-controlled (Eqs. 41-46,49,51,52). The dissolution rate of a reaction-controlled system will be independent of D. 

The performance of a reactor for a gas-solid reaction (A(g) + bB(s) -> products) is to be analyzed based on the following model solids in BMF, uniform gas composition, and no overhead loss of solid as a result of entrainment. Calculate the fractional conversion of B (fB) based on the following information and assumptions T = 800 K, pA = 2 bar the particles are cylindrical with a radius of 0.5 mm from a batch-reactor study, the time for 100% conversion of 2-mm particles is 40 min at 600 K and pA = 1 bar. Compare results for /b assuming (a) gas-film (mass-transfer) control (b) surface-reaction control and (c) ash-layer diffusion control. The solid flow rate is 1000 kg min-1, and the solid holdup (WB) in the reactor is 20,000 kg. Assume also that the SCM is valid, and the surface reaction is first-order with respect to A. 

For gas-film mass transfer control, we use equation 22.2-16a for reaction control, we use equation 22.2-18 and for ash-layer diffusion control, we integrate equation 22.2-13 numerically in conjunction with 22.2-19, as described in Example 22-3(c). The results generated by the E-Z Solve software (file ex22-4.msp) are shown in Figure 22.4. 

B = 0.80, t, which is a measure of the size of reactor, is about 1.7 min for ash-layer control, 9.5 min for reaction control, and 14.5 min for gas-film control. The relatively favorable behavior for ash-layer diffusion control in this example reflects primarily the low value of (1.67 min versus 6.67 min for the other two cases) imposed. 

Diffusivities in liquids are comparatively low, a factor of 10 lower than in gases, so it is probable in most industrial examples that they are diffusion rate controlled. One consequence is that L-L. reactions are not as temperature sensitive as ordinary chemical reactions, although the effect of temperature rise on viscosity and droplet size sometimes can result in substantial rate increase. On the whole, in the presnt state of the art, the design of L-L reactors must depend on scale-up from laboratory or pilot plant work. 

Fig. 18b.6. (a) Shape of the voltage pulses for diffusion control, mixed diffusion-kinetic control, and kinetic control, (b) concentration gradient of O showing expansion of the diffusion layer with time for complete diffusion controlled reaction, and (c) current transients show diffusion controlled, mixed kinetics and diffusion control, and complete kinetics controlled reactions corresponding to voltage pulses shown in (a). Note that the equations are derived only for the diffusion controlled case. 

We now start examining how competing follow-up reactions control product distribution. The way in which these reactions interfere depends on their rate relative to the diffusion process, or alternatively, on the relative size of the corresponding reaction and diffusion layers (Figure 2.31). For a follow-up reaction with a first (or pseudo-first-order) rate constant, k, occurring in the framework of an EC reaction scheme (see Section 2.2.1), the reaction layer thickness is y/D/k. 

Control by Substrate Diffusion At low concentrations of H202 and when the pure kinetic conditions are fulfilled, the diffusion-reaction equations pertaining to Q and S are written... 

In an interesting analysis of the effects of reduction of dimensionality on rates of adsorption/desorption reactions (26), the bimolecular rate of 10 M- s- has been reported as the lower limit of diffusion control. Based on this value, the rates given in Table III indicate the desorption step is chemical-reaction-controlled, likely controlled by the chemical activation energy of breaking the surface complex bond. On the other hand, the coupled adsorption step is probably diffusion controlled. 

---