Reaction diffusion plus

Robert B. Anderson. Some information on mass transfer processes may be obtained from activation energies. If a reaction were moderately rapid and diffusion in the liquid phase were rate controlling, the apparent activation energy should be 1-2 kcal./mole. If reaction occurs in pores and were diffusion plus reaction controlled, the activation energy should be one-half that of the surface process, which should still be a large value. What apparent activation energy was found in your oxidation reactions ... 

The evolution and decomposition of metal clusters in the polysiloxanes has been quantified (49), and a diffusion-plus-reaction model for cluster growth at the surface and in the near subsurface region of a polymer film has been developed (SO). Collectively, the studies show that organometallic chemistry at the polymer/vacuum interface can have profound effects on both the dynamics of polymer chains at the surface and the evolution of low nuclearity clusters (SO, 51). 

Finally, the first-order kinetics allowed a direct display of the relative importance of the diffusion resistances on the global rate. The quantities 0.92 and 6.15 in the denominator of the previous equation measure the resistances of external diffusion and internal diffusion plus reaction. The value of rj divides the latter into internal-diffusion resistance and the resistance of the intrinsic reaction on the interior catalyst site . 

Porous catalysts are used in a variety of shapes, including spheres, cylinders, rings, irregular particles, and thin coatings on tubes or flat surfaces. Diffusion plus reaction in a flat slab is a simple case to analyze, since the area for diffusion does not change with distance from the external surface. The equation is similar to that for diffusion and reaction in a straight... 

Diffusion of reactants to the external surface is the first step in a solid-catalyzed reaction, and this is followed by simultaneous diffusion and reaction in the pores, as discussed in Chapter 4. In developing the solutions for pore diffusion plus reaction, the surface concentrations of reactants and products are assumed to be known, and in many cases these concentrations are essentially the same as in the bulk fluid. However, for fast reactions, the concentration driving force for external mass transfer may become an appreciable fraction of the bulk concentration, and both external and internal diffusion must be allowed for. There may also be temperature differences to consider these will be discussed later. Typical concentration profiles near and in a catalyst particle are depicted in Figure 5.6. As a simplification, a linear concentration gradient is shown in the boundary layer, though the actual concentration profile is generally curved. 

The rate of diffusion plus reaction in the porous catalyst is proportional to m, the effectiveness factor r], and the surface concentration C ... 

The reciprocal plot separates the catalyst resistance from the overall resistance, but it does not show the relative importance of external mass transfer and internal diffusion plus reaction. If the average particle size is known, a. ... 

Other researchers used flow between two parallel plates as the experimental and theoretical system to incorporate diffusion plus convection into their dissolution modeling and avoid film model approximations [10]. Though they did not consider adding reactions to their model, these workers did show that convection was an important phenomenon to consider in the mass transfer process associated with solid dissolution. In fact, the dissolution rate was found to correlate with flow as... 

The solid-catalyzed reaction of a gas with a liquid can be carried out in a slurry reactor, where fine catalyst particles are suspended in the liquid, or in a fixed bed of catalyst pellets, where gas and liquid flow continuously through the bed. For both types, there are several mass transfer steps to consider in modeling the reactor, since the gas dissolves and diffuses into the liquid and then both reactants diffuse to the catalyst and into the pores. The models are therefore more complex than those given in Chapter 7 for gas absorption plus reaction in a liquid. 

The authors analysis (38) uses film theory on the gas-side and penetration theory on the liquid side. The penetration theory was adopted as offering a more realistic basis to describe the diffusion and reaction. The set of parabolic partial differential equations which describe this diffusion and reaction were solved in conjunction with the customary boundary conditions, plus a number of subsidiary relationships which ensure electrical neutrality and are compatible with the initial loadings of reagent amine. Equilibrium was assumed to be established in the bulk, but otherwise the fluxes were not jointed to the overall material balances on the gas and liquid phases. Even so, the computation appears quite formidable. 

MOLECULAR DIFFUSION PLUS CONVECTION AND CHEMICAL REACTION... 

Sec. 7.5 Molecular Diffusion Plus Convection and Chemical Reaction... 

Since the reaction is instantaneous, = 0, because no A can exist next to the catalyst surface. Equation (7.5-23) describes the overall rate of the process of diffusion plus instantaneous chemical reaction. 

Figure 7.5-2. Diffusion of A and heterogeneous reaction at a surface. Sec. 7.5 Molecular Diffusion Plus Convection and Chemical Reaction...

Heating is used to alloy the deposited material with the substrate surface. Post-deposition diffusion and reaction can form a more extensive interfacial region and induce compound formation in semiconductor metallization (Figure 9.3). Post-deposition heating and diffusion can be used to completely convert the deposited material to interfacial material. For example, a platinum film on silicon can be heated to form a platinum silicide layer. The diffusion at the interface can be studied by the motion of markers. Post-deposition interdiffusion can result in the failure of a metallized semiconductor device by diffusion and shorting of the junctions. Diffusion can be hmited by using diffusion barriers. Heating plus isostatic pressure may be used to remove voids in semiconductor metallization. 

One must understand the physical mechanisms by which mass transfer takes place in catalyst pores to comprehend the development of mathematical models that can be used in engineering design calculations to estimate what fraction of the catalyst surface is effective in promoting reaction. There are several factors that complicate efforts to analyze mass transfer within such systems. They include the facts that (1) the pore geometry is extremely complex, and not subject to realistic modeling in terms of a small number of parameters, and that (2) different molecular phenomena are responsible for the mass transfer. Consequently, it is often useful to characterize the mass transfer process in terms of an effective diffusivity, i.e., a transport coefficient that pertains to a porous material in which the calculations are based on total area (void plus solid) normal to the direction of transport. For example, in a spherical catalyst pellet, the appropriate area to use in characterizing diffusion in the radial direction is 47ir2. 

An important question concerning energy trapping is whether its kinetics are limited substantially by (a) exciton diffusion from the antenna to RCs or (b) electron transfer reactions which occur within the RC itself. The former is known as the diffusion limited model while the latter is trap limited. For many years PSII was considered to be diffusion limited, due mainly to the extensive kinetic modelling studies of Butler and coworkers [232,233] in which this hypothesis was assumed. More recently this point of view has been strongly contested by Holzwarth and coworkers [230,234,235] who have convincingly analyzed the main open RC PSII fluorescence decay components (200-300 ps, 500-600 ps for PSII with outer plus inner antenna) in terms of exciton dynamics within a system of first order rate processes. A similar analysis has also been presented to explain the two PSII photovoltage rise components (300 ps, 500 ps)... 

Schematic illustration of the interrelationships between glutamate and NO in synaptic function in the cetebellum. The presynaptic nerve terminal synthesizes, stores, and releases glutamate (G) as the neurotransmitter by exocytosis as illustrated. The glutamate diffu.ses across the synaptic cleft and interacts with postsynaptic NMDA recepti>rs ( ) that are coupled to calcium (Ca ) channels. Ca influx occurs and the free intracellular Ca complexes with calmtxlulin and activates NO synthase. NADPH is also required hir conversion, and the products of the reaction are NO plus L-citrulline. NO diffuses out of the piistsynaptic cell to interact with nearby target cells, one of which is the presynaptic neuron that released the glutamate in the first place. NO stimulates cytosolic guanylate cyclase and cyclic GMP (cGMP) formation presynaptically, hut the consequence of this pre.synaptic modification is unknown.

Generate If at the working electrode (the anode) by passing a known current for a known time through the cell in Figure 17-9. The cell contains 30 mL of 1 M acetate buffer (pH 3.7) plus 0.1 M KI. The reaction in the cathode compartment is reduction of HzO to H2 + OH-. The frit retards diffusion of OH into the main compartment, where it would react with If to give IO. ... 

---