Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusion experimental setup

Schematic representation of the experimental setup is shown in Fig 1.1. The electrochemical system is coupled on-line to a Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (Balzers QMS 311 or QMG 112). Volatile substances diffusing through the PTFE membrane enter into a first chamber where a pressure between 10 1 and 10 2 mbar is maintained by means of a turbomolecular pump. In this chamber most of the gases entering in the MS (mainly solvent molecules) are eliminated, a minor part enters in a second chamber where the analyzer is placed. A second turbo molecular pump evacuates this chamber promptly and the pressure can be controlled by changing the aperture between both chambers. Depending on the type of detector used (see below) pressures in the range 10 4-10 5 mbar, (for Faraday Collector, FC), or 10 7-10 9 mbar (for Secondary Electrton Multiplier, SEM) may be established. Schematic representation of the experimental setup is shown in Fig 1.1. The electrochemical system is coupled on-line to a Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (Balzers QMS 311 or QMG 112). Volatile substances diffusing through the PTFE membrane enter into a first chamber where a pressure between 10 1 and 10 2 mbar is maintained by means of a turbomolecular pump. In this chamber most of the gases entering in the MS (mainly solvent molecules) are eliminated, a minor part enters in a second chamber where the analyzer is placed. A second turbo molecular pump evacuates this chamber promptly and the pressure can be controlled by changing the aperture between both chambers. Depending on the type of detector used (see below) pressures in the range 10 4-10 5 mbar, (for Faraday Collector, FC), or 10 7-10 9 mbar (for Secondary Electrton Multiplier, SEM) may be established.
In addition to Ti and T2, which reflect the rotational motion of water, NMR can also be used to measure the translational motion of water. If an additional, relatively small (compared to B0), steady magnetic field gradient is incorporated into a pulsed NMR experimental setup, a translational diffusion coefficient (D, m2/s) can be measured (called pulsed field gradient NMR). [Pg.45]

Here keg- describes the dynamic process (e.g. the transverse relaxation rate R2, or the diffusion coefficient D) and r describes a time constant typical for the experimental setup. By use of Eq.(l) the kegf can be written as follows ... [Pg.329]

From this experimental setup, we expect detailed information how the influence of fluctuation has to be evaluated, how important it is under different diffusion conditions and how it can be taken into consideration in dispersion models. [Pg.115]

The simulation models also correctly predicted the diffusivities of hydronium and methanol in a wide range of temperature (Fig. 19). Methanol is a neutral species and weakly interacts with Nation backbone. It is not surprising that the present MD models that do not consider chemical interaction between the molecules can still correctly evaluate the diffusivity of methanol. Because the present experimental setup is limited for liquid samples, whether or not the permeability of diffusivity is strongly depends on water content has not been examined. In summary, this work provided benchmark for the atomistic simulation of the transport processes in Nation at water content above 3 although at some points, the errors can be 100%. [Pg.369]

This equipment can be used for the study of a single-component diffusion, and the measurement of the corresponding Fickean diffusion coefficient made using a solution of Fick s second law for a geometry appropriate for the experimental setup [87-92], In this case, the flow rates were adjusted to get the desired partial pressure (6.7 Pa, P/Pn = 0.006) [90],... [Pg.264]

Some of the results of BFM experiments by Waldmann and Schmitt [11] cannot be explained with the DGM. These experiments are similar to the classic experiments by Kramers and Kistemaker [12] on gas counter-diffusion in a capillary, but Waldmann and Schmitt conducted experiments for a broader range of gas pairs. The experimental setup is shown schematically in Figure 9.10. It basically consists of two chambers of 64.2... [Pg.212]

To summarize, the type 1 equipment, in which the spectroscopic detection is combined with an electrochemical flow cell, has the advantage that the experimental setup is relatively simple. The lower limit of the time window is ca. 5 s, with the major drawback that only relatively stable intermediates can be detected. On the other hand, this ensures that homogeneous conditions are always attained. If the lifetime of the intermediates is less than 1 s, they exist in a reaction layer within the diffusion... [Pg.557]

Diffusion, adsorption, and surface reaction are closely interconnected in heterogeneous catalysis characterization studies. Chromatographic separation is a physicochemical process based also on diffusion, adsorption, as well as liquid dissolution. Based on the broadening factors embraced by the van Deemter equation, precise and accurate physicochemical measurements have been made by GC, using relatively low-cost instmmentation and a very simple experimental setup. [Pg.312]

Fig. 1 Experimental setup used from RF-GC for the characterization of solid catalysts (a) under steady-state conditions, with catalyst bed being put at a short length of sampling column /, near the junction of diffusion and sampling columns (b) under non-steady-state conditions, with catalytic bed being put at the top of diffusion column L. Fig. 1 Experimental setup used from RF-GC for the characterization of solid catalysts (a) under steady-state conditions, with catalyst bed being put at a short length of sampling column /, near the junction of diffusion and sampling columns (b) under non-steady-state conditions, with catalytic bed being put at the top of diffusion column L.
This method is also referred to as the miscible-displacement or continuous-flow method. In this method a thin disk of dispersed solid phase is deposited on a porous membrane and placed in a holder. A pump is used to maintain a constant flow velocity of solution through the thin disk and a fraction collector is used to collect effluent aliquots. A diagram of the basic experimental setup is shown in Fig. 2-6. A thin disk is used in an attempt to minimize diffusion resistances in the solid phase. Disk thickness, disk hydraulic conductivity, and membrane permeability determine the range of flow velocities that are achievable. Dispersion of the solid phase is necessary so that the transit time for a solute molecule is the same at all points in the disk. However, the presence of varying particle sizes and hence pore sizes may produce nonuniform solute transit times (Skopp and McCallister, 1986). This is more likely to occur with whole soils than with clay-sized particles of soil constituents. Typically, 1- or 2-g samples are used in kinetic studies on soils with the thin disk method, but disk thicknesses have not been measured. In their study of the kinetics of phosphate and silicate retention by goethite, Miller et al. (1989) estimated the thickness of the goethite disk to be 80 /xm. [Pg.36]

Figure 9. Scheme of overall experimental setup for range-gated imaging through diffuse... [Pg.248]

An understanding of the operation of the SECM and an appreciation of the quantitative aspects of measurements with this instrument depends upon an understanding of electrochemistry at small electrodes. The behavior of ultramicroelectrodes in bulk solution (far from a substrate) has been the subject of a number of reviews (17-21). A simplified experimental setup for an electrochemical experiment is shown in Figure 1. The solution contains a species, O, at a concentration, c, and usually contains supporting electrolyte to decrease the solution resistance and insure that transport of O to the electrode occurs predominantly by diffusion. The electrochemical cell also contains an auxiliary electrode that completes the circuit via the power supply. As the power supply voltage is increased, a reduction reaction, O + ne — R, occurs at the tip, resulting in a current flow. An oxidation reaction will occur at the auxiliary electrode, but this reaction is usually not of interest in SECM, since this electrode is placed sufficiently far from the UME... [Pg.2]

The experimental setup is essentially identical to that described in Sec. III.A and Figure 13. The synthetic membrane in the diffusion cell is replaced with a section of excised skin tissue. The donor compartment contains a redox-active species that is transported across the tissue due to the concentration gradient or an applied current. The two large Ag/AgCl electrodes and a galvanostat are used to drive the iontophoretic current across the skin. [Pg.389]


See other pages where Diffusion experimental setup is mentioned: [Pg.479]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.798]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.4733]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.764]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.1223]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.4732]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.42 ]




SEARCH



Experimental diffusion

Experimental setups

Setup

© 2024 chempedia.info