Diffusion effects within catalyst particle

For a completely realistic interpretation of diffusion effects within catalyst particles, a heterogeneous reactor model is required. In a heterogeneous model, separate balance... 

For liquid-phase catalytic or enzymatic reactions, catalysts or enzymes are used as homogeneous solutes in the hquid, or as sohd particles suspended in the hquid phase. In the latter case, (i) the particles per se may be catalysts (ii) the catalysts or enzymes are uniformly distributed within inert particles or (hi) the catalysts or enzymes exist at the surface of pores, inside the particles. In such heterogeneous catalytic or enzymatic systems, a variety of factors that include the mass transfer of reactants and products, heat effects accompanying the reactions, and/or some surface phenomena, may affect the apparent reaction rates. For example, in situation (iii) above, the reactants must move to the catalytic reaction sites within catalyst particles by various mechanisms of diffusion through the pores. In general, the apparent rates of reactions with catalyst or enzymatic particles are lower than the intrinsic reaction rates this is due to the various mass transfer resistances, as is discussed below. 

Another type of stability problem arises in reactors containing reactive solid or catalyst particles. During chemical reaction the particles themselves pass through various states of thermal equilibrium, and regions of instability will exist along the reactor bed. Consider, for example, a first-order catalytic reaction in an adiabatic tubular reactor and further suppose that the reactor operates in a region where there is no diffusion limitation within the particles. The steady state condition for reaction in the particle may then be expressed by equating the rate of chemical reaction to the rate of mass transfer. The rate of chemical reaction per unit reactor volume will be (1 - e)kCAi since the effectiveness factor rj is considered to be unity. From equation 3.66 the rate of mass transfer per unit volume is (1 - e) (Sx/Vp)hD(CAG CAl) so the steady state condition is ... 

Catalyst supports such as silica and alumina have low thermal conductivities so that temperature gradients within catalyst particles are likely in all but the finely ground powders used for infrinsic kinetic studies. There may also be a film resisfance fo heaf fransfer af fhe exfemal surface of the catalyst. Thus the internal temperatures in a catalyst pellet may be substantially different than the bulk gas temperature. The definition of the effectiveness factor, Equation 10.23, is unchanged, but an exothermic reaction can have reaction rates inside the pellet that are higher than would be predicted using the bulk gas temperature. In the absence of a diffusion limitation, rj > 1 would be expected for an exothermic reaction. (The case > 1 is also possible for some isothermal reactions with weird kinetics.) Mass transfer limitations may have a larger... 

CBb molar concentration of liquid phase component B, mol m-3 Deff effective diffusivity within catalyst particle, m2 s l Dj liquid-phase diffusivity, m2 s 1 E enhancement factor for gas-liquid reaction... 

In may be noted that a level [I] reactor selection can be done even with the effective reaction rate expressions (Equations 6.3 and 6.4). For instance, one should always attempt to select a reactor that helps to quicken the otherwise slowest step in the effective rate. For instance, if internal diffusion within catalyst particles is the limiting step, then one has to use fine particles in a slurry bubble column. If liquid-solid mass transfer is... 

The concentration of gas over the active catalyst surface at location / in a pore is ai [). The pore diffusion model of Section 10.4.1 linked concentrations within the pore to the concentration at the pore mouth, a. The film resistance between the external surface of the catalyst (i.e., at the mouths of the pore) and the concentration in the bulk gas phase is frequently small. Thus, a, and the effectiveness factor depends only on diffusion within the particle. However, situations exist where the film resistance also makes a contribution to rj so that Steps 2 and 8 must be considered. This contribution can be determined using the principle of equal rates i.e., the overall reaction rate equals the rate of mass transfer across the stagnant film at the external surface of the particle. Assume A is consumed by a first-order reaction. The results of the previous section give the overall reaction rate as a function of the concentration at the external surface, a. ... 

This study was carried out to simulate the 3D temperature field in and around the large steam reforming catalyst particles at the wall of a reformer tube, under various conditions (Dixon et al., 2003). We wanted to use this study with spherical catalyst particles to find an approach to incorporate thermal effects into the pellets, within reasonable constraints of computational effort and realism. This was our first look at the problem of bringing together CFD and heterogeneously catalyzed reactions. To have included species transport in the particles would have required a 3D diffusion-reaction model for each particle to be included in the flow simulation. The computational burden of this approach would have been very large. For the purposes of this first study, therefore, species transport was not incorporated in the model, and diffusion and mass transfer limitations were not directly represented. 

As mentioned earlier, if the rate of a catalytic reaction is proportional to the surface area, then a catalyst with the highest possible area is most desirable and that is generally achieved by its porous structure. However, the reactants have to diffuse into the pores within the catalyst particle, and as a result a concentration gradient appears between the pore mouth and the interior of the catalyst. Consequently, the concentration at the exterior surface of the catalyst particle does not apply to die whole surface area and the pore diffusion limits the overall rate of reaction. The effectiveness factor tjs is used to account for diffusion and reaction in porous catalysts and is defined as... 

In Figure 7.4 the effectiveness factor is plotted against the Thiele modulus for spherical catalyst particles. For low values of 0, Ef is almost equal to unity, with reactant transfer within the catalyst particles having little effect on the apparent reaction rate. On the other hand, Ef decreases in inverse proportion to 0 for higher values of 0, with reactant diffusion rates limiting the apparent reaction rate. Thus, decreases with increasing reaction rates and the radius of catalyst spheres, and with decreasing effective diffusion coefficients of reactants within the catalyst spheres. 

Diffusion within the catalyst particle can be accounted for by using an effectiveness factor, tj, but x should no longer be defined to make k(x) linear in x. Rather, it would be sensible to make tjk linear in x. Of course, straightening out the monotone dependence on x of one parameter, distorts the distribution, as in equation (4), and it may be better to think of the Damkohler number as a function of x. We can alway write it as Da.u>(x), where a>(x) has a mean value of 1. 

Thiele(I4>, who predicted how in-pore diffusion would influence chemical reaction rates, employed a geometric model with isotropic properties. Both the effective diffusivity and the effective thermal conductivity are independent of position for such a model. Although idealised geometric shapes are used to depict the situation within a particle such models, as we shall see later, are quite good approximations to practical catalyst pellets. 

The support has an internal pore structure (i.e., pore volume and pore size distribution) that facilitates transport of reactants (products) into (out of) the particle. Low pore volume and small pores limit the accessibility of the internal surface because of increased diffusion resistance. Diffusion of products outward also is decreased, and this may cause product degradation or catalyst fouling within the catalyst particle. As discussed in Sec. 7, the effectiveness factor Tj is the ratio of the actual reaction rate to the rate in the absence of any diffusion limitations. When the rate of reaction greatly exceeds the rate of diffusion, the effectiveness factor is low and the internal volume of the catalyst pellet is not utilized for catalysis. In such cases, expensive catalytic metals are best placed as a shell around the pellet. The rate of diffusion may be increased by optimizing the pore structure to provide larger pores (or macropores) that transport the reactants (products) into (out of) the pellet and smaller pores (micropores) that provide the internal surface area needed for effective catalyst dispersion. Micropores typically have volume-averaged diameters of 50 to... 

---