Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Diffusion drops

Figure 19.8 Diffusivity D and concentration C at wall boundary, (a) Schematic view of a wall boundary. Diffusivity drops abruptly from a very large value DB, which guarantees complete mixing in system B, to the much smaller value Da. The concentration penetrates into system A when time t grows. X(/2( Figure 19.8 Diffusivity D and concentration C at wall boundary, (a) Schematic view of a wall boundary. Diffusivity drops abruptly from a very large value DB, which guarantees complete mixing in system B, to the much smaller value Da. The concentration penetrates into system A when time t grows. X(/2(<i) is the half-concentration depth (Eq. 18-23) as a function of time. (b) In reality the change of D from the well-mixed system B into the diffusive system A is smooth (see text). Yet, the concentration profile in system A is well approximated by the idealized case shown in (a).
In the preceding section, the sediment surface was described as an intermedia wall boundary. Thereby we tacitly assumed that the diffusion wall, that is, the location where diffusivity drops from DB, to DA coincides with the interface between the two media. As shown in Fig. 19.86, the transition from a turbulent to a stagnant media includes a boundary layer in the former in which diffusivity drops in a characteristic manner. [Pg.854]

The growth of bubbles is controlled by the rates at which volatiles in the melt can diffuse towards the bubbles, and the opposing viscous forces. Near a bubble, volatiles are depleted such that melt viscosity increases dramatically, and diffusivities drop, making it harder for volatiles to diffuse through and grow the bubble. These opposing factors are described by the nondimensional Peclet number (Pe), which is the ratio of the characteristic timescales of volatile diffusion (T(1 = r lD, where r is the bubble radius and D the diffusion coefficient of the volatile in the melt) and of viscous relaxation (t = 17/AP where 17 is the melt dynamic viscosity and AP the oversaturation pressure, i.e., Pe = Dingwell... [Pg.1396]

Gas-phase diffusion, drop internally well-mixed, constant concentration at large distances from the drop D, H, r, 105 pwRaTr 3 > H Mg See Fig. 8-10, Hales (1972) curves 3, 4, 5... [Pg.402]

For several reasons the reliable measurement of micropore-diffusion has proved to be far more difficult than expected. A wide range of different experimental techniques have been applied (see Table 3). We now know that when the diameter of the diffusing molecule is even slightly smaller than the pore diameter, diffusion within an ideal micropore is surprisingly fast and difficult to measure by macroscopic methods since the size of available zeolite crystals is limited. Such fast processes can, however, be measured relatively easily by PFG NMR and QENS. As the molecular diameter of the sorbate approaches (or even exceeds) the minimum diameter of the pore the diffusional activation energy increases and the diffusivity drops by orders of magnitude. Slow transport-diffusion (for example ethane, propane, etc. in CHA or Zeolite A - see Fig. 7) is easily measured macroscopically but inaccessible to microscopic techniques. The range of systems and experimental conditions where reliable measurements can be made by both macroscopic and microscopic methods is therefore quite restricted. [Pg.22]

The change in vacancy concentration as a function of dopant density has a direct effect on the diffusivity of that dopant. [2] For low dopant concentrations the diffusivity of the dopant increases as the vacancy concentration increases if the dopant diffuses via a vacancy mechanism, as most do. This effect may be detectable even if the vacancy concentration is too small to have a measurable impact on doping. The charge on a vacancy can also have a significant effect. If the vacancy concentration gets too high, then defect clusters form and the diffusivity drops abruptly. To see how this can work in detail, we will consider the cases of As and P diffusivities in Si. [Pg.308]

Similarly to the response at hydrodynamic electrodes, linear and cyclic potential sweeps for simple electrode reactions will yield steady-state voltammograms with forward and reverse scans retracing one another, provided the scan rate is slow enough to maintain the steady state [28, 35, 36, 37 and 38]. The limiting current will be detemiined by the slowest step in the overall process, but if the kinetics are fast, then the current will be under diffusion control and hence obey the above equation for a disc. The slope of the wave in the absence of IR drop will, once again, depend on the degree of reversibility of the electrode process. [Pg.1940]

For an actual determination, first place in J some stable liquid the boiling-point of which is at least 50 above that of the organic liquid the pour density of which is to be measured. This difference in boiling-point is important, because it is essential that the organic liquid, when nbsequently dropped into the bottom of T, should volatilise rapidly nd so push out an equivalent volume of air before the organic vapour can diffuse up the tube T and possibly condense in the cooler ttppcr portion of the tube. Suitable liquids for use in the jacket are ter, chlorobenzene (132°), rym-tetrachloro-ethane (147 ), P ... [Pg.425]

The surfactant is initially distributed through three different locations dissolved as individual molecules or ions in the aqueous phase, at the surface of the monomer drops, and as micelles. The latter category holds most of the surfactant. Likewise, the monomer is located in three places. Some monomer is present as individual molecules dissolved in the water. Some monomer diffuses into the oily interior of the micelle, where its concentration is much greater than in the aqueous phase. This process is called solubilization. The third site of monomer is in the dispersed droplets themselves. Most of the monomer is located in the latter, since these drops are much larger, although far less abundant, than the micelles. Figure 6.10 is a schematic illustration of this state of affairs during emulsion polymerization. [Pg.399]

The function of aeration in a wastewater treatment system is to maintain an aerobic condition. Water, upon exposure to air, tends to estabUsh an equihbrium concentration of dissolved oxygen (DO). Oxygen absorption is controlled by gas solubiUty and diffusion at the gas—hquid interface. Mechanical or artificial aeration may be utilised to speed up this process. Agitating the water, creating drops or a thin layer, or bubbling air through water speeds up absorption because each increases the surface area at the interface. [Pg.339]

Deep Bed Filters. Deep bed filtration is fundamentally different from cake filtration both in principle and appHcation. The filter medium (Fig. 4) is a deep bed with pore size much greater than the particles it is meant to remove. No cake should form on the face of the medium. Particles penetrate into the medium where they separate due to gravity settling, diffusion, and inertial forces attachment to the medium is due to molecular and electrostatic forces. Sand is the most common medium and multimedia filters also use garnet and anthracite. The filtration process is cycHc, ie, when the bed is full of sohds and the pressure drop across the bed is excessive, the flow is intermpted and solids are backwashed from the bed, sometimes aided by air scouring or wash jets. [Pg.387]

Flow Nozzles. A flow nozzle is a constriction having an eUiptical or nearly eUiptical inlet section that blends into a cylindrical throat section as shown in Figure 8. Nozzle pressure differential is normally measured between taps located 1 pipe diameter upstream and 0.5 pipe diameters downstream of the nozzle inlet face. A nozzle has the approximate discharge coefficient of an equivalent venturi and the pressure drop of an equivalent orifice plate although venturi nozzles, which add a diffuser cone to proprietary nozzle shapes, are available to provide better pressure recovery. [Pg.60]

Where surface-active agents are present, the notion of surface tension and the description of the phenomena become more complex. As fluid flows past a circulating drop (bubble), fresh surface is created continuously at the nose of the drop. This fresh surface can have a different concentration of agent, hence a different surface tension, from the surface further downstream that was created earlier. Neither of these values need equal the surface tension developed in a static, equiUbrium situation. A proper description of the flow under these circumstances involves additional dimensionless groups related to the concentrations and diffusivities of the surface-active agents. [Pg.92]


See other pages where Diffusion drops is mentioned: [Pg.543]    [Pg.907]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.1433]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.1009]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.543]    [Pg.907]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.1433]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.1009]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.524]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.2677]    [Pg.2888]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.459]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.58]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.235 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info