Diffusion concentration profile

It is useful to point out here that we frequently encounter partial steady-states. An important example is the case where the diffusion process is much faster than a surface process, and thus a quasi-steady-state is reached for the diffusion concentration profile at each changing concentration of the surface. This distinction between different timescales of the processes can lead to a significant simplification of complex problems, see end of Section 4.3 or Chapter 4 in this volume. 

Fig. 7.35. Development of diffusion concentration profiles in ensembles of microelectrodes. Concentration distortions at very short times during chronoamperometry or fast sweep rates during (a) cyclic voltammetry, (b) intermediate times or sweep rates, and (c) long times or slow sweep rates. Voltam-metric responses are shown schematically. (Reprinted from B. R. Scharifker, Microelectrode Techniques in Electrochemistry, in Modem Aspects of Electrochemistry, Vd. 22, J. O M. Bockris, B. E. Conway, and R. E. White, eds., Plenum, 1992, p. 505.)...

Probably, thermal ion exchange can be responsible for the observed diffusion concentration profile nevertheless, more studies are required to reveal possible causes of such phenomenon. 

For an array of isolated disc ultramicroelectrodes the diffusion-concentration profiles develop in time in a characteristic way [43]. At very short time interval, the diffusion is linear. During the extended time of electrolysis the contribution of the radial diffusion is increased and a sigmoidal voltammogram characteristic for the steady state appears. Finally, after long-time experiment the individual diffusion layers overlap and linear diffusion becomes dominant again. 

The Au was found to diffuse via a complex mechanism involving a vacancy-controlled interstitial-substitutional equilibrium. This led to very complex diffusion concentration profiles. The experimental data on the self-diffusion coefficient of Si was described by ... 

Probably, the main complication of this type of experiment is that the diffusion concentration profile cannot be kept unperturbed during the whole time frame of the measurement, which may be more than a minute. Even using an efficient vibration isolation table, it is very difficult to prevent natural convective processes (3). Another detail to take into account for the interpretation of SG/TC results is the effect that an amperometric tip may have on the concentration profile of the substrate, which is more important for small tip-substrate distances (49). 

Most of the counterions form a diffuse concentration profile away from the particle surface. There are two models that describe this diffusive layer. In the diffusive double-layer model, the concentration of this diffuse region of counterions decreases gradually away from the surface (Figure 13.2a) (Hamley 2000). In the Stern model, the interface between the inner region of the counterion environment is a sharp plane (Stern plane) and the inner region consists of a single layer of counterions called the Stern layer (Figure 13.2b) (Hamley 2000). 

The scan rate, u = EIAt, plays a very important role in sweep voltannnetry as it defines the time scale of the experiment and is typically in the range 5 mV s to 100 V s for nonnal macroelectrodes, although sweep rates of 10 V s are possible with microelectrodes (see later). The short time scales in which the experiments are carried out are the cause for the prevalence of non-steady-state diflfiision and the peak-shaped response. Wlien the scan rate is slow enough to maintain steady-state diflfiision, the concentration profiles with time are linear within the Nemst diflfiision layer which is fixed by natural convection, and the current-potential response reaches a plateau steady-state current. On reducing the time scale, the diflfiision layer caimot relax to its equilibrium state, the diffusion layer is thiimer and hence the currents in the non-steady-state will be higher. 

Figure C2.1.18. Schematic representation of tire time dependence of tire concentration profile of a low-molecular-weight compound sorbed into a polymer for case I and case II diffusion. In botli diagrams, tire concentration profiles are calculated using a constant time increment starting from zero. The solvent concentration at tire surface of tire polymer, x = 0, is constant.

In a solution of molecules of uniform molecular weight, all particles settle with the same value of v. If diffusion is ignored, a sharp boundary forms between the top portion of the cell, which has been swept free of solute, and the bottom, which still contains solute. Figure 9.13a shows schematically how the concentration profile varies with time under these conditions. It is apparent that the Schlieren optical system described in the last section is ideally suited for measuring the displacement of this boundary with time. Since the velocity of the boundary and that of the particles are the same, the sedimentation coefficient is readily measured. 

Film Theory. Many theories have been put forth to explain and correlate experimentally measured mass transfer coefficients. The classical model has been the film theory (13,26) that proposes to approximate the real situation at the interface by hypothetical "effective" gas and Hquid films. The fluid is assumed to be essentially stagnant within these effective films making a sharp change to totally turbulent flow where the film is in contact with the bulk of the fluid. As a result, mass is transferred through the effective films only by steady-state molecular diffusion and it is possible to compute the concentration profile through the films by integrating Fick s law ... 

Equimolar Counterdiffusion in Binary Cases. If the flux of A is balanced by an equal flux of B in the opposite direction (frequently encountered in binary distillation columns), there is no net flow through the film and like is directly given by Fick s law. In an ideal gas, where the diffusivity can be shown to be independent of concentration, integration of Fick s law leads to a linear concentration profile through the film and to the following expression where (P/RT)y is substituted for... 

Fig. 6. Concentration profiles through an idealized biporous adsorbent particle showing some of the possible regimes. (1) + (a) rapid mass transfer, equihbrium throughout particle (1) + (b) micropore diffusion control with no significant macropore or external resistance (1) + (c) controlling resistance at the surface of the microparticles (2) + (a) macropore diffusion control with some external resistance and no resistance within the microparticle (2) + (b) all three resistances (micropore, macropore, and film) significant (2) + (c) diffusional resistance within the macroparticle and resistance at the surface of the...

Although molecular diffusion itself is very slow, its effect is nearly always enhanced by turbulent eddies and convection currents. These provide almost perfect mixing in the bulk of each Hquid phase, but the effect is damped out in the vicinity of the interface. Thus the concentration profiles at each... 

The equations of combiaed diffusion and reaction, and their solutions, are analogous to those for gas absorption (qv) (47). It has been shown how the concentration profiles and rate-controlling steps change as the rate constant iacreases (48). When the reaction is very slow and the B-rich phase is essentially saturated with C, the mass-transfer rate is governed by the kinetics within the bulk of the B-rich phase. This is defined as regime 1. 

Volt mmetiy. Diffusional effects, as embodied in equation 1, can be avoided by simply stirring the solution or rotating the electrode, eg, using the rotating disk electrode (RDE) at high rpm (3,7). The resultant concentration profiles then appear as shown in Figure 5. A time-independent Nernst diffusion layer having a thickness dictated by the laws of hydrodynamics is estabUshed. For the RDE,... 

The concentration profile is steeper for the MacCormack method than for the upstream derivatives, but oscillations can still be present. The flux-corrected transport method can be added to the MacCormack method. A solution is obtained both with the upstream algorithm and the MacCormack method and then they are combinea to add just enough diffusion to ehminate the oscillations without smoothing the solution too much. The algorithm is comphcated and lengthy but well worth the effort (Refs. 37, 107, and 270). 

Figure 16-27 compares the various constant pattern solutions for R = 0.5. The curves are of a similar shape. The solution for reaction kinetics is perfectly symmetrical. The cui ves for the axial dispersion fluid-phase concentration profile and the linear driving force approximation are identical except that the latter occurs one transfer unit further down the bed. The cui ve for external mass transfer is exactly that for the linear driving force approximation turned upside down [i.e., rotated 180° about cf= nf = 0.5, N — Ti) = 0]. The hnear driving force approximation provides a good approximation for both pore diffusion and surface diffusion. 

FIG. 16 36 Dimensionless time-distance plot for the displacement chromatography of a binary mixture. The darker lines indicate self-sharpening boundaries and the thinner lines diffuse boundaries. Circled numerals indicate the root number. Concentration profiles are shown at intermediate dimensionless column lengths = 0.43 and = 0.765. The profiles remain unchanged for longer column lengths. 

FIG. 25-18 Biophysical model for the hiolayer. Cg is the concentration in the gas phase. The two concentration profiles shown in the hiolayer (C ) refer to (1) elimination reaction rate limited, and (2) diffusion hmited. (SOURCE Redrawn from Ref. 26.)... 

Interdiffusion of bilayered thin films also can be measured with XRD. The diffraction pattern initially consists of two peaks from the pure layers and after annealing, the diffracted intensity between these peaks grows because of interdiffusion of the layers. An analysis of this intensity yields the concentration profile, which enables a calculation of diffusion coefficients, and diffusion coefficients cm /s are readily measured. With the use of multilayered specimens, extremely small diffusion coefficients (-10 cm /s) can be measured with XRD. Alternative methods of measuring concentration profiles and diffusion coefficients include depth profiling (which suffers from artifacts), RBS (which can not resolve adjacent elements in the periodic table), and radiotracer methods (which are difficult). For XRD (except for multilayered specimens), there must be a unique relationship between composition and the d-spacings in the initial films and any solid solutions or compounds that form this permits calculation of the compo-... 

Wool [32] has considered the fractal nature of polymer-metal and of polymer-polymer surfaces. He argues that diffusion processes often lead to fractal interfaces. Although the concentration profile varies smoothly with the dimension of depth, the interface, considered in two or three dimensions is extremely rough [72]. Theoretical predictions, supported by practical measurements, suggest that the two-dimensional profile through such a surface is a self-similar fractal, that is one which appears similar at all scales of magnification. Interfaces of this kind can occur in polymer-polymer and in polymer-metal systems. 

The ripple experiment works as follows In Fig. 6, HDH and DHD are depicted by open and filled circles where the filled circles represent the deuterium labeled portions of the molecule and the open circles are the normal (protonated) portions of the chains. Initially, the average concentration vs. depth of the labeled portions of the molecules is 0.5, as seen along the normal to the interface, unless chain-end segregation exists at / = 0. If the chains reptate, the chain ends diffuse across the interface before the chain centers. This will lead to a ripple or an excess of deuterium on the HDH side and a depletion on the DHD side of the interface as indicated in the concentration profile shown at the right in Fig. 6. However, when the molecules have diffused distances comparable to Rg, the ripple will vanish and a constant concentration profile at 0.5 will again be found. 

Fig. 6. The ripple experiment at the interface between a bilayer of HDH- and DHD-labeled polystyrene, showing the interdifussion behavior of matching chains. The protonated sections of the chain are marked by filled circles. The D concentration profiles are shown on the right. Top the initial interface at / = 0. The D concentration profile is flat, since there is 50% deuteration on each side of the interface. Middle the interface after the chain ends have diffused across (x < / g). The deuterated chains from Que side enrich the deuterated centers on the other side, vice ver.sa for the protonated sections, and the ripple in the depth profile of D results. A ripple of opposite sign occurs for the H profile. Bottom the interface when the molecules have fully diffused across. The D profile becomes flat [20,56].

Dead-end Pores Dead-end volumes cause dispersion in unsteady flow (concentration profiles ar> ing) because, as a solute-rich front passes the pore, transport oceurs by molecular diffusion into the pore. After the front has passed, this solute will diffuse back out, thus dispersing. 

The resolution of infra-red densitometry (IR-D) is on the other hand more in the region of some micrometers even with the use of IR-microscopes. The interface is also viewed from the side (Fig. 4d) and the density profile is obtained mostly between deuterated and protonated polymers. The strength of specific IR-bands is monitored during a scan across the interface to yield a concentration profile of species. While in the initial experiments on polyethylene diffusion the resolution was of the order of 60 pm [69] it has been improved e.g. in polystyrene diffusion experiments [70] to 10 pm by the application of a Fourier transform-IR-microscope. This technique is nicely suited to measure profiles on a micrometer scale as well as interdiffusion coefficients of polymers but it is far from reaching molecular resolution. 

---