Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Dielectric cavity

Other frequently used resonators are dielectric cavities and loop-gap resonators (also called split-ring resonators) [12]. A dielectric cavity contains a diamagnetic material that serves as a dielectric to raise the effective filling factor by concentratmg the B field over the volume of the sample. Hollow cylinders machmed from Ilised quartz or sapphire that host the sample along the cylindrical axis are conunonly used. [Pg.1560]

CAVj p arising from the dielectric cavity effect, and... [Pg.45]

The second explanation, based on Cardona s (1983) discussion of the local field effect, requires that the dielectric cavity have about the size of a monovacancy. [Pg.120]

Coccioli, R., Boroditsky, M., Kim, K.W., Rahmat-Samii, Y., and Yablonovitch, E., 1998, Smallest possible electromagnetic mode volume in a dielectric cavity, lEE Proc.-Optoelectron. 145(6) 391-397. [Pg.64]

Analysis of ion atmospheres around highly charged macromolecules has traditionally been performed using numerical solutions to the nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann (P-B) equation (Anderson and Record, 1980 Bai et al, 2007 Baker, 2004), in which the macromolecule is approximated as a collection of point charges embedded in a low dielectric cavity surrounded by a high-dielectric solvent. This approach utilizes the precise three-dimensional structure of the macromolecule (albeit in a static sense). We would not expect such a framework to capture subtleties, which are dependent on the partial dehydration of ions. [Pg.427]

For a random orientation, a neighboring molecule at a distance /> from the central one is situated with equal probability on a spherical shell of radius />. Therefore, the field generated by each neighbor located inside the dielectric cavity can be obtained by averaging the field given by Eq. (10b)... [Pg.600]

Chen, F. and Chipman D.M., Boundary element methods for dielectric cavity construction and integration. J. Chem.Phys. (2003) 119 10289—10297. [Pg.94]

Another model, in which the reactant is represented by a dielectric cavity with point charge in its center, has been forwarded by German und Kuznetsov [127]. It is beyond the scope of the present review to discuss all the above-mentioned improvements in detail. [Pg.242]

Other modifications of the original Marcus model have been suggested [27]. Many reactants are not spherical in shape and are better approximated as ellipsoids. In this case a much more complex expression for the effective distance R is obtained which depends on the length of the two axes which describe the shape of the ellipsoid. Another improvement in the model is to describe each reactant as a dielectric cavity with fixed charges located within it. In this case, the calculation of Gxo requires a description of the charge distribution within the reactants and an estimate of the local permittivity in the dielectric cavity. [Pg.355]

The second force component, the dielectric boundary pressure, results from the tendency of a high dielectric medium to displace a low dielectric constant medium if an electrical field is present. This force is always directed along the gradient of the dielectric constant, which means that it constitutes a pure pressure at the solute-solvent interface. The dielectric boundary pressure is the force component that balances the reaction field component of the qE force. For example, in the case of an isolated charge inside a low dielectric cavity, the dielectric boundary pressure provides the equal and opposite force to the qE force urging the charge toward the solvent. It is therefore evident that the dielectric boundary force is quantitatively as important as the reaction field force and that its neglect will lead to a violation of Newton s third law of motion. [Pg.247]

To account for the polarization effects, the enzyme surrounding to a first approximation can he considered as a homogenous polarizable medium, which can he modeled using some dielectric cavity techniques. In addition, to model the steric effects that the enzyme surrounding imposes on the active site, it has been shown to be very useful to simply fix atoms at the edge of the active site model. The combination of continuum solvation and the coordinate-locking scheme represents a quite simple but yet powerful way to account for the parts of the enzyme that are not included in the model. [Pg.720]

Attempts to distinguish inductive and field effects have been frustrated by the lack of a molecule that provides an unambiguous answer. Such a molecule would require that the low dielectric cavity of the field effect model 2 be occupied by the chemical bonds important to the inductive effect model. If a small attenuation factor is adopted for through-bond transmission of the polar effect, both models predict similar results. 2 For example, o-chlorophenylpropionic acid is weaker than expected by the inductive model 3 and is unsuitable. [Pg.76]

If the irradiation of the polymer is carried out above the Tg, the secondary electron will, after having spent its kinetic energy, be drawn back to and recombine with the parent ion or any other positive ion in the vicinity. Irradiation of the polymer in the glassy state, in contrast, will lead to a trapping of some of the secondary electrons by neutral molecules with positive electron affinity, free radicals, dielectric cavities. [Pg.228]

A typical TL glow curve can be obtained when an insulator is heated at a constant rate after being irradiated by a high-energy beam, such as UV radiation. X-rays or /-rays. The trapped electrons in the specimen are generated by the radiation. There are three different types of electron traps dielectric cavity traps, neutral molecules with a positive electron affinity and free radicals. When the excited specimen is heated, a TL glow is observed owing to the recombination of detrapped electrons [48-50]. [Pg.29]

In die quest for optimizing the modulation spectrometer one could attempt to change the intermediate frequency of the superhetrodyne receiver of our microvoltmeter (455 kHz instead of 70 kHz). One could also replace the present cavity by a dielectric cavity that will support the presence of the pickup coil better, and render automatic the process of acquisition of data. [Pg.80]


See other pages where Dielectric cavity is mentioned: [Pg.120]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.5404]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.5403]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.2170]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.256]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.256 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info