Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Device paradigm

Nanodevices are systems with nanostructured materials that carry out specific functions with either improved performance or new attributes. Recent years have witnessed the emergence of new device paradigms based on nanostructured materials, including nanoelectronic devices, nano-optoelectronic devices, spintronic devices, nanosensors, and drug and gene delivery systems. [Pg.3630]

One of the alternative approaches under the 510(k) paradigm is Special 510(k) Device Modifications. This approach utilizes certain aspects of the Quality System Regulations (Quality System Requirements for Good Manufacturing Practices). The other alternative is the Abbreviated 510(k). This approach utilizes special controls in which standards or voluntary guidelines can facilitate 510(k) review and expedite evaluation. [Pg.179]

The ideal scenario would be to have the power of a traditional IR analyzer but with the cost and simplicity of a simple filter device, or even better to reduce the size down to that of a sensor (such as the spectral detector mentioned earlier) or a simple handheld device. This is not far-fetched, and with technologies emerging from the telecommunications industry, the life science industry and even nanotechnology, there can be a transition into analyzer opportunities for the future. There is definitely room for a paradigm shift, with the understanding that if an analyzer becomes simpler and less expensive to implement then the role of analyzers/sensor can expand dramatically. With part of this comes the phrase good enough is OK - there is no need for the ultimate in versatility or sophistication. Bottom line is that even in process instrumentation, simple is beautiful. [Pg.192]

Naturally, in terms of the Copenhagen paradigm, nothing at all comes from such a device. In this model the theta waves do not even exist. [Pg.516]

The Heisenberg space defines the available uncertainty space where, in quantum mechanics, it is possible to perform, direct or indirect, measurements. Outside this space, in the forbidden region, according to the orthodox quantum paradigm, it is impossible to make any measurement prediction. We shall insist that this impossibility does not result from the fact that measuring devices are inherently imperfect and therefore modify, due to the interaction, in an unpredictable way what is supposed to be measured. This results from the fact that, prior to the measurement process, the system does not really possess this property. In this model for describing nature, it is the measurement process itself that, out of a large number of possibilities, creates the physical observable properties of a quantum system. [Pg.537]

In the last section, electron transfer between dendrimers in films was mentioned. This type of hopping is important in thin-film organic devices (see above). How do dendrimers behave in solution Are the paradigms the same Actually, they are not. [Pg.111]

Methods to electrically wire redox proteins with electrodes by the reconstitution of apo-proteins on relay-cofactor units were discussed. Similarly, the application of conductive nanoelements, such as metallic nanoparticles or carbon nanotubes, provided an effective means to communicate the redox centers of proteins with electrodes, and to electrically activate their biocatalytic functions. These fundamental paradigms for the electrical contact of redox enzymes with electrodes were used to develop amperometric sensors and biofuel cells as bioelectronic devices. [Pg.372]

These small, flexible devices open up two new monitoring paradigms (1) personal exposure and mobile monitoring and (2) measurements at a multitude of fixed sites which can also be flexibly located in living areas where current monitoring containers cannot be placed. [Pg.290]

Wada, Y. Prospects for single-molecule information-processing devices for the next paradigm. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 960, 39-61 (2002). [Pg.234]

In the world of convergence between IT and telecommunications the paradigm of mobile agents opens up a new area for their applications. It is fairly easy to create personal content and distribute it due to high availability of rich-featured interconnected mobile devices. Hence, there is a need to provide some mechanisms that prevents misusing of someone s property. [Pg.344]


See other pages where Device paradigm is mentioned: [Pg.16]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.517]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.834]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.1047]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.799]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.930]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.131]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.16 , Pg.18 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info