Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Development frontal analysis

In principle, the modes and steps in preparative chromatography do not differ from those in analytical chromatography. Four modes are used (Fig. 4) isocratic elution, linear gradient elution, stepwise elution, and displacement development. Frontal analysis is not used for purification of biomolecules, but it is used for... [Pg.296]

Modes of Operation The classical modes of operation of chromatography as enunciated by Tisehus [Kolloid Z., 105, 101 (1943)] are elution chromatography, frontal analysis, and displacement development. Basic features of these techniques are illustrated in Fig. [Pg.1530]

A chromatographic separation can be developed in three ways, by displacement development, by frontal analysis, and by elution development, the last being almost universally used in all analytical chromatography. Nevertheless, for the sake of completeness, and because in preparative chromatography (under certain conditions of mass overload) displacement effects occur to varying extents, all three development processes will be described. [Pg.7]

This type of chromatographic development will only be briefly described as it is rarely used and probably is of academic interest only. This method of development can only be effectively employed in a column distribution system. The sample is fed continuously onto the column, usually as a dilute solution in the mobile phase. This is in contrast to displacement development and elution development, where discrete samples are placed on the system and the separation is subsequently processed. Frontal analysis only separates part of the first compound in a relatively pure state, each subsequent component being mixed with those previously eluted. Consider a three component mixture, containing solutes (A), (B) and (C) as a dilute solution in the mobile phase that is fed continuously onto a column. The first component to elute, (A), will be that solute held least strongly in the stationary phase. Then the... [Pg.8]

Figure 5. The Transition from Elution Development to Frontal Analysis by Using Large Sample Volumes... Figure 5. The Transition from Elution Development to Frontal Analysis by Using Large Sample Volumes...
This is an oversimplified treatment of the concentration effect that can occur on a thin layer plate when using mixed solvents. Nevertheless, despite the complex nature of the surface that is considered, the treatment is sufficiently representative to disclose that a concentration effect does, indeed, take place. The concentration effect arises from the frontal analysis of the mobile phase which not only provides unique and complex modes of solute interaction and, thus, enhanced selectivity, but also causes the solutes to be concentrated as they pass along the TLC plate. This concentration process will oppose the dilution that results from band dispersion and thus, provides greater sensitivity to the spots close to the solvent front. This concealed concentration process, often not recognized, is another property of TLC development that helps make it so practical and generally useful and often provides unexpected sensitivities. [Pg.446]

The complex distribution system that results from the frontal analysis of a multicomponent solvent mixture on a thin layer plate makes the theoretical treatment of the TLC process exceedingly difficult. Although specific expressions for the important parameters can be obtained for a simple, particular, application, a general set of expressions that can help with all types of TLC analyses has not yet been developed. One advantage of the frontal analysis of the solvent, however, is to produce a concentration effect that improves the overall sensitivity of the technique. [Pg.453]

Two other means of separating and removing components from a column are frontal analysis and displacement development, but these are of secondary importance. In frontal analysis sample is continuously applied to the top of the column. Eventually, as the stationary phase becomes... [Pg.91]

Several variants of separation methods based on dialysis, ultrafiltration, and size exclusion chromatography have been developed that work under equilibrium conditions. Size exclusion chromatography especially has become the method of choice for binding measurements. The Hummel-Dreyer method, the vacancy peak method, and frontal analysis are variants that also apply to capillary electrophoresis. In comparison to chromatographic methods, capillary electrophoresis is faster, needs only minimal amounts of substances, and contains no stationary phase that may absorb parts of the equilibrium mixture or must be pre-equilibrated. [Pg.55]

A Shibukawa. Development of high-performance frontal analysis and application to drug-plasma protein binding study. Yakugaku Zasshi 118 554-565, 1998 (in Japanese). [Pg.182]

Tiselius, A. Developed liquid chromatography and pointed out frontal analysis, elution analysis, and displacement development. [Pg.2]

The separation of the sample components may be achieved by one of three techniques, namely, frontal analysis, displacement development, or elution development. [Pg.5]

SUMMARY. The frontal technique does not lend itself to many analytical applications because of the overlap of the bands and the requirement of a large amount of sample. However, it may be used to study phase equilibria (isotherms) and for preparative separations. (Many of the industrial chromatographic techniques use frontal analysis.) Displacement development has applications for analytical LC (e.g. it may be used as an initial concentrating step in GC for trace analysis). This technique may also be used in preparative work. The outstanding disadvantage of both of these techniques is that the column still contains sample at the conclusion of the separation. Thus, regeneration of the column is necessary before it can be used again. [Pg.8]

The second classification scheme is less common than the first but is found in the literature. It is based on the operating method, or the mechanism by which the sample is removed from the column, and is therefore dependent on the nature of the mobile phase. This classification, which was introduced by Tiselius21 in 1940, includes elution development, displacement development, and frontal analysis, as shown in Figure 1.2.22 In practice, only elution and to a lesser extent displacement development are commonly used. [Pg.3]

The use of the differential mode of detector operation can be extremely useful in cases where the normal chromatographic development gives very poor separations due to poor distribution kinetics between the two phases. However, the technique does require significantly more sample for frontal analysis than for normal elution development so that sufficient sample must be available. Furthermore, the response of the detector operated in the differential mode is nearly two orders of magnitude less than that when used in the normal mode and so adequate detector sensitivity must be available. [Pg.457]

L. Hagdahl, Acta Chem. Scand, 2, 574 (1948). The definition of the diagrams of the chromatograms, by frontal analysis and displacement development, was improved markedly by the ii.se of a series of three small columns connected to a micro-mixer (a capillary filled wdth quartz sand) which led directly to the cuvette for the interferometric readings. [Pg.59]

Nonlinearity of the Langmuir adsorption isotherms is observed even in noncompetitive chromatographic processes. Individual adsorption isotherms can be found experimentally using frontal analysis at overload conditions however, the adsorption isotherms in the separation of mixtures are different because of the interference of other compounds in the mixture. In PHPLC method development, it is necessary to optimize separation conditions and column loading experimentally. [Pg.1260]

The accurate determination of the adsorption isotherm parameters of the two enantiomers on a CSP is of fundamental importance to do computer-assisted optimization to scale up the process. Such determinations are usually done with an analytical column and the most traditional method to determine the parameters and saturation capacity is by frontal analysis (see section 3.4.2). The aim of paper III was to investigate the adsorption behavior and the chiral capacity of the newly developed Kromasil CHI-TBB column using a typical model compound. Many of the previous studies from the group have been made on low-capacity protein columns which has revealed interesting information about the separation mechanism [103, 110, 111], For this reason a column really aimed for preparative chiral separations was chosen for investigation [134], As solute the enantiomers of 2-phenylbutyric acid was chosen. [Pg.66]


See other pages where Development frontal analysis is mentioned: [Pg.17]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.1531]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.1353]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.14]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 ]




SEARCH



Frontal

Frontal analysis

Frontal development

© 2024 chempedia.info