Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Frontal development

When the plate is inspected the color intensity of the chromatogram zones must be more intense at the top surface of the layer than it is when viewed from the back of the TLC/HPTLC plate. If this is not the case the reagent must be made less polar to avoid a frontal development across the thickness of the layer. [Pg.85]

This author doubts whether these authors could have foreseen the impact of their words on the eventual development of commercial products that rely on frontal development, namely SPE. [Pg.171]

Frontal development is employed in large-scale purification applications, for example in decolorization of sugar, corn symp, for removal of oxidation products from waxes, used oils, etc. Adsorbents, such as activated charcoal, are used to adsorb the strongly adsorbing color-causing impurity, etc. One pure species, the least adsorbing one, is obtained. However, the feed concentration of the least adsorbed species can be substantial, making this technique industrially useful. [Pg.500]

We have already encountered frontal development in Figure 7.1.5(c). The breakthrough times for different fronts were provided in equation (7.1.22b) on the basis of the nondispersive equilibrium adsorption model. Here the mobile phase moving through the column is the feed solution to be separated a pure output is obtained only for the species that is least strongly adsorbed. Subsequent components of the feed appear as a step contaminated by the species which have come out earlier. [Pg.549]

Development of the Chromatogram. The term development describes the process of performing a chromatographic separation. There are several ways in which separation may be made to occur, eg, frontal, displacement, and elution chromatography. Frontal chromatography uses a large quantity of sample and is usually unsuited to analytical procedures. In displacement and elution chromatography, much smaller amounts of material are used. [Pg.105]

Modes of Operation The classical modes of operation of chromatography as enunciated by Tisehus [Kolloid Z., 105, 101 (1943)] are elution chromatography, frontal analysis, and displacement development. Basic features of these techniques are illustrated in Fig. [Pg.1530]

A chromatographic separation can be developed in three ways, by displacement development, by frontal analysis, and by elution development, the last being almost universally used in all analytical chromatography. Nevertheless, for the sake of completeness, and because in preparative chromatography (under certain conditions of mass overload) displacement effects occur to varying extents, all three development processes will be described. [Pg.7]

This type of chromatographic development will only be briefly described as it is rarely used and probably is of academic interest only. This method of development can only be effectively employed in a column distribution system. The sample is fed continuously onto the column, usually as a dilute solution in the mobile phase. This is in contrast to displacement development and elution development, where discrete samples are placed on the system and the separation is subsequently processed. Frontal analysis only separates part of the first compound in a relatively pure state, each subsequent component being mixed with those previously eluted. Consider a three component mixture, containing solutes (A), (B) and (C) as a dilute solution in the mobile phase that is fed continuously onto a column. The first component to elute, (A), will be that solute held least strongly in the stationary phase. Then the... [Pg.8]

Figure 5. The Transition from Elution Development to Frontal Analysis by Using Large Sample Volumes... Figure 5. The Transition from Elution Development to Frontal Analysis by Using Large Sample Volumes...
This is an oversimplified treatment of the concentration effect that can occur on a thin layer plate when using mixed solvents. Nevertheless, despite the complex nature of the surface that is considered, the treatment is sufficiently representative to disclose that a concentration effect does, indeed, take place. The concentration effect arises from the frontal analysis of the mobile phase which not only provides unique and complex modes of solute interaction and, thus, enhanced selectivity, but also causes the solutes to be concentrated as they pass along the TLC plate. This concentration process will oppose the dilution that results from band dispersion and thus, provides greater sensitivity to the spots close to the solvent front. This concealed concentration process, often not recognized, is another property of TLC development that helps make it so practical and generally useful and often provides unexpected sensitivities. [Pg.446]

The complex distribution system that results from the frontal analysis of a multicomponent solvent mixture on a thin layer plate makes the theoretical treatment of the TLC process exceedingly difficult. Although specific expressions for the important parameters can be obtained for a simple, particular, application, a general set of expressions that can help with all types of TLC analyses has not yet been developed. One advantage of the frontal analysis of the solvent, however, is to produce a concentration effect that improves the overall sensitivity of the technique. [Pg.453]

Another weapon system which was developed and engineered for production by the Arsenal for Southeast Asia was Beehive ammunition of varying calibers which dispense great numbers of tiny, lethal steel darts. This type of ammunition proved effective in Southeast Asia since it lends itself to use against troops in frontal mass assault as well as those entrenched behind the cover of heavy jungle brush... [Pg.750]

The consideration of the pressure drop over the monoliths containing a variety of CPSI (cells per in ) for the modeling of honeycomb reactor may be required, since Ap of the reactor strongly depends on CPSI of monolith. Eqn. (7) for the pressure drop of the honeycomb was employed to develop the reactor model describing the performance of the honeycomb fabricated in the present work [8]. and Ke indicate contraction and expansion loss coefficient at the honeycomb inlet and outlet, respectively and o is the ratio of free flow area to frontal area. [Pg.447]


See other pages where Frontal development is mentioned: [Pg.390]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.623]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.390]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.623]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.1531]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.445]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.106]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.634]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.500 ]




SEARCH



Development frontal analysis

Frontal

© 2024 chempedia.info