Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Derivative Hartree-Fock method

While the equations of the Hartree-Fock approach can he rigorously derived, we present them post hoc and give a physical description of the approximations leading to them. The Hartree-Fock method introduces an effective one-electron Hamiltonian. as in equation (47) on page 194 ... [Pg.224]

DHF (Dirac -Hartree-Fock) relativistic ah initio method DHF (derivative Hartree-Fock) a means for calculating nonlinear optical properties... [Pg.362]

All the early work was concerned with atoms, with Sir William Hartree regarded as the father of the technique. His son, Douglas R. Hartree, published the definitive book, The Calculation of Atomic Structures, in 1957, and in this he derived the atomic HF equations and described numerical algorithms for their solution. Charlotte Froese Fischer was a research student working under the guidance of D. R. Hartree, and she published her own definitive book. The Hartree—Fock Method for Atoms A Numerical Approach in 1977. The Appendix lists a number of freely available atomie structure programs. Most of these can be obtained from the Computer Physics Communications Program Library. [Pg.113]

The first two kinds of terms are called derivative integrals, they are the derivatives of integrals that are well known in molecular structure theory, and they are easy to evaluate. Terms of the third kind pose a problem, and we have to solve a set of equations called the coupled Hartree-Fock equations in order to find them. The coupled Hartree-Fock method is far from new one of the earliest papers is that of Gerratt and Mills. [Pg.240]

It is important to realize that each of the electronic-structure methods discussed above displays certain shortcomings in reproducing the correct band structure of the host crystal and consequently the positions of defect levels. Hartree-Fock methods severely overestimate the semiconductor band gap, sometimes by several electron volts (Estreicher, 1988). In semi-empirical methods, the situation is usually even worse, and the band structure may not be reliably represented (Deak and Snyder, 1987 Besson et al., 1988). Density-functional theory, on the other hand, provides a quite accurate description of the band structure, except for an underestimation of the band gap (by up to 50%). Indeed, density-functional theory predicts conduction bands and hence conduction-band-derived energy levels to be too low. This problem has been studied in great detail, and its origins are well understood (see, e.g., Hybertsen and Louie, 1986). To solve it, however, requires techniques of many-body theory and carrying out a quasi-particle calculation. Such calculational schemes are presently prohibitively complex and too computationally demanding to apply to defect calculations. [Pg.609]

For quantum chemistry, first-row transition metal complexes are perhaps the most difficult systems to treat. First, complex open-shell states and spin couplings are much more difficult to deal with than closed-shell main group compounds. Second, the Hartree—Fock method, which underlies all accurate treatments in wavefunction-based theories, is a very poor starting point and is plagued by multiple instabilities that all represent different chemical resonance structures. On the other hand, density functional theory (DFT) often provides reasonably good structures and energies at an affordable computational cost. Properties, in particular magnetic properties, derived from DFT are often of somewhat more limited accuracy but are still useful for the interpretation of experimental data. [Pg.302]

An analysis of the ESR spectrum of the dibenzothiophene radical anion46 yields the following hfs (hyperfine splitting) constants (gffuss) 5.16, 4.48, 1.46, and 0.86. The theoretical values based on HMO data for Model A2 are considerably smaller 2.84, 2.48, 1.47, and 0.27, respectively, which led the authors to make spin-density calculations by the Hartree-Fock method. Quite recently, the spin densities have been calculated for Model B (8S = 1, pcs = 0.566),466 and the following constants were obtained 5.03,3.99,0.75, and — 1.23. A study of the ESR spectrum of the radical derived from 2,8-dimethyl-dibenzothiophene permitted the assignment of the lowest hfe constant value to the proton in position 2. In contrast to the dithiins, experimental data for dibenzothiophene radicals are better reproduced by Model B. [Pg.17]

Structures of five derivatives of 13 were obtained in the solid state by X-ray diffraction analysis the experimentally determined bond lengths differed from those calculated by the Hartree-Fock method <2001AXB63>. X-ray structures determined for the dispirans 14 and 15 revealed an interesting facet. In the solid state the heterorings of... [Pg.370]

Open-shell Pseudohamiltonians.—The majority of atoms do not have valence structures which can be represented by the fully closed-shell wavefunction of equation (14), and consequently ab initio pseudopotentials cannot be derived directly from the theory outlined above. Acceptable wavefunctions for such atoms require either more than one determinant or the use of the symmetry-equivalenced or generalized Hartree-Fock method, and usually include partially filled shells. The total all-electron wavefunction may be symbolically expressed in terms of four subspaces,... [Pg.109]

In Volume 5 of this series, R. J. Bartlett and J. E Stanton authored a popular tutorial on applications of post-Hartree-Fock methods. Here in Chapter 2, Dr. T. Daniel Crawford and Professor Henry F. Schaefer III explore coupled cluster theory in great depth. Despite the depth, the treatment is brilliantly clear. Beginning with fundamental concepts of cluster expansion of the wavefunction, the authors provide the formal theory and the derivation of the coupled cluster equations. This is followed by thorough explanations of diagrammatic representations, the connection to many-bodied perturbation theory, and computer implementation of the method. Directions for future developments are laid out. [Pg.530]

Strictly speaking, an independence shown by the probability distributions derived from two states implies an absence of interaction between the systems or subsystems described by these two states however, in practice, the great success of models which combine the concept of independence with a non-negligible interaction shows that except for a relatively small correlation error, on average two systems may show an independent behaviour even if they interact rather strongly . The most obvious example of this is the Hartree-Fock method. [Pg.190]

These were determined to an accuracy of 10 eV by conversion-electron spectroscopy in the beta decay of 254mgs to 254pm a surprisingly low binding energy for the P2 3 (6pi/2 3/2 shell of 24+9 ev was found. Predicted values derived either from extrapolations of those measured in lower actinides or calculated by Hartree-Fock methods are about 20 to 60 eV higher in energy. [Pg.239]


See other pages where Derivative Hartree-Fock method is mentioned: [Pg.258]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.690]    [Pg.692]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.456]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.374]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.661]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.1182]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.90 , Pg.99 ]




SEARCH



Derivative Hartree-Fock

Derivative method

Hartree-Fock method

© 2024 chempedia.info