Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Density functional theory interactions

N -Fle [, ], Fle-F and Ne-F [Ml- Density-functional theory [ ] is currently unsuitable for the calculation of van der Waals interactions [90], but the situation could change. [Pg.200]

The optimised interlayer distance of a concentric bilayered CNT by density-functional theory treatment was calculated to be 3.39 A [23] compared with the experimental value of 3.4 A [24]. Modification of the electronic structure (especially metallic state) due to the inner tube has been examined for two kinds of models of concentric bilayered CNT, (5, 5)-(10, 10) and (9, 0)-(18, 0), in the framework of the Huckel-type treatment [25]. The stacked layer patterns considered are illustrated in Fig. 8. It has been predicted that metallic property would not change within this stacking mode due to symmetry reason, which is almost similar to the case in the interlayer interaction of two graphene sheets [26]. Moreover, in the three-dimensional graphite, the interlayer distance of which is 3.35 A [27], there is only a slight overlapping (0.03-0.04 eV) of the HO and the LU bands at the Fermi level of a sheet of graphite plane [28,29],... [Pg.47]

Slater s Xa method is now regarded as so much history, but it gave an important stepping stone towards modem density functional theory. In Chapter 12, I discussed the free-electron model of the conduction electrons in a solid. The electrons were assumed to occupy a volume of space that we identified with the dimensions of the metal under smdy, and the electrons were taken to be non-interacting. [Pg.221]

There is no systematic way in which the exchange correlation functional Vxc[F] can be systematically improved in standard HF-LCAO theory, we can improve on the model by increasing the accuracy of the basis set, doing configuration interaction or MPn calculations. What we have to do in density functional theory is to start from a model for which there is an exact solution, and this model is the uniform electron gas. Parr and Yang (1989) write... [Pg.225]

The ab initio methods used by most investigators include Hartree-Fock (FFF) and Density Functional Theory (DFT) [6, 7]. An ab initio method typically uses one of many basis sets for the solution of a particular problem. These basis sets are discussed in considerable detail in references [1] and [8]. DFT is based on the proof that the ground state electronic energy is determined completely by the electron density [9]. Thus, there is a direct relationship between electron density and the energy of a system. DFT calculations are extremely popular, as they provide reliable molecular structures and are considerably faster than FFF methods where correlation corrections (MP2) are included. Although intermolecular interactions in ion-pairs are dominated by dispersion interactions, DFT (B3LYP) theory lacks this term [10-14]. FFowever, DFT theory is quite successful in representing molecular structure, which is usually a primary concern. [Pg.153]

The precursor of such atomistic studies is a description of atomic interactions or, generally, knowledge of the dependence of the total energy of the system on the positions of the atoms. In principle, this is available in ab-initio total energy calculations based on the loc density functional theory (see, for example, Pettifor and Cottrell 1992). However, for extended defects, such as dislocations and interfaces, such calculations are only feasible when the number of atoms included into the calculation is well below one hundred. Hence, only very special cases can be treated in this framework and, indeed, the bulk of the dislocation and interfacial... [Pg.356]

If we except the Density Functional Theory and Coupled Clusters treatments (see, for example, reference [1] and references therein), the Configuration Interaction (Cl) and the Many-Body-Perturbation-Theory (MBPT) [2] approaches are the most widely-used methods to deal with the correlation problem in computational chemistry. The MBPT approach based on an HF-SCF (Hartree-Fock Self-Consistent Field) single reference taking RHF (Restricted Hartree-Fock) [3] or UHF (Unrestricted Hartree-Fock ) orbitals [4-6] has been particularly developed, at various order of perturbation n, leading to the widespread MPw or UMPw treatments when a Moller-Plesset (MP) partition of the electronic Hamiltonian is considered [7]. The implementation of such methods in various codes and the large distribution of some of them as black boxes make the MPn theories a common way for the non-specialist to tentatively include, with more or less relevancy, correlation effects in the calculations. [Pg.39]

Loffreda D, Simon D, Sautet P. 1999. Dependence of stretching frequency on surface coverage and adsorbate-adsorbate interactions A density-functional theory approach of CO on Pd (111). Surf Sci 425 68-80. [Pg.126]

Conventional bulk measurements of adsorption are performed by determining the amount of gas adsorbed at equilibrium as a function of pressure, at a constant temperature [23-25], These bulk adsorption isotherms are commonly analyzed using a kinetic theory for multilayer adsorption developed in 1938 by Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (the BET Theory) [23]. BET adsorption isotherms are a common material science technique for surface area analysis of porous solids, and also permit calculation of adsorption energy and fractional surface coverage. While more advanced analysis methods, such as Density Functional Theory, have been developed in recent years, BET remains a mainstay of material science, and is the recommended method for the experimental measurement of pore surface area. This is largely due to the clear physical meaning of its principal assumptions, and its ability to handle the primary effects of adsorbate-adsorbate and adsorbate-substrate interactions. [Pg.305]

Since the Fock operator is a effective one-electron operator, equation (1-29) describes a system of N electrons which do not interact among themselves but experience an effective potential VHF. In other words, the Slater determinant is the exact wave function of N noninteracting particles moving in the field of the effective potential VHF.5 It will not take long before we will meet again the idea of non-interacting systems in the discussion of the Kohn-Sham approach to density functional theory. [Pg.30]

Let us introduce another early example by Slater, 1951, where the electron density is exploited as the central quantity. This approach was originally constructed not with density functional theory in mind, but as an approximation to the non-local and complicated exchange contribution of the Hartree-Fock scheme. We have seen in the previous chapter that the exchange contribution stemming from the antisymmetry of the wave function can be expressed as the interaction between the charge density of spin o and the Fermi hole of the same spin... [Pg.48]

This, at first glance innocuous-looking functional FHK[p] is the holy grail of density functional theory. If it were known exactly we would have solved the Schrodinger equation, not approximately, but exactly. And, since it is a universal functional completely independent of the system at hand, it applies equally well to the hydrogen atom as to gigantic molecules such as, say, DNA FHK[p] contains the functional for the kinetic energy T[p] and that for the electron-electron interaction, Eee[p], The explicit form of both these functionals lies unfortunately completely in the dark. However, from the latter we can extract at least the classical Coulomb part J[p], since that is already well known (recall Section 2.3),... [Pg.52]

Encl[p] is the non-classical contribution to the electron-electron interaction containing all the effects of self-interaction correction, exchange and Coulomb correlation described previously. It will come as no surprise that finding explicit expressions for the yet unknown functionals, i. e. T[p] and Encl[p], represents the major challenge in density functional theory and a large fraction of this book will be devoted to that problem. [Pg.52]

Of course, all this is not new but only a recapitulation of results from Chapter 1. The important connection to density functional theory is that we now go on to exploit the above kinetic energy expression, which is valid for non-interacting fermions, in order to compute the major fraction of the kinetic energy of our interacting system at hand. [Pg.59]

Are there any remedies in sight within approximate Kohn-Sham density functional theory to get correct energies connected with physically reasonable densities, i. e., without having to use wrong, that is symmetry broken, densities In many cases the answer is indeed yes. But before we consider the answer further, we should point out that the question only needs to be asked in the context of the approximate functionals for degenerate states and related problems outlined above, an exact density functional in principle also exists. The real-life solution is to employ the non-interacting ensemble-Vs representable densities p intro-... [Pg.74]


See other pages where Density functional theory interactions is mentioned: [Pg.638]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.389]    [Pg.631]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.757]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.82]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.431 , Pg.432 , Pg.433 ]




SEARCH



Density functional theory interaction prediction

Density functional theory intermolecular interactions, electron

Density functional theory protein-ligand interactions

Functional interactions

Interaction Theory

Interactive function

© 2024 chempedia.info