Crossbridges

Thomas, D., 1987. Spectroscopic probes of muscle crossbridge rotation. Annual Review of Physiology 49 691 — 709. 

The structure and arrangement of the actin and myosin filaments in muscle. During muscle contraction the cyclic interaction of myosin crossbridges with actin filaments draws the actin filaments across the myosin filaments. 

The crossbridge cycle in muscle. Myosin crossbridges interact cyclically with binding sites on actin filaments. Note that the energy release step—when ATP is broken down to ADP—recocks the crossbridge head. 

Amos, L.A. (1989). Brain dynein crossbridges microtubules into bundles. J. Cell Sci. 93, 19-28. Amos, L.A. (1995). The microtubule lattice— 20 years on. Trends Cell Biol. 5,48-51. 

Just as important as the maximum active force a muscle can exert at various lengths, is the rate at which the muscle shortens as a function of the force load, i.e., the force-velocity curve. Both the length-tension curve and the force-velocity curve vary according to the degree of activation of a muscle. The rate at which crossbridges cycle is an inverse function of the load force (Figure 4). 

The compliance in series with the active force. Force exerted by the activated elements must be transmitted or borne by whatever structural elements are in series with them. In skeletal muscle there is clearly a tendon in series but not so with smooth muscle. In smooth muscle, the total length of contractile apparatus is broken up into individual cells with intercalating extracellular connective structures. In addition, the portions of the crossbridges in series with the pulling site must also be stretched before force can rise to isometric levels. Taken together, the... 

It is implicit in the idea of a series elastic component that there should be a lag between the activation of the contractile apparatus and the rise of force measured between the ends of the muscle. The observed time lag is also commensurate with the idea that the series component is largely due to the crossbridges themselves. 

Tropomyosin is thought to lie in the groove formed between the associated actin strands. The sites at which the myosin crossbridges attach are affected by the relationship between tropomyosin and the actin strands. The role of tropomyosin in smooth muscle is completely undefined while in striated muscle it is clearly involved in the activation of contraction. The difference is made clear by the absence from smooth muscle of the protein, troponin, which in striated muscle provides the binding site for the triggering calcium. 

Organization into macromolecular structures. There are no apparent templates necessary for the assembly of muscle filaments. The association of the component proteins in vitro is spontaneous, stable, and relatively quick. Filaments will form in vitro from the myosins or actins from all three kinds of muscle. Yet in vitro smooth muscle myosin filaments are found to be stable only in solutions somewhat different from in vivo conditions. The organizing principles which govern the assembly of myosin filaments in smooth muscle are not well understood. It is clear, however, a filament is a sturdy structure and that individual myosin molecules go in and out of filaments whose structure remains in a functional steady-state. As described above, the crossbridges sticking out of one side of a smooth muscle myosin filament are all oriented and presumably all pull on the actin filament in one direction along the filament axis, while on the other side the crossbridges all point and pull in the opposite direction. The complement of minor proteins involved in the structure of the smooth muscle myosin filament is unknown, albeit not the same as that of skeletal muscle since C-protein and M-protein are absent. 

Although in in vivo circumstances an intracellular free calcium increase apparently acts as the primary modulator of contraction, it can be bypassed in highly permeabilized smooth muscle preparations where the active subunit of MLCK can be introduced to phosphorylate myosin and induce contraction. The MLCK catalyzed phosphorylation of serine-19 is seen as the necessary event in the activation of smooth muscle myosin to form crossbridges. Thus, the rising phase of force during an isometric smooth muscle contraction follows an increase in the degree of phosphorylation of myosin, and that in turn follows the transient rise of (a) cytosolic free Ca, (b) Ca-calmodulin complexes, and (c) the active form of MLCK. The regulation of the intracellular calcium is discussed below. The dynam-... 

Figure 6. A hypothetical scheme for the control of the number of active crossbridges in smooth muscle. Following the activation of a smooth muscle by an agonist, the concentrations of intermediates along the main route begins to build up transiently. This is shown by the thickened arrows. Also, cAMP is generated which is universally an inhibitor in smooth muscle. Cyclic AMP in turn combines with protein kinase A, which accounts for most of its action. The downstream mechanisms, however, are not well worked out and at least three possibilities are likely in different circumstances. First, protein kinase A is known to catalyze the phosphorylation of MLCK, once phosphorylated MLCK has a relatively lower affinity for Ca-calmodulin so that for a given concentration of Ca-calmodulin, the activation downstream is reduced. The law of mass action predicts that this inhibition should be reversed at high calcium concentrations. Other cAMP inhibitory mechanisms for which there is evidence include interference with the SR Ca storage system, and activation of a MLC phosphatase.

For the purpose of discussion, crossbridge regulation can be split into three overlapping sets of reactions (a) the Ca-calmodulin cascade (MLCK activation), (b) the phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle (the Four State Model), and (c) actin-myosin cycle (chemomechanical transduction). 

For these reasons the Cooperative Hypothesis seems to be a plausible alternative to the Latch Bridge Hypothesis. Given that computer calculations of the behavior of various hypothetical schemes are now possible, an independent, noninvasive measure of distribution of myosin among the states would be of great use for further understanding of crossbridge kinetics. 

Once the intracellular Ca " concentration begins to rise, calmodulin-calcium binding also rises and MLCK, which is dependent on calmodulin activation, rises in turn. The next step in this cascade is the phosphorylation of myosin. Finally, the phosphorylation of myosin results in the activation of the crossbridges and the accompanying transduction of ATP energy into mechanical work. Despite its differences in regulation, smooth muscle behaves mechanically much like other muscles. 

---