Cost-benefit analysis stages

At each stage of the interaction between an individual plant species and an individual insect herbivore species, there are opportunities for the plant to gain fitness by influencing the behaviour of the insect as well as directly reducing insect fimess by attacking the basic physiology of the insect. But before considering this further, one has to address the concept of cost-benefit analysis. 

The methodology developed to integrate the consideration of these issues into a consistent measure of project worth is a nested cost-benefit analysis. Figure 1 illustrates the four stages of the methodology. 

The common elements of cost-benefit analysis are applicable to all areas. There are four main stages identification, classification, quantification, and presentation. Each of these stages presents its unique problems to the analyst, especially since the work of various participants and disciplines in a project must be combined. ( ) In the health, safety and environmental area, quantification of health and human welfare benefits has proved to be an especially controversial topic.( ) Nevertheless, it is worthwhile to consider the application of cost-benefit analysis to regulation in that area in order to improve the quality of regulatory decisions, and to introduce discipline and rigor in the making of those decisions. 

Every stage in the search for a new drug is subject to Cost—Benefit Analysis (Cavalla, 1981). Every unnecessary test or delay adds to the cost of the eventual treatment. Hence, as soon as a substance has shown it is both promising and harmless in two laboratory species, nothing short of its administration to Man can give useful new information. Many a seemingly specific and potentially useful substance, chosen on the basis of animal trials, has had to be rejected in the clinic for such reasons as too brief an action, not absorbed from the gut, or serious side-effects not shown earlier. (Parenthetically, the member of a series of new compounds that turned out best in Man has not always been the member that excelled in laboratory experiments.)... 

Solution At a preliminary stage of design, the question is whether a process as described is feasible or not, that is, whether it conforms with the restrictions imposed by physical principles, in this case, the first and second law. If physical principles are violated, the process is clearly impossible. If it does not violate any principles, other considerations, such as a cost-benefit analysis, will have to be taken into account before a final decision is made. Our job is to determine whether the process is thermodynamically feasible or not. To make such determination, a detailed design is not necessaiy, as long as the broad features of the process are specified. In this case we know the effect on the system (initial and final state of steam), the amount of work that is exchanged, and the temperature of the surroundings that will supply heat, if necessaiy. 

The success of a Road Safety Audit can be measured not only by cost-benefit analysis but also by the proportion of problems and recommendations that are accepted by a client. Road Safety Audit recommendations should be relative to the problem and the stage of the design to ensure that a high percentage of comments are not rejected. 

Stage I Feasibihty Study - Cost Benefit analysis of three proposed... 

The cost-benefit analysis is not only critical during the project initiation stage but should also continue during the construction and operational stages using input relevant for each of these stages. 

A wide range of sustainability-assessment methods have been developed in recent years. Some well-known and commonly used tools for sustainability assessment are Criteria and Indicators (C I), Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA), Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), and Cost—Benefit Analysis (CB A) (Buytaert et al., 2011). This section focuses on LCA, aiming to present its basic stages. 

Automatization of all stages of the analytical process is a trend that can be discerned in the development of modern analytical methods for chemical manufacture, to various extents depending on reliability and cost-benefit considerations. Among the elements of reliability one counts conformity of the accuracy and precision of the method to the specifications of the manufacturing process, stability of the analytical system and closeness to real-time analysis. The latter is a requirement for feedback into automatic process-control systems. Since the investment in equipment for automatic online analysis may be high, this is frequently replaced by monitoring a property that is easy and inexpensive to measure and correlating that property with the analyte of interest. Such compromise is usually accompanied by a collection of samples that are sent to the analytical laboratory for determination, possibly at a lower cost. 

By introducing new instrumentation and by developing new measuring and analysis protocols, there are real possibilities that many forms of disease could be screened for or detected in their earliest, and hence most treatable, stages. This would result in considerable benefits for society and have a direct impact on the quality of life. Breath analysis also has the potential of offering significant cost and operational benefits to healthcare providers and improved care for patients. Patients will also benefit from swifter, more accurate and less intimidating procedures. 

---